Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 25, 2019
Accepted
June 25, 2019
Published
June 25, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 222 Download : 213

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is aimed at finding the most dominant move, step and the most common pattern of rhetorical style in Research Article Introduction in Law Studies Written By International Authors. The documentation technique  and checklist were  used  in this research. Fifteen English RA introductions by International authors were analyzed by using disourse analysis technique, using quantitative as well as qualitative method and following Swales’s CARS Model (1990). The results show that the authors dominantly use Move 1 (Establishing a territory) and Step 2 of Move 1 (Making Topic Generalisation). The fifteen articles mostly have the same model in leading to understanding to the article introduction. In addition, International authors of English RAs in Law Study prefer describing the phenomena and found the problem based on it to describing the previous research. The most common pattern is Complete Pattern. The articles which belong to Complete Pattern have three moves. While the one which has two moves belong to Semi complete and the one which has one move only belong to incomplete pattern. In conclusion, the articles in the three journals are categorized into appropriate articles in term of discourse structure.

Keywords

Undergraduate theses introduction metadiscourse markers Indonesian authors English students

Article Details

License
Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Afrizon, E., Arsyad, S., & ., Z. (2019). A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RHETORICAL STYLE IN RESEARCH ARTICLE INTRODUCTION IN LAW STUDIES WRITTEN BY INTERNATIONAL AUTHORS. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 2(4), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.2.4.84-102
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aprianti, D. (2017). The Citation Style In English Research Article Introductions Written By Indonesian Authors In Hard Sciences. Universitas Bengkulu.
  2. Arsyad, S. (2013). A Genre-Based Analysis On The Introductions Of Research Articles Written By Indonesian Academics. Universitas Bengkulu.
  4. Arsyad, S. (2013). A genre-based analysis of Indonesian research articles in the social sciences and humanities written by Indonesian speakers. Bengkulu University
  5. Arsyad, S. (2013). A Genre-Based Analysis on Discussion Section of Research Articles in Indonesian Written by Indonesian Speakers. Bengkulu University.
  6. Bisri, S. 14 Februari 2016). Apa yang harus ditulis dalam sebuah latar belakang masalah. (https://www.kompasiana.com/ww w.sugiantibisri.blogsot.com/apa- yang harus-ditulis-dalam-sebuah- latar-belakang masalah_56bfacc4ad7e610d0e4460
  7. (diakses pada 15 Januari 2018)
  8. Briones, RRY. (2012). Move Analysis of Philosophy Research Article Introductions Published in the University of Santo Tomas. University of Santo Tomas.
  9. Chahal, Dana. (2014). Research Article Introductions In Cultural Studies: A Genre Analysis Exploration Of Rhetorical Structure. Victoria University, Australia.
  10. Ishara, ER. (2016). Rethorical Structure Each Speaker Text in Grand Final WUDC 2009. Universitas Bengkulu. (Unpublished Thesis)
  11. Kamaruddin, dkk (2013). Rhetorical Structure in Academic Research Writing by Non-Native Writers. Universiti Malaysia Perlis.
  12. Miller, T. (1993). The discourse structure of research article introductions: Re- visited with evidence from Arabic.
  13. Muangsamai, P. 06 Maret 2018. Analysis of Moves, rhetorical patterns and linguistics features in new scientist articles. Kasetsart University, Thailand.
  15. Muhtadin, M., & Noermanzah, N. (2018). Rhetorical Structure and Linguistic Features in Introduction Parts of Research In Indonesian Legal Science Journal. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 11(2), 205. doi:10.24036/ld.v11i2.8373
  16. Penington, K. (2005). The Introduction Section. Helsinki University of Technology. (http://www.cs.tut.fi/kurssit/SGN16
  17. /academic_writing/cars_model_
  18. handout.pdf ) (diakses pada 13
  19. Januari 2018)
  20. Rahman, dkk. (2017). Rhetorical Structure of Introduction in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. National University of Malaysia.
  21. Reihan, A. 06 Februari 2015. Teori Retorika. (https://www.kompasiana.com/alanr eihan/teoriretorika_54f9014fa33311 a13d8b491a) (diakses pada 22
  22. Januari 2018)
  23. Rusdiansyah. 03 Desember 2016.Kajian Budaya Indonesia Pemahaman Retorika. (https://kajianbudayablog.wordpress
  24. .com/2016/12/03/pemahaman-
  25. retorika/) (diakses pada 20 Januari
  27. Shim, E. (2015). Introductions in Research Papers:Genre Analysis of Academic Writing. Sangji University.
  28. Suryani, dkk. (4 November 2013).
  29. Rhetorical Structures in Academic Research Writing by Non- Native Writers. Universiti Malaysia Perlis
  30. & Universiti Utara Malaysia,
  31. Malaysia.
  32. Zaiontz, C. (2013). Real Statistik Using Excel Cohen’s Kappa. http://www.real- statistics.com/reliability/cohens- kappa/ (diakses pada 12 Februari