Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 21, 2020
Published
August 30, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 338 Download : 203

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the questions on the middle School Mathematics/MTs class VII Semester I Curriculum 2013 revision 2017 which is reviewed from the aspect of cognitive level accord to Bloom taxonomy revision. This type of research is descriptive research. The Instrument used in this research is a cognitive-level classification sheet of exercises. The data source in this research is the mathematics textbook of Class VII curriculum 2013 revised 2017 compiled by Abdur Rahman As'ari, et al. Curriculum and Conversation Center, Balitbang, Kemendikbud. The results of this research show that based on the cognitive level of the Bloom taxonomy is derived that there are only three categories of cognitive levels on the association's material train question namely remember, understanding, applying. The percentage of cognitive-level categories on the practice of the set material is C1 (remember) 1,25%, C2 (understanding) 41,25%, C3 (applying) 57,5%, C4 (analyze) 0%, C5 (evaluate) 0%, C6 (create) 0%.
Keywords: Analysis of Question, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cognitive Level

Article Details

License

An author who publishes in the Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the Journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Hasil gambar untuk gambar cc by sa

Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sari, S. I., Yensy B, N. A., & Siagian, T. A. (2021). ANALISIS SOAL MATERI HIMPUNAN BUKU MATEMATIKA SMP/MTs KELAS VII KURIKULUM 2013 BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI BLOOM. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 5(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.5.2.233-243
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assissing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
  2. Arikunto. 2009. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  3. Ilmi Khanifatul (2018). Level Kognitif Soal Materi Aljabar Pada Buku Pelajaran Matematika SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Skripsi. UIN Sunan Ampel.
  4. Hasan, M, I. 2003. Pokok-Pokok Materi Statistik 2. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  5. Http://bppsdmk.kemkes.go.id/pusdiksdmk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/00-KataKerja-Operasional-Kko-Edisi-Revisi-Teori Bloom.PDF
  6. Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
  7. Kemendikbud. (2014). Permendikbud Nomor 58 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) / Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs). Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
  8. Kemendikbud. (2017). Matematika Kelas 7 Semester 1. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
  9. Kemendikbud. 2018. Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
  10. Komara, Endang (2014). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Interaktif. Bandung : PT Refika Aditama.
  11. Kuswana, S.W. (2012). Taksonomi Kognitif (Pengembangan Ragam Berfikir). Bandung:PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  12. Sari, S. A., Yensy, N. A., dan Agustinsa, R. 2019. Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Yang Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Berbasis Kontekstual Dengan Pembelajaran Ekspositori di SMP Negeri 6 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 3 (1), 67.
  13. Setiawati, N., Rusdi., dan Yensy, N. A. 2017. Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing Tipe Pre Solution Dengan Pembelajaran Konvensional Ditinjau Dari Hasil Belajar Matematika Siwa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS),4 (1), 176.
  14. Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  15. Sugiyono. (2012). Statistik Nonparametris untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  16. Triutami, I., Yensy, N. A., dan Siagian, T. A. 2020. Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP antara Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 4 (1), 53.