Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 23, 2022
Published
August 14, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 136 Download : 149

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kognitif soal uji kompetensi pada materi bilangan berdasarkan teori Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan menggunakan instrumen penelitian berupa lembar klasifikasi soal. Hasil penelitian diperoleh enam tingkat kognitif soal dengan persentase C1-Mengingat 0% (tidak ada sama sekali), C2-Memahami sebesar 6,90% (2 butir soal), C3-Mengaplikasikan sebesar 68,96% (20 butir soal), C4-Menganalisis sebesar 20,69% (6 butir soal), C5-Mengevaluasi sebesar 3,45% (1 butir soal), dan C6-Mencipta 0% (tidak ada sama sekali). Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa persentase tingkat kognitif mengaplikasikan (C3) lebih besar dari tingkat kognitif lainnya, sehingga soal uji kompetensi materi bilangan pada buku Matematika kelas VII kurikulum 2013 edisi revisi 2017 Kemendikbud cenderung melatih kemampuan peserta didik dalam menerapkan hasil belajar.

 

Kata kunci : Kurikulum 2013, Taksonomi Bloom, Tingkat Kognitif

ABSTRACT

This research aimed to determine the cognitive level of competency test questions on number topic based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy theory. This research was descriptive research with using research instruments in the form of question classification sheets. The results of this research obtained six cognitive levels of question with the percentage C1-Remembering 0% (none at all), C2-Understanding 6,90% (2 items), C3-Applying 68,96% (20 items), C4-Analyzing 20,69% (6 items), C5-Evaluating 3,45% (1 items), and C6-Creating 0% (none at all).This showed that the percentage of the applying cognitive level was greater than other cognitive levels, so that the number topic competency test question in the Mathematics Book Class VII Curriculum 2013 revised edition 2017 Kemendikbud tend to trained students’ abilities in applying learning outcomes.

 

Keywords : 2013 Curriculum, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cognitive Level

Article Details

License

An author who publishes in the Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the Journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Hasil gambar untuk gambar cc by sa

Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Winarni, N. R., Yensy B, N. A., Agustinsa, R., & Siagian, T. A. (2022). ANALISIS UJI KOMPETENSI MATERI BILANGAN PADA BUKU KURIKULUM 2013 TERBITAN KEMENDIKBUD BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI BLOOM REVISI. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 6(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.6.2.212-225
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agustina, N. K. (2018). Analisis Soal dalam Buku Teks Matematika SMP Kelas VII Berdasarkan pada Taksonomi Bloom Revisi [Undergraduate, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya]. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/27435/
  2. Arli, M. H., Rusdi, R. R., & Yensy, N. A. (2021). Analisis Uji Kompetensi Materi Lingkaran pada Buku Kemendikbud Edisi Revisi 2017 Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 5(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.5.1.81-89
  3. Baharun, H. (2018). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktik. Pustaka Nurja.
  4. Darise, G. N. (2019a). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Revisi Sebagai Solusi Alternatif Pendidikan di Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra’, 13(2), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v13i2.967
  5. Darise, G. N. (2019b). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Revisi sebagai Solusi Alternatif Pendidikan di Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra’, 13(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v13i2.967
  6. Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta.
  7. Hamzah, H. M. A., & Muhlisrarini. (2016). Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Rajawali Pers.
  8. Ilmi, K. (2018). Level Kognitif Soal Materi Aljabar pada Buku Pelajaran Matematika SMP/ MTs Kelas VII [Undergraduate, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya]. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/24917/
  9. Nurhayati, R. (2014). Pengaruh Etika Profesi terhadap Pendeteksian Tindakan Korupsi: Studi pada Auditor Senior dan Junior Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Barat [Other, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. https://doi.org/10/S_PEA_1005888_Appendix.pdf
  10. Purwanto, N. (2010). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  11. Suherman, E., & Winataputra, U. S. (1992). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Matematika. Universitas Terbuka, Depdikbud.
  12. Sukardi. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
  13. Widodo, A. (2006). Taksonomi Bloom dan Pengembangan Butir So