Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was done to produce student worksheet (LKPD) based on inquiry on tangent line to a cirle for grade 8 that is effective. This research was a Research and Development by modifying 4-D thiagarajan method into 3 phases of it, which are define, design, and develop. The effectiveness of LKPD was done to 32 students of Class VIII A in SMP Negeri 11, Bengkulu city as an effective class and was observed by two observers. Instrument of this research was effective sheet consist of teacher activity observation sheet, sudent activity observation sheet and student’s response sheet. The result of this research showed that LKPD was in effective category based on : 1) teacher activity observation that consisted of 8 statements was in very good category with an average score 34,5;  2) student activity observation that consisted of 7 statements was in very good category with an average score 30,17;  3) student’s response that consist of 10 statements was in very good category with an average score 43,76; and 4) learning outcome of students based on score of LKPD and Final Test (THB) was in good category with classical mastery persentage up to 93,75%.

Keywords

Effectiveness Student Worksheet Guided Inquiry

Article Details

Author Biographies

Della Maulidiya, Prodi S1 Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Bengkulu

Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Bengkulu

Agus Susanta, Prodi S1 Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Bengkulu

Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Bengkulu
How to Cite
Sari, I. P., Maulidiya, D., & Susanta, A. (2021). EFEKTIFITAS LKPD BERBASIS INKUIRI TERBIMBING PADA MATERI GARIS SINGGUNG LINGKARAN KELAS VIII. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 5(3), 476–486. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.5.3.476-486

References

  1. Abdurrohim, Feronika, T., & Bahriah, E. S. 2016. Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, (Online), Vol. 2, No. 2, (http:// http://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/JPPI/article/view/895, diakses 4 Januari 2018).
  2. Abidin, Y. 2016. Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
  3. Hamdayana, J. 2016. Metodologi Pengajaran. jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  4. Hamzah, M. A., & Muhlisrarini. 2014. Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
  5. Hidayat, W., & Sumarmo, U. 2013. Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Berpikir Logis Matematik serta Kemandirian Belajar. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Delta-Pi, (Online), Vol.2,No.1,(ejournal.unkhair.ac.id/index.php/deltapi/article/download/94/59, diakses 16 Januari 2018).
  6. Kurinasih, I., & Sani, B .2014. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan. Surabaya:Kata Pena.
  7. Mulyasa.2006. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  8. Nurdin, S., & Adriantoni. 2016. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA.
  9. Pariska, I. S., Elniati, S., & Syafriandi. 2012. Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Matematika Berbasis Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, (Online), Vol. 1, No. 1, (http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/pmat/article/view/1167, diakses 8 Januari 2018).
  10. Prastowo, A. 2015. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.
  11. Trianto. 2011. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  12. Trianto. 2011. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.