Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 21, 2021
Accepted
December 21, 2021
Published
December 29, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 785 Download : 2430

Main Article Content

Abstract

This purpose of this study are to determine the implementation of the electronic performance system (e- performance) of the Bengkulu Provincial Government, and also to find out what are the supporting and hindering factors. This research was classified as a descriptive research that aims to describe the events in an objective way. The research instruments were questionnaires and conducting interviews with key informants. Furthermore, data from the e- performance application and data from other competent sources are also used. The results of the study reveals the facts that: (1) the implementation of the e-kinerja of the Bengkulu Provincial Government has not been in line with the objectives of e- kinerja itself and (2) the supporting factors for the implementation of e-kinerja include: socialization has been carried out on e-kinerja, there are the employees who already have the ability to develop applications, the Bengkulu Provincial government's e-kinerja has received a security certificate from the BSrE-BSSN; and the inhibiting factors are the lack of competent employees in the field of information technology, there is also, moreover, no specific regulation including Standard Operating Procedure on e-kinerja, there is no special implementation team and supervisor for the implementation. e-kinerja, and to add on, the evaluation of the implementation of e-kinerja has not been carried out regularly.

 

Keywords

implementation supporting and inhibiting factors e-performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Denti, E. D., Abdillah, W., & Santi, F. (2021). Analisis Implementasi Sistem Elektronik Kinerja (e-kinerja) Pemerintah Provinsi Bengkulu. The Manager Review, 3(2), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.33369/tmr.v3i2.19707
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Cooper, DL dan Emory W (1996). Metode Penelitian Survey. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia.
  2. Jakarta: Prenhallindo,
  3. Edward III, George C. (1980). ImplementingPublic Policy. Congresional: Quartely Press Ghozali, Imam. (2016). Structural equation modeling: metode alternatif dengan partial least square (pls). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  4. Gibson, J.L. (2011). Struktur Organisasi dan Manajemen. Jakarta: Erlangga
  5. Haedar, A. (2016). Implementasi kebijakan: apa, mengapa, bagaimana, Guru Besar Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Negeri Makassar. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1 (1), 1- 11.
  6. Hair, Jr., Joseph F., et. al. (2016). Multivariate data analysis. Fifth Edition. New Jersey:
  7. PrenticeHall, Inc.
  8. Hardani. (2020). Penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif, Yogyakarta: Pustaka
  9. Hasibuan, S.P.Malayu. (1996). Perilaku dalam organisasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Husein, Umar. (1999). Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Remadja Rosdakarya.
  10. Irmin, S. (2004). Sikap positif karyawan berprestasi: self improvement series. Jakarta : Setia Media
  11. Jones, C.O. (1996). Pengantar kebijakan publik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  12. Jarwati, Sri Hartono, Djumali. (2016). Analisis Penilaian Sistem E-Kinerja, Komunikasi Dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara Pada Badan Perencanaan Pengembangan Dan Penelitian Daerah Kota Surakarta. Naskah Publikasi Fakultas Ekonomi Program Studi Manajemen Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta.
  13. Kirkpatrick, Donald L. (2006). Improving Employee Performance. New York: Amacom. Mangkunegara, (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, (Cetakan Kesepuluh), Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  14. Meuter, K., Kerem, K., & D. Nilsson. (2000). Customer Acceptance Of E-Billing In Estonia, International Journal Of Bank Marketing, Vol. 23, No. 2, Hal. 200-216.
  15. Moeheriono. (2012). Indikator Kinerja Utama (Iku): Perencanaan, Aplikasi, Dan Pengembangan Bisnis Dan Publik. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  16. Mukti, D.R., Setyanti, S.W.LH., Dan Farida, Lilik., (2019). Penerapan Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Berbasis E-Kinerja Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Melalui Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Banyuwangi. E-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, VI (1), (175-180).
  17. Mulyadi, Dedi. (2018). Studi Kebijakan Publik Dan Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: Alfabetha. Nitisemito, Alex. S. (1996). Manajemen Organisasi Publik. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  18. Noe, C.W. (1994). Human Resources Management: Theory, Perception, And Practice. New York: Prentice Hall.
  19. Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. (2003). Pendidikan Dan Perilaku Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Nurhayati, Ema. (2020). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Penilaian E-Kinerja Dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Kecamatan Semarang Timur Melalui Motivasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2 (2), ( 79– 91).
  20. Panggabean. (2017). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perjanjian Kinerja, Pelaporan Kinerja dan Tata Cara Reviu Atas Laporan Kinerja, Nomor 53, (2014)
  21. Prabowo, R., (2005). Manajemen: Pengantar. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  22. Pratama, Dhany, Wahyu., Murwaningsih, Tri, Dan Subarno, Anton. (2020) Penerapan E- Kinerja Di Dinas Pedagangan Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Informasi Dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran. (4), (2), E-ISSN 2614-0349.
  23. Prawirosentono, S. (1999). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. Yogyakarta: BPFE
  24. Ripley, R.B &, Franklin, G. (1982). Policy Implementation Bereaucracy. Secend Edition.
  25. Chicago Illlinois-Amerika: The Dorsey Press.
  26. Robbins. P.S, (2002). Prinsip-Prinsip Perilaku Organisasi. (5th Ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga Rukmana, Indra., Rahmawati, Rita., Dan Salbiah, Euis., (2020). Efektivitas Penilaian Kinerja Berbasis E-Kinerja Di Pusat Pelatihan Manajemen Dan Kepemimpinan Pertanian. Jurnal GOVERNANSI, 6 (1),P-ISSN 2442-3971 E-ISSN 2549-7138
  27. Schuller. Randall. J., (1999). Linking Competitive Strategies With Human Resourses Practice. New York: Academy Of Management Executive.
  28. Sekaran, Uma. (2016). Pemodelan Persamaan Struktural Pendekatan Pls Dan Sem: Aplikasi Struktural Smart Pls Dan Amos 16.00. Malang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Brawijaya.
  29. -----------------. (2006). Research Methods For Business: Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  30. Setiawan, G. (2017). Implementasi Dalam Birokrasi Pembangunan. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka Siagian, S.P. (2006). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. (13th Ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Sinamo, J.H. (2002). Etos Kerja:21 Etos Kerja Profesional Di Era Digital Global.
  31. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  32. Suprihanto J., Dkk. (2003). Perilaku Organisasional. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN.
  33. Sutrisno. (2018). Peningkatkan Kinerja Melalui Sistem Manajemen Kinerja. Jurnal Swara Patra, (8), (1).
  34. Theedens, D. (1996). Buku Pedoman Permainan Sasando. Kupang: Pengharapan Karya Abadi
  35. Topchik, G.S (2000). Managing Workplace Negativity. United States: Amacom Undang-Undang Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN), Nomor 5, (2014)
  36. Wahyuni, Sisi. (2020). Pengaruh Penerapan E-Kinerja Dan Integritas Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. ESS (Journal Of Education On Social Science), (4), (2).
  37. Wibowo. (2016). Manajemen Kinerja. Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: PT.Rajagrafindo Persada. Wirawan. (2015). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia Teori Aplikasi Dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  38. Wu, S.I., Hung, J.M.. (2008). A Performance Evaluation Model Of CRM On Nonprofit Organizations. Total Quality Management And Business Excellence 19 (4), 321– 342
  39. Zikmund, William G., Et Al. (2010). Business Research Methods, (Eight Edition). South Western, USA: Cengage Learning