Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 17, 2017
Accepted
November 17, 2017
Published
August 8, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 695 Download : 1105

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this research is firstly to measure the company performance of Ground Coffee Sahabat viewed from the perspective of finance, customers, internal business processes, learning and growth. Second to recommend strategies that should be applied in the future. The method used is Balanced Scorecard (BSC), by measuring equally financially and non-financially, divided into four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business processes, learning and growth. The results showed that the company performance of Ground Coffee Sahabat based on financial perspective is good with the number of score 4, the perspective of the customer category good with the number of score 1, internal business process perspective in the category of good with a score of 5, and learning and growth perspective also in good category with score 1. Overall the performance of this company can be said good with the overall weighting value of 0.7 and is on the scale of business "good". In the future strategy recommendations, the company further improves financial performance in generating profits, increasing sales, providing better service to customers, expanding the marketing area, expanding the form of cooperation with suppliers, increasing production numbers, better able to retain employees, and improve employee productivity.

Keywords

Corporate Performance Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Strategy

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Aspriyati, W., Andani, A., & Sukiyono, K. (2017). PENGUKURAN KINERJA PERUSAHAAN KOPI BUBUK “SAHABAT” DI LUBUKLINGGAU: APLIKASI BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC). Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 16(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.16.2.177-190
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aulia, D. dan Ikhwana, A. 2012. Perencanaan Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Kain Tenun Sutra dengan Pendekatan Metode Balanced Scorecard
  2. (Studi Kasus di Pabrik Tiga Putra). Jurnal Kalibrasi Sekolah Tinggi
  3. Teknologi Garut. 10 (1). ISSN : 2302-7320.
  4. Djumadi, A. 2008. Rancangan Balanced Scorecard Sebagai Instrumen Manajemen Strategi Dalam Pengembangan Kinerja PT Puspeta Agronusa. Skripsi, Program Sarjana Ekstensi Manajemen Agribisnis, Fakultas
  5. Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  6. Dunia, F. A dan Wasilah. 2009. Akuntansi Biaya. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
  7. Hanuma, S., dan Kiswara, E. 2011. Analisis Balanced Scorecard Sebagai Alat Pengukur Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Kasus pada PT Astra Honda
  8. Motor). http://eprints.undip.ac.id/26355/1/JURNAL.pdf. Diakses
  9. tanggal 13 Februari 2017.
  10. Irawan, M., Mustakim, Suhandini, Y. 2015. Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Teknik Industri,
  11. Universitas Panca Marga Probolinggo. 5(2). ISSN: 2088-4591.
  12. Kaplan, R., S. dan David P. Norton. 2000. Balanced Scorecard: Menerapkan Strategi Menjadi Aksi. Erlangga. Jakarta.
  13. Muslim, A., Musa Hubeis, dan M. Sailah, I. 2006. Evaluasi Kinerja Layanan Pengembangan Bisnis Bagi Usaha Kecil Menengah: Kasus BDS
  14. Garmen di Jakarta. Jurnal Industri Kecil Menengah (MPI). 1(1):62 – 76.
  15. Mustari, D. dan Primawati, A. 2014. Pemetaan Strategic Management
  16. dengan Balanced Scorecard Pada PT. A. Jurnal STMIK AMIKOM
  17. Yogyakarta.. ISSN: 2302-3805
  18. Pratiwi, I. Shinta, H. Riyasari, D. 2009. Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan
  19. Dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Simposium Nasional
  20. RAPI VIII 2009. ISSN:1412-9612.
  21. Pratiwi, R. P. 2009. Penerapan Smart System Sebagai Metode Pengukuran
  22. Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Pada UKM Hentoro Leather).
  23. Universitas Gunadarma.
  24. Ratnasari, A. dan Kirwani. 2013. Peranan Industri Kecil Menengah (IKM)
  25. Dalam Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Di Kabupaten Ponorogo.
  26. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
  27. Rompho, N. 2011. Why the Balanced Scorecard Fails in SMEs: A Case Study. International Journal of Business and Management. 6 (11): 39 – 46.
  28. Timur, A. P., Santoso, I., dan Effendi, M. 2014. Penilaian Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Menggunakan Balanced Scorecard (Studi Kasus pada Score Cafe, Malang). Jurusan Teknologi Industri Pertanian, Fakultas
  29. Teknologi Pertanian, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>