Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 17, 2024
Accepted
October 16, 2024
Published
November 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 130 Download : 93

Main Article Content

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate diet consiting of grass and tofu dregs supplemented soybean hulls on its digestibilities and milk production of Anglo Nubian does. Three heads of Anglo Nubian does, aging 17-18 month old, first parity, early lactation used as experimental animals. Latin square design was applied on this experiment with 3 treatments and 3 periods. The treatments were P0 ( 5 kg grass+ 6 kg tofu dregs+ 20 g mineral diluted on 20 g rice bran) as a control, P1 (P0+ 300 g wet soybean hulls), and P2 (P0 + 600 g wet soybean hulls). Data collected were analysed of variance, continued by least signifcant difference test. Variables measured were nutrition contens of feeds, feeds consumption:  either grass, concentrates, or total consumption. The variables observed were the nutritional content of feed ingredients, nutrient consumption from forage and concentrates (tofu dregs and soybean hulls), and total nutrient consumption, as well as feed digestibility, and daily milk production. The experimental results showed that the average nutritional consumption of forage feed was not significantly different (P>0.05), the average nutritional consumption of concentrate feed was significantly different (P<0.05), increased by adding soybean hulls, but the total nutritional consumption of feed did not different (P>0.05). The average digestibility of feed nutrients was not significantly different (P>0.05), however the digestibility of crude fiber and nitrogen free extracts showed a decrease (P<0.05) with the addition of soybean hulls to the diet. The average daily milk production, P0 was 1699.29 ml/h/d, not significantly different (P>0.05) from P1, which was 1764.76 ml/h/d, but P2 milk production which was 1853.33 ml/h/d was significantly higher (P< 0.01) than P0 and P1. This research can be concluded that the addition of 600 g of wet soybean hulls to the diets on early lactation Anglo Nubian does may increase the average daily milk production

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Tris Akbarillah, Hidayat Hidayat, L. Pratiwi, D. Purnamasari, E. Y. Utama, S. Nurzaman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Buletin Peternakan Tropis (Bulletin of Animal Tropical Science). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

References

  1. Amien, I., M. Nasich, dan Marjuki. 2012. Pertambahan bobot badan dan konversi pakan sapi Limousin Cross dengan pakan tambahan probiotik. Jurnal Ilmu dan Industri Peternakan, 4 (1): 3–7.
  2. AOAC. 2005. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International (18th ed.). AOAC, Maryland.
  3. Auza, F.A., R. Badaruddin, dan R. Aka. 2017. Peningkatan nilai nutrisi kulit ari kedelai yang difermentasi dengan teknologi Efective Microorganisme (EM4) dan waktu inkubasi yang berbeda. Jurnal Scientific Pinisi, 3 (2): 128-134
  4. Dwiyana, T., T. Akbarillah, dan H. Hidayat. 2021. Pengaruh penggunaan ampas kelapa (Cocos nucifera L.) dalam konsentrat dengan level berbeda terhadap produksi susu kambing Nubian. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 16(1): 8–16. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.16.1.8-16.
  5. Ehrlenbruch, R., M. Eknaes, T. Pollen, I.L., and Andersen, K.E. BØe,. 2009. Water intake in dairy goats - the effect of different types of roughages. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 9(4): 400–403.https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2010.e76.
  6. Kartiko H., T. Akbarillah, dan H. Hidayat. 2018. Pengaruh penggunaan bungkil inti sawit sebagai pengganti ampas tahu dalam ransum terhadap produksi susu kambing nubian. Jurnal Sains Peternakan Indonesia, 13(3): 229-237.
  7. Laya, N.K., F. Ilham, dan S. Soeyono. 2018. Hubungan bobot badan dan produksi susu kambing Peranakan Etawa (PE). Jambura Jounal of Animal Science, 1(1):13-17.
  8. Lunesu, M. F., M. Decandia, G. Molle, A.S. Atzori, G.C. Bomboi, dan A. Cannas, 2021. Dietary starch concentration affects dairy sheep and goat performances differently during mid-lactation. Animals, 11(5): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051222
  9. Maisaroh, N. S. .2019. Pengaruh Penggunaan Kulit Ari Kedelai Dan Pollard Terhadap Produksi Susu Dan Retensi Nitrogen Pada Kambing Peranakan Ettawa (PE). Sarjana Thesis. htp://repository.ub.id/id/eprint/179593
  10. McDonald, P., R.A. Edwards, J.F.D. Greenhalgh, C.A. Morgan, L.A. Sinclair, R.G. Wilkinson. 2017. Animal Nutrition. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, UK.
  11. Moroz, M. T., and V.I. Samorukov, 2020. Optimization of feeding conditions for dairy goats in order to increase their productivity. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 613(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/613/1/012085
  12. National Research Council [NRC]. 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminant: Sheep, Goats, Cervids and New World Camelids. 7th Ed. National Academic Press: Washington DC (US).
  13. Nugroho.A.T.K., P. Surjowardojo, dan M.N. Ihsan. 2010. Penampilan produksi sapi perah Friesian holstein (FH) pada berbagai paritas dan bulan laktasi di ketinggian tempat yang berbeda. JIIIPB., 20(1): 55-64.
  14. Pasaribu, A., Firmansyah., dan N. Idris. 2015. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Susu Sapi Perah Di Kabupaten Karo Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 18(1), 28–35.
  15. Prihatminingsih, G. E., A. Purnomoadi, dan D.W. Harjanti. 2015. Hubungan antara konsumsi protein dengan produksi, protein dan laktosa susu kambing Peranakan Ettawa. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 25(2): 20–27.
  16. Primiani,C.N., J. Widianto, W. Rahmawati, dan G. Chandrakirana. 2018. Profil isoflavon sebagai fitoestrogen pada berbagai leguminoceae lokal. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 15(1):704-708.
  17. Qisthon, A., dan Y. Widodo. 2015. Pengaruh peningkatan rasio konsentrat dalam ransum kambing Peranakan Ettawa di lingkungan panas alami terhadap konsumsi ransum respon fisiologis dan pertumbuhan. Zootek, 35(2): 351-360.
  18. Rahman, M. T., Hermawan, dan D. S. Tasripin. 2015. Evaluasi performa produksi susu sapi perah FriesHolland (FH) keturunan sapi impor. Students e-Journal. 4(3): 1-8.
  19. Rohmawati, D , I. H. Djunaidi, dan E. Widodo, 2015. Nilai nutrisi tepung kulit ari kedelai dengan level inokulum ragi dan waktu inkubasi yang berbeda. J. Ternak Tropika., 16(1): 30-33.
  20. Rostini, T., dan I. Zakir. 2017. Performans produksi, jumlah nematoda usus, dan profil metabolik darah kambing yang diberi pakan hijauan rawa Kalimantan. Jurnal Veteriner 18(3):469-477. https://doi.org/10.19087/jveteriner.18.3.469.
  21. Sarangi, S. 2018. Adaptability of goats to heat stress: A review. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 7(4): 1114–1126.
  22. Stemmer A., M. Siegmund-Schultze, C. Gall, dan A. Zarate. 2009. Development and worldwide distribution of the Anglo Nubian goat. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 11: 185.
  23. Sutedjo, H. 2016. Dampak fisiologis dari cekaman panas pada ternak. Jurnal Nukleus Peternakan. 3(1): 93-105.
  24. Tabares, F. P., J.V.B.. Jaramillo, Z. T, dan Ruiz-Cortez. 2014. Pharmacological Overview of Galactogogues. Veterinary Medicine International, 2014(10):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/602894.
  25. Wibowo, P.A., T.Y. Astuti, dan P. Soediarto. 2013. Kajian total solid (TS) dan solid non fat (SNF) susu kambing Peranakan Ettawa (PE). J. Ilmiah Peternakan, 1(1): 214-221.