Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 15, 2024
Accepted
November 3, 2024
Published
November 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 268 Download : 284

Main Article Content

Abstract

The article delves into the intricate relationship between food security and livestock sustainability in today's world. With the global population on the rise and evolving consumption patterns, the livestock sector is tasked with the dual challenge of meeting the growing demand for animal protein while minimizing environmental impacts. By conducting a thorough review of literature and analyzing recent case studies, this research investigates the crucial role of livestock farming in global food security and the sustainability hurdles it confronts. Key findings indicate that technological advancements like precision livestock farming, integrated food system approaches, and circular economy concepts hold promise as solutions to enhance production efficiency and decrease environmental impacts. Additionally, the article underscores the significance of effective policies, good governance, and shifts in consumer consumption patterns in propelling the transition towards more sustainable livestock systems. In conclusion, achieving a balance between food security and livestock sustainability necessitates a comprehensive approach that integrates technological innovation, appropriate policies, and collaborative efforts across sectors. This research offers valuable insights for policymakers, industry professionals, and researchers as they work towards establishing a sustainable, fair, and resilient food system in the modern era.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Arif Rahman Azis, Hamka, Woki Bilyaro, Muhammad Dani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Buletin Peternakan Tropis (Bulletin of Animal Tropical Science). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

References

  1. Adesogan, A. T., A. H. Havelaar, S. L. McKune, M. Eilittä, and G. E. Dahl. 2020. Animal source foods: Sustainability problem or malnutrition and sustainability solution? Perspective matters. Global Food Security 25: 100325.
  2. Andithama, N. 2014. Konflik Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Air di Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
  3. Bruce, M., C. Bellet, and J. Rushton. 2018. Successes and Problems with Measuring Water Consumption in Beef Systems. The Oxford Handbook of Food, Water and Society: 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190669799.013.49.
  4. Chapman, M., Satterfield, T., Wittman, H., & Chan, K. 2020. A payment by any other name: Is Costa Rica’s PES a payment for services or a support for stewards?. World Development 129: 104900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104900.
  5. Dakin, B., A. Ching, E. Teperman, C. Klebl, M. Moshel, and Bastian, B. 2021. Prescribing vegetarian or flexitarian diets leads to sustained reduction in meat intake. Appetite 164: 105285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105285.
  6. Devendra, C., and C. Chantalakhana. 2002. Animals, poor people and food insecurity: opportunities for improved livelihoods through efficient natural resource management. Outlook on Agriculture 31: 161 - 175. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000002101294010.
  7. Duncan, A., A. Ayantunde, M. Blummel, T. Amole, V. Padmakumar, and D. Moran. 2023. Applying circular economy principles to intensification of livestock production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Outlook on Agriculture 52: 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270231199116.
  8. Gibbs, J., and F. Cappuccio. 2022. Plant-Based Dietary Patterns for Human and Planetary Health. Nutrients 14: 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14081614.
  9. Godfray, H., P. Aveyard, T. Garnett, J. Hall, T. Key, J. Lorimer, R. Pierrehumbert, P. Scarborough, M. Springmann, and S. Jebb. 2018. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science 361: 243.
  10. Guyomard, H., Z. Bouamra‐Mechemache, V. Chatellier, L. Delaby, C. Détang-Dessendre, J. Peyraud, and V. Réquillart. 2021. Review: Why and how to regulate animal production and consumption: The Case of the European Union. Animal: an international journal of animal bioscience 15: 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100283.
  11. Huis, A., and L. Gasco. 2023. Insects as feed for livestock production. Science 379: 138-139.
  12. Kaur, R., L. Dhaliwal, and S. Dhindsa. 2019. Livestock contribution to climate change – a review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(9):1099-1107. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.127.
  13. Khade, S., R. Khillare, and M. Dastagiri. 2021. Global livestock development: Policies and vision. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 91(9): 770-779.
  14. Khurshid, N., S. Ajab, M. Tabash, and M. Bărbulescu. 2023. Asymmetries in climate change and livestock productivity: non-linear evidence from autoregressive distribution lag mode. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7: 1139631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1139631.
  15. Lakamp, A., D. Aherin, D. Spencer, R. Larson, R. Weaber, J. Bormann, and M. Rolf. 2021. 235 resource use for beef cattle in the north central great plains. Journal of Animal Science 99: 12.
  16. Leip, A., G. Billen, J. Garnier, B. Grizzetti, L. Lassaletta, S. Reis, D. Simpson, M. Sutton, W. Vries, F. Weiss, and H. Westhoek. 2015. Impacts of European livestock production: nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, water eutrophication and biodiversity. Environmental Research Letters 10: 115004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115004.
  17. Li, B., and B. Jiang. 2021. Responses of forest structure, functions, and biodiversity to livestock disturbances: A global meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology 27: 4745-4757. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15781.
  18. Mehrabi, Z., M. Gill, M. Wijk, M. Herrero, and N. Ramankutty. 2020. Livestock policy for sustainable development. Nature Food 1: 160-165.
  19. Mekonnen, Y., S. Namuduri, L. Burton, A. Sarwat, and S. Bhansali. 2020. Review—Machine learning techniques in wireless sensor network based precision agriculture. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 167: 037522. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0222003jes.
  20. Morgado, J., Lamonaca, E., Santeramo, F., Caroprese, M., Albenzio, M., & Ciliberti, M. 2023. Effects of management strategies on animal welfare and productivity under heat stress: A synthesis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1145610.
  21. Morrone, S., C. Dimauro, F. Gambella, and M. Cappai. 2022. Industry 4.0 and precision livestock farming (PLF): An up to date overview across animal productions. Sensors 22: 4319. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124319.
  22. Mountzouris, K. 2016. Bioactive feed additives as alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters : cases of probiotic and phytogenic applications in broilers : feed science. AFMA Matrix 25: 59-61.
  23. Mustikaningrum, D., K. Kristiawan, dan S. Suprayitno. 2021. Emisi gas rumah kaca sektor pertanian di Kabupaten Tuban: inventarisasi dan potensi aksi mitigasi. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan 9(2): 155-171.
  24. Nowacka, M., M. Trusinska, P. Chraniuk, F. Drudi, J. Lukasiewicz, N. Nguyen, A. Przybyszewska, K. Pobiega, S. Tappi, U. Tylewicz, K. Rybak, and A. Wiktor. 2023. Developments in plant proteins production for meat and fish analogues. Molecules 28: 2966.https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28072966.
  25. Parihar, S., K. Saini, G. Lakhani, A. Jain, B. Roy, S. Ghosh, and B. Aharwal. 2019. Livestock waste management: A review. Journal of entomology and zoology studies 7: 384-393.
  26. Place, S. 2023. 433 leveraging feed technologies to reduce methane emissions from livestock. Journal of Animal Science 101(3): 210-211.
  27. Riaz, M. 2022. Livestock integrated farming in rural area of pakistan. Advances in Biological Sciences Research 20:1-3.
  28. Sari, F. P., M. Munizu, M. Rusliyadi, I. Nuryanneti, dan L. Judijanto. 2024. Agribisnis: Strategi, Inovasi dan Keberlanjutan. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia, Yogyakarta.
  29. Smith, J., K. Sones, D. Grace, S. Macmillan, S. Tarawali, and M. Herrero, 2013. Beyond milk, meat, and eggs: Role of livestock in food and nutrition security. Animal Frontiers 3: 6-13.
  30. Su, Q., Yu, Y., Yang, L., Chen, B., Fu, T., Liu, W., Chen, G., & Lyu, W. 2023. Study on the variation in coastal groundwater levels under high-intensity brine extraction conditions. Sustainability 15(23): 16199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316199.
  31. Suwarti, S. A., M. Masyhuri, dan D. Djamhari. 2015. Pengaruh faktor sosial ekonomi rumah tangga terhadap konsumsi produk peternakan di Kecamatan Kasihan Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Agribisnis dan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian 1(1): 1-16.
  32. Symeonaki, E., K. Arvanitis, D. Piromalis, D. Tseles, and A. Balafoutis. 2022. Ontology-based IoT middleware approach for smart livestock farming toward agriculture 4.0: A case study for controlling thermal environment in a pig facility. Agronomy 12(3): 750.
  33. Tedeschi, L., and E. Mendes. 2023. 13 precision livestock farming tools for climate-smart feedyard operations. Journal of Animal Science 101(3): 326-327.
  34. Tullo, E., A. Finzi, and M. Guarino. 2019. Review: Environmental impact of livestock farming and precision livestock farming as a mitigation strategy. The Science of the total environment 650: 2751-2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.018.
  35. Wang, S., F. Ang, and A. Lansink. 2023. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions on Dutch dairy farms. An efficiency analysis incorporating the circularity principle. Agricultural Economics 54(6): 819-837. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12804.
  36. Yang, G., J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, X. Xu, H. Zhang, and Y. Xu. 2022. Research trends in crop–livestock systems: a bibliometric review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(14): 8563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148563