Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 27, 2022
Accepted
December 22, 2022
Published
December 27, 2022
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 105 Download : 124

Main Article Content

Abstract

Produktivitas lahan sawah beririgasi di Desa Sumber Agung, Bengkulu Utara masih rendah. Petani mempraktekkan budidaya padi secara konvensional dengan masukan pupuk dan pestisida kimia. Sekolah lapang pengelolaan hama terpadu (SLPHT) dilakukan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan tentang ekosistem tanaman dan produktivitas padi sawah, dan mengurangi penggunaan pestisida kimia. Kegiatan dilakukan pada demplot seluas +7.500 m2, untuk membandingkan sistem pengelolaan hama terpadu (PHT) dengan sistem konvensional. Petani peserta SLPHT dilatih melakukan pengamatan ekosistem tanaman setiap minggu selama satu musim tanam (11 kali pertemuan). Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pengetahuan petani tentang ekosistem padi dan pengelolaan tanaman sehat dan hama penyakit tanaman hampir dua kali lipat dengan skor nilai dari 42.72 menjadi 83.52. Aplikasi pestisida nabati dan agensia hayati dilakukan pada petak PHT sebanyak 3 kali,  sedangkan aplikasi pada petak konvensional sebanyak 8 kali dengan menggunakan pestisida kimia. Serangan dari hama burung pipit yang tidak bisa ditanggulangi menyebabkan produktivitas rendah. Hasil ubinan gabah kering panen (GKP) pada petak PHT adalah 2.3 + 0.36 kg (setara 2.172 ton per Ha) sedangkan pada petak konvensional 2.06 + 0.38 kg (setara 1.94 per Ha).

Keywords

Demplot Hama Penyakit Monitoring Ekosistem Padi Sawah Produktivitas

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Dwinardi Apriyanto, Tunjung Pamekas, Nadrawati Nadrawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Apriyanto, D., Pamekas, T., & Nadrawati. (2022). Sekolah Lapang Pengelolaan Hama Terpadu (SLPHT) di Desa Sumber Agung Bengkulu Utara. Dharma Raflesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pengembangan Dan Penerapan IPTEKS, 20(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.33369/dr.v20i2.21471
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. BPP (2021). Laporan Program Penyuluhan Desa.
  2. Bartlett, A. (2005). Farmer field schools to promote integrated pest management in Asia: the FAO experience, Workshop on Scaling Up Case Studies in Agriculture, IRRI.
  3. Barzman, M., Bàrberi, P., Birch, A. N. E., Boonekamp, P., Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S., Graf, B., Hommel, B., Jensen, J. E., Kiss, J., Kudsk, P., Lamichhane, J. R., Messéan, A., Moonen, A. C., Ratnadass, A., Ricci, P., Sarah, J. L., Sattin, M. (2015). Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35 (4), 1199–1215.
  4. Dhakal, A. & Poudel, S. (2020). Integrated pest management (IPM) and its application in rice – a review. Reviews In Food And Agriculture, 1(2), 39-43.
  5. Horgan, F. G. (2017). Integrated pest management for sustainable rice cultivation: a holistic approach, pp. 309–342. In: T. Sasaki (ed.), Achieving Sustainable Cultivation of Rice, vol. 2. Burleigh Dodds, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  6. Horgan, F. G. & Kudavidanage, E. P. (2020). Use and avoidance of pesticides as responses by farmers to change Impacts in rice ecosystems of Southern Sri Lanka. Environmental Management, 65, 787–803.
  7. John D. A. & Babu, G. R. (2021). Lesson from aftermath of green revolution on food system and health. Frontiers in sustainable food systems 5:1-6.
  8. Martono, E. (2009). Evolutionary revolution: implementing and disseminating IPM in Indonesia, pp. 359-381, In: R. Peshin, A.K. Dhawan (eds.). Integrated Pest Management: Dissemination and Impact. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2000. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8990-9-10
  9. McClelland, S. (2002). Indonesia’s integrated pest management in rice: successful integration of policy and education, environmental practice, 4 (4), 191-195.
  10. Siddiqui, A. A., Mirani, Z. A. and Bukhari, S. S. (2012). Impact of farmer field school training on farmers’ knowledge and skills regarding recommended agro-ecological sound IPM practices in selected districts of Sindh. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Sciences, 28, 186-198.
  11. Thorburn, C. (2015). The rise and demise of integrated pest management in rice in Indonesia. Insects, 6 (2), 381-408.
  12. van den Berga, H. , Ketelaarb, J. W., Dickea, M., & Fredrix, M. (2020). Is the farmer field school still relevant? Case studies from Malawi and Indonesia. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 92, (1), 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100329
  13. Waddington, H., Snilstveit, B., Hombrados, J., Vojtkova, M., Phillips, D., Davies, P., & Whit, H. (2014) Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. The Campbell Collaboration.
  14. Wijono, S. (2020). Building a new phase of IPM in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 468, IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1755-1315/468/1/011003
  15. Winarto, Y. T., Walker, S., Ariefiansyah, R., Lisan, I. H., Bestari, M. Y., & Audina, T. (2020). University’s inclusion in providing climate services to farmers: is it possible without agricultural agents and farmer facilitators?. pp 835–852, In: Leal Filho, W., Nagy, G., Borga, M., Chávez Muñoz, P., Magnuszewski, A. (eds.). Climate Change Management: Climate Change, Hazards and Adaptation Options. Springer, Cham., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37425-9_42