Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Kegiatan ini berjudul Pelatihan Penggunaan Aplikasi Padlet Untuk Penunjang Pembelajaran Interaktif dan Komunikatif Era Merdeka Belajar Pada Sekolah Penggerak SDN 149 Seluma. Tujuan pengabdian ini untuk untuk menambah pengetahuan dan keterampilan mengajar pada tenaga pengajar di Sekolah Penggerak SDN 149 Seluma tentang Peningkatan Kompetensi dan Literasi Teknologi dalam pembelajaran dengan Metode yang kami gunakan dalam kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini adalah metode pelatihan dengan cara ceramah dan tanya jawab serta mengadakan praktek langsung dilanjutkan simulasi bagi para peserta pelatihan. Kegiatan Pelatihan Penggunaan Ipteks berupa Aplikasi Padlet Untuk Untuk Penunjang Pembelajaran Interaktif dan Komunikatif Era Merdeka Belajar Pada Sekolah Penggerak yaitu SDN 149 Seluma. Peserta kegiatan ini adalah Tenaga Pendidik Pada Sekolah Penggerak yaitu SDN 149 Seluma berjumlah 14 orang. Dari pelaksanaan kegiatan tersebut diharapkan bisa menjawab permasalahan yang ada, dimana manfaat yang diharapkan setelah mengikuti pelatihan adalah; (1) Terampil menggunakan Aplikasi Padlet yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan proses belajar mengajar, (2) Meningkatkan pengetahuan guru mengenai pemanfaatan teknologi untuk menunjang pembelajaran yang interaktif dan komunikatif, (3) Meningkatkan kemampuan dan keterampilan guru dalam hal mempersiapkan perangkat pembelajaran yang inovatif, dan (4) Membantu guru untuk menghasilkan media pembelajaran yang berkualitas melalui Aplikasi Padlet.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2024 Bogy Restu Ilahi, Adif Jawadi Saputra, Andes Permadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
- Alsmadi, A. A. (2007). A comparative study of two standard-setting technique. Social Behavior and Personality, 38 (4), 479 – 486.
- Berk, R.A. (1986). A consumer’s guide to setting performance standards on criterion-referenced tests. Review of Educational Research, 56, (1), 137 – 172.
- Chesser, A. M. S., Laing, M. R., Miedzybrodzka, Z., Brittenden, J. (2004). Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment. Medical Education, 38, 825 – 1.
- Goodwin, L.D. (1996). Relation between abserved item difficulty levels and Angoff minimum passing levels for a group of borderline examniness. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 13-28.
- Herkusumo, Arniati Prasedyawati, (2011) . Standard Setting Ujian Nasional Dengan Menggunakan Metode Angoff danBookmark . Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan17(3), 269-282.
- Kane, M.T., & Wilson, J. (1984). Errors of measurement and standard setting in mastery testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. 8 9 (1), 107 – 115.
- Kane, M.T. (1994). Validating the performance standards associated with passing score. Review of Educational Reseach. 64 (3), 425 – 461.
- Karantonis, A,. & Sireci, S. G. (2006), The Bookmark standard-setting method: a literatur review, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Spring, 4 12
- Koffler, S. L. (1980). A Comparison of appoaches for setting proficiency standards, Journal of Education Measurement, 17 (3), 167-178.
- .Livingstone, S. A., & Zieky, M. J. (1982). Passing scores: a manual for setting occupational tests, Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
- Premastuti, N. B. (2010). Komparasi standard setting metoda group contrast dan Bookmark pada mata pelajaran Akuntansi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14 (2), 225 -245.
- Retnawati, H. (2008). Penentuan batas lulus (standard setting) ujian nasional mata pelajaran Matematika di DIY. Laporan Penelitian. UNY: PKPSP LP.
- Saunders, J.C., Ryan, J.P., & Huynh, H. (1980, March 5 – 9). A comparison of two ways of setting passing scores based on the nedelsky procedure. Publication Series in Mastery Testing. South Carolina: University of South Carolina College of Education Colombia. this Article is presented at the annual conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Norfolk, Virginia.
- Skaggs, G., Hein, S.F., & Awuor, R. (2007). Setting passing Scores on passage based test: a comparison of traditional and single-passage Bookmark method, Applied Measurement In Education. 20 (4), 405 – 426.
- Utomo dan Ruijter. ( 1990). Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Gramedia
- Wasidi. (2009). Tingkat kesulitan dan daya beda skor kontinyu. Serunai, 5(1), 269-273.
- Wasidi (2020). Tes dan Pengukuran Pendidikan. Jakarta : Halaman Moeka Publishing.
- Yin, P., & Sconing, J., (2008). Estimating standard errors of cut scores for item rating and mapmark procedure: a generalizability theory approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68 25 – 41.
References
Alsmadi, A. A. (2007). A comparative study of two standard-setting technique. Social Behavior and Personality, 38 (4), 479 – 486.
Berk, R.A. (1986). A consumer’s guide to setting performance standards on criterion-referenced tests. Review of Educational Research, 56, (1), 137 – 172.
Chesser, A. M. S., Laing, M. R., Miedzybrodzka, Z., Brittenden, J. (2004). Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment. Medical Education, 38, 825 – 1.
Goodwin, L.D. (1996). Relation between abserved item difficulty levels and Angoff minimum passing levels for a group of borderline examniness. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 13-28.
Herkusumo, Arniati Prasedyawati, (2011) . Standard Setting Ujian Nasional Dengan Menggunakan Metode Angoff danBookmark . Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan17(3), 269-282.
Kane, M.T., & Wilson, J. (1984). Errors of measurement and standard setting in mastery testing. Applied Psychological Measurement. 8 9 (1), 107 – 115.
Kane, M.T. (1994). Validating the performance standards associated with passing score. Review of Educational Reseach. 64 (3), 425 – 461.
Karantonis, A,. & Sireci, S. G. (2006), The Bookmark standard-setting method: a literatur review, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Spring, 4 12
Koffler, S. L. (1980). A Comparison of appoaches for setting proficiency standards, Journal of Education Measurement, 17 (3), 167-178.
.Livingstone, S. A., & Zieky, M. J. (1982). Passing scores: a manual for setting occupational tests, Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
Premastuti, N. B. (2010). Komparasi standard setting metoda group contrast dan Bookmark pada mata pelajaran Akuntansi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14 (2), 225 -245.
Retnawati, H. (2008). Penentuan batas lulus (standard setting) ujian nasional mata pelajaran Matematika di DIY. Laporan Penelitian. UNY: PKPSP LP.
Saunders, J.C., Ryan, J.P., & Huynh, H. (1980, March 5 – 9). A comparison of two ways of setting passing scores based on the nedelsky procedure. Publication Series in Mastery Testing. South Carolina: University of South Carolina College of Education Colombia. this Article is presented at the annual conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Norfolk, Virginia.
Skaggs, G., Hein, S.F., & Awuor, R. (2007). Setting passing Scores on passage based test: a comparison of traditional and single-passage Bookmark method, Applied Measurement In Education. 20 (4), 405 – 426.
Utomo dan Ruijter. ( 1990). Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Gramedia
Wasidi. (2009). Tingkat kesulitan dan daya beda skor kontinyu. Serunai, 5(1), 269-273.
Wasidi (2020). Tes dan Pengukuran Pendidikan. Jakarta : Halaman Moeka Publishing.
Yin, P., & Sconing, J., (2008). Estimating standard errors of cut scores for item rating and mapmark procedure: a generalizability theory approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68 25 – 41.