Main Article Content

Abstract





The main goal of this research is to determine "What cultural awareness is represented in the English textbooks Pathway to English Grade X General Programme?”, “What cultural awareness is represented in the English textbooks Pathway to English Grade X Elective Programme?”, and “What are the comparison between two English textbooks?”. Two English textbooks from the same author and publisher but used in different programmes for senior high school were chosen for this study, they are Pathway to English Grade X, General Programme; and Pathway to English Grade X, Elective Programme. This study is part of the qualitative approach to library research. To make it easier to understand, Percentage-based quantitative analysis is used. Researchers collect data from English textbooks in the context of textbook analysis to come clean about the way culture awareness contents are represented in two English textbooks. The findings show that all English textbooks presented cultural awareness content, and the cultural awareness contents in each English textbook used by Senior High School as EFL have covered four aspects of cultural content for Book I, and seven aspects of cultural content for Book II. Although not all aspects of the cultural category are covered in the English textbook, it is clear that the cultural content exceeds half of the total. The percentage of those is as follows: Book I have 72,80 per cent and Book II have 70 per cent. This suggests that the authors should use several different cultural awareness aspects in their English textbook as EFL.





Keywords

English Textbook , Cultural awareness , EFL of Senior High School

Article Details

How to Cite
Rismasari, & Arsyad, S. (2023). Comparison of Cultural Awareness in English Textbook for General and Elective Programs Used by EFL of Senior High School. Journal of English for Specific Purposes in Indonesia (JESPI), 2(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.33369/espindonesia.v1i2.25788

References

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Ahmadi, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2016). EFL teachers’ perceptions towards textbook evaluation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 260-267. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.06
  3. Byram, M., & Morgan, C. (1994) Teaching-and-Learning language and culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  4. Faris I. N. (2014). Cultural content analysis of an English textbook for Senior High School grade three in Cianjur, West Java. Journal of English and Education, 2(2), 14–25.
  5. Gholami, R., Noordin, N., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2017). A Thorough Scrutiny of ELT Textbook Evaluations: A Review Inquiry. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.3p.82
  6. Gunantar, D. (2017). Textbooks Analysis: Analyzing English as a foreign language (efl) textbooks from the perspective of Indonesian culture. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v11i2.9590
  7. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  8. Issa Kawar, T. (2012). Cross-cultural differences in management. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(6), 1–3.
  9. Khusniyah, N. L., & Khomsiyah, I. (2019). Culture and religion value in E-English textbook for junior high school: A content analysis. JURNAL SCHEMATA Pascasarjana UIN Mataram, 8(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.20414/schemata.v8i1.803
  10. Maulana, A. (2020). Cross culture understanding in EFL teaching: An analysis for Indonesia context. Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v6i2.3460
  11. McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT. Edition History: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  12. Al Harbi, A. A. M. (2017). Evaluation Study for Secondary Stage EFL Textbook: EFL Teachers’ Perspectives. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n3p26
  13. Nadhip, A. (2017). Representation of religious and moral values in the English textbook for Indonesian junior high school: A CDA investigation. Kodifikasia Jurnal Penelitian Islam, 11(1), 79–104.
  14. Nurul Ain Johar, & Azlina Abdul Aziz. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions on using the pulse 2 textbook. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous Studies, 2(1). www.jerisjournal.com
  15. Otlowski, M. (2003). Ethnic diversity and gender bias in EFL textbooks. The Asian EFL Journal, 18(1), 22– 27.
  16. Ratnasari, D. (2019). the Importance of cross-cultural understanding in foreign language teaching in the Asian context. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 46(2), 124– 131. https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v46i22018p124
  17. Riadini, U. S., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). The analysis of the culture-related contents in an Indonesian English textbook. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 285–295. https://ijeltal.org/index.php/ijeltal/article/view/711/pdf
  18. Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: University Press.
  19. Setiawan, A. (2019). Peran pendidikan dalam merubah karakter masyarakat dampak akulturasi budaya di
  20. Temajuk. Fenomena: Jurnal Penelitian, 11(1), 11–30., 10(1), 1–26.
  21. Sudarwati, Th. M & Grace, A. (2014). Pathway to English untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. General Program. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
  22. Sudarwati, Th. M & Grace, A. (2016). Pathway to English untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Elective Program. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
  23. Weri, F., Ratnawulan, & Gusnedi. (2019). Analysis of student textbook in the development of integrated natural science student book with the theme sense of sight and optical devices using the connected model for integrated 21st- century learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012113
  24. Yılmaz, M., Y., Yılmaz, U., Yilmaz, E. N. D. (2019). The relation between social learning and visual culture. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(4), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019450837