Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 31, 2022
Published
June 29, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 189 Download : 161

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract


Research conducted by researchers was related to Lexical Cohesion (repetition, synonym, superordinate, general word, and collocation). The purposes of this research were (1) to find out the comparison of lexical cohesion between BBC News and The Jakarta Post News; (2) to find out the type of lexical cohesion between BBC News and Jakarta Post; and (3) to find out the dominant use of lexical cohesion in BBC News and The Jakarta Post News. Descriptive qualitative was used in this study, while the source of the data was taken from news texts written by BBC News and The Jakarta Post News, totaling 20 news about the Qatar 2022 world cup football, consisting of 10 news texts from BBC News and 10 news texts from The Jakarta Post. To analyze the data, the researchers used the Halliday and Hassan’s theory. The results found that for Lexical Cohesion for BBC News, there were 214 repetitions, 0 synonyms, 0 superordinate, 2 general words, and 33 collocations. So, the total Lexical Cohesion is 249. While for The Jakarta Post News, it was found 429 repetitions, 9 synonyms, 0 superordinate, 20 general words, and 25 collocations. So, the total of lexical cohesions found is 483. From the comparison of the data above, The Jakarta Post News has more types of Lexical Cohesion namely 483, compared to BBC News which only found 249 types of Lexical Cohesion. The dominant type of Lexical Cohesion in this research is the type of repetition.

Keywords

Analysis, Comparative, Lexical Cohesion

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Agustian Agustian, Safnil Arsyad Syafnil Arsyad

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Agustian, A., & Arsyad, S. (2023). An Analysis of Comparative Lexical Cohesion Between BBC News and Jakarta Post News. Journal of English for Specific Purposes in Indonesia, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33369/espindonesia.v2i2.25853
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. References
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches ((fourth edition) ed.). Sage publication,Inc.
  3. Dastjerdi, S. (2011). Quality of Iranian EFL Learners’ Argumentative Essays: Cohesive devices in Focus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science.
  4. Dinda, D. N. (2020, November). Lexical Cohesion in Kid Talks: The Instagram Videos of Mila Stauffer. Lexical Cohesion in Kid Talks: The Instagram Videos of Mila Stauffer. https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/insaniyat/article/view/15081
  5. Fox, W., & Bayat, M. S. (2007). A Guide to Managing Research. Cape Town City. Juta Publications.
  6. Hakim, A. R. (2016). LEXICAL COHESION IN FICTION STORIES WITH REFERENCE TO THE FROG PRINCE AND THE BULLY. LEXICAL COHESION IN FICTION STORIES WITH REFERENCE TO THE FROG PRINCE AND THE BULLY. file:///C:/Users/WIN%2011/Downloads/17222-1-32567-1-10-20160103.pdf
  7. Halliday and Hassan. (1976). ). Cohesion in English. Harlow: Longman. Harlow: Longman.
  8. Hameed, H. T. (2008, Desember). Cohesion in Texts: A Discourse Analysis of a News Article in a Magazine. Cohesion in Texts: A Discourse Analysis of a News Article in a Magazine. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/2cb2c50eb7e95a87
  9. Hasia, J. M. (2019). LEXICAL COHESION IN BACKGROUND OF RESEARCH USED IN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS: A Case Study in Madako University. LEXICAL COHESION IN BACKGROUND OF RESEARCH USED IN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS: A Case Study in Madako University. https://www.academia.edu/41681994/LEXICAL_COHESION_IN_BACKGROUND_OF_RESEARCH_USED_IN_UNDERGRADUATE_THESIS_A_Case_Study_in_Madako_University
  10. Kumar,R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (3rd Ed. Pp-334. ed.). Sage Publications.
  11. Lehman, F & P, Jr. (2005). Research in Applied Linguistics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  12. Mason,J. (2002). Qualitative Researching (2nd Edition ed.). Sage Publications, London.
  13. Paltridge, B. (2000). ). Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Queensland. AEE Publishing.
  14. Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury. London: Bloomsbury.
  15. Rossman, G.B. and Rallis, S.F. (2012). Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research (3rd Edition ed.). Sage, Los Angeles.
  16. Sutton, J. and Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative Research: Data Collection, Analysis, and Management. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy.
  17. Toolan, M. C. (2006). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers (Cambridge Language Teaching Library). TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 579. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers (Cambridge Language Teaching Library). TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 579. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587181
  18. Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.