Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 6, 2020
Accepted
June 6, 2020
Published
June 6, 2020
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 51 Download : 154

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to reexamine the scale of service quality measurement that refers to multi-dimensional concepts. This type of research is quantitative descriptive research. This research is a quantitative research. Sampling in this study was carried out randomly by using probability sampling with a stratified random sampling technique in obtaining information from respondents. The number of samples used was 200 people in each department in the Economic and Business Faculty, University of Bengkulu. The results showed that service quality can be classified into 6 factors. These factors consist of Factor 1 which focuses on administrative services; Factor 2 which focuses on facilities and infrastructure; Factor 3 which focuses on the quality of teaching; Factor 4, which focuses on resource allocation; Factor 5, which focuses on the ease of borrowing space; and Factor 6 focuses on lecturer responsiveness to student complaints. The higher education institution and each unit under it are expected to pay attention to these factors in developing policies and programs.

 

Keyword:   Service Quality, HEdPerf (Higher Education Performance), HiEdQual (Higher Education Quality), Higher Education Institution.

Keywords

Service Quality HEdPerf (Higher Education Performance) HiEdQual (Higher Education Quality) Higher Education Institution.

Article Details

License

Please find the rights and licenses in Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen.

1. License

The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Managament Insight permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Managament Insight on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain the following rights:

Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

6. Termination

This agreement can be terminated by the author or Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen.

7. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen or its sublicensee.

8. Miscellaneous

Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Managament Insight or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Managament Insight may confirm the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.

How to Cite
Saputra, F. E. (2020). REKONSEPTUALISASI KONSTRUK KUALITAS LAYANAN SPESIFIK PADA KONTEKS PERGURUAN TINGGI. Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 15(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.33369/insight.15.1.49-64
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581.
  2. Ahmed, I., Nawaz, M. M., Usman, A., Shaukat, Z. M., Ahmad, N. dan Iqbal, H. 2010. “Impact of service quality on customer’s satisfaction: Empirical evidence from telecom sector of Pakistan”. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary research in Business, 1(12): 98-113
  3. Alridge S. dan Rowley J. 2001. “Conducting a withdrawal survey”. Quality in Higher Education, 7(1), 55-63.
  4. Annamdevula, S. dan Bellamkonda, R.S. 2016. “Effect of student perceived service quality on student satisfaction, loyalty, and motivation in Indian universities, 11 (2), 488-517.
  5. Brady, M. K., & Cronin, J., Jr. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 34–49.
  6. Bolton, R.N., Lemon, K.N. and Verhoef, P.C. (2004), “The theoretical underpinnings of customer asset management: a framework and propositions for future research”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 271-292.
  7. Chua, C. (2004). Perception of Quality in Higher Education, Australian Universities Quality Forum (AUQF) 7-9 July, Adelaide, Australia.
  8. Clewes, D. (2003). A Student-Centered Conceptual Model of Service Quality in. Higher Education. Journal of Quality in Higher Education, 9 (1): p.69-85.
  9. Cooper, D,r dan Schindler, P, S. 2003. “Business Research Method Eight Edition”. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  10. Cuthbert, P. (1996a). Managing Service Quality in HE: Is SERVQUAL the Answer? Part 1, Managing Service Quality, Vol.6 (2), 11-16.
  11. Cuthbert, P. (1996b). Managing Service Quality in HE: Is SERVQUAL the Answer? Part 2, Managing Service Quality, Vol.6 (3), 31-35.
  12. Deming, W. Edwards. 1982. Guide to Quality Control. Cambirdge: Massachussetts. Institute Of Technology.
  13. Dick A.S dan Basu K. 1994. “Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99-113.
  14. Dyson P. Farr A. dan Hollis N.S. 1996. “Understanding, Masuring, and Using Brand Equity”. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(6), 9-21.
  15. Grönroos, C. (1984), "A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 36-44.
  16. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 9-34.
  17. Juran, J.M. (1974) Juran's Quality Control Handbook. 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  18. Kotler, P. 2000. “Marketing Managemnet 10thedn”. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
  19. Lau M,M., Cheung R., Lam A,Y,C dan Chu Y,T. 2013. “Measuring Service Quality in the Banking Industry: A Hongkong Based Study”. Coutemporary Managemnet Research Vol. 9 No. 3. September 2013.
  20. Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods qualitative and quantitavie approach (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River Pearson.
  21. O’Neill, M.A. and Palmer, A. 2004. “Importance-performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 39-52.
  22. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V. A., dan Berry L. L. 1985. “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research”. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50.
  23. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V., dan Berry L. 1988. “SERVQUAL: a Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality”. Journal of Retailing, 6(1), 12-36.
  24. Parri, J. (2006), “Quality in higher education”, Vadyba/Management, Vol. 2 No. 11, pp. 107-111.
  25. Quinn, A., Lemay, G., Larsen, P. and Johnson, D.M. (2009), “Service quality in higher education”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 139-152
  26. Rahmatina Desi. 2010. “Prosedur Menggunakan Stratified Random Sampling Method dalam Mengestimasi Parameter Populasi ”. JEMI Vol.1, No. 1 Desember 2010.
  27. Sarwono Jonathan. 2006. “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif”. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  28. Spooren P., Mortelmans D. dan Denekens, J. 2007. “Student Evaluation of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: Development of an Instrument Based on 10 Likert-Scales”. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 667-679.
  29. Sultan, P. dan Wong, H.Y. 2012. “Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context a qualitative research approach”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 70-95
  30. Vazquez. 2001. “Expectations: a comparison standard in measuring service quality: an assessment of a reassessment”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 132-9.
  31. Zeithaml V. 1988. “Defining and Relating Price, Perceived Quality and Perceived Value”. Cambrige, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
  32. Zeithaml Valerie A dan Bitner Mary Jo. 2000. “Services Marketing”. Boston: Irwin MC Graw Hill.