Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 8, 2020
Accepted
October 31, 2020
Published
October 31, 2020
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 497 Download : 220

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Kepemimpinan etis muncul sebagai akibat dari berbagai pelanggaran etika dan tuntutan bagi pemimpin untuk dapat mengelola akuntabilitas etis. Penelitian ini menjelaskan mekanisme pengaruh perilaku kepemimpinan etis terhadap voice behavior pada organisasi sektor swasta di Indonesia. Penelitian ini mencoba untuk melihat peran identifikasi organisasional sebagai pemediasi pada pengaruh kepemimpinan etis terhadap voice behavior. Teori pembelajaran, pertukaran sosial, dan  identitas sosial, digunakan sebagai landasan dalam penelitian ini. 131 tanggapan valid dari karyawan ikut ambil bagian dalam penelitian ini. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan perilaku kepemimpinan etis memiliki pengaruh positif pada voice behavior. Selanjutnya, identifikasi organisasional memediasi pengaruh kepemimpinan etis pada voice behavior. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa kepemimpinan etis meningkatkan identifikasi organisasional dan karyawan yang teridentifikasi dengan organisasi memiliki kecenderungan untuk melakukan voice behavior.

Kata kunci: kepemimpinan etis, voice behavior, identifikasi organisasional.

Article Details

License

Please find the rights and licenses in Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen.

1. License

The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User Rights

Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Managament Insight permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Managament Insight on distributing works in the journal.

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain the following rights:

Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

6. Termination

This agreement can be terminated by the author or Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen.

7. Royalties

This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen or its sublicensee.

8. Miscellaneous

Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Managament Insight or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Managament Insight may confirm the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.

Author Biography

Utami Tunjung Sari, Universitas Widya Mataram

Utami Tunjung Sari

Program Studi Kewirausahaan

Universitas Widya Mataram

 

How to Cite
Sari, U. T., Asri, C. P., & Medina, A. K. (2020). PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN ETIS TERHADAP VOICE BEHAVIOR DENGAN IDENTIFIKASI ORGANISASIONAL SEBAGAI PEMEDIASI. Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 15(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.33369/insight.15.2.208-220
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and the organisation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  2. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374.
  3. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: freeman.
  4. Brown, M. E., & Trevin˜ o, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.
  5. Brown, M. E., Trevin˜o, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134
  6. Brown, M. E., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 583–616.
  7. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods, (Twelfth Edition). New York, McGraw-Hill Education.
  8. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?. Academy of Management Journal 50 (4), 869–884.
  9. Ellemers, N., D. De Gilder and S. A. Haslam (2004). ‘Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance’. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459–478.
  10. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.
  11. Hair, F. J., Black, C. W., Babin, J. B., & Anderson, E. R. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. London: Pearson Education Limited.
  12. Hogg, M. A., and D. J. Terry. 2001. Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121–140.
  13. Huang, L., & Paterson, T. A. (2014). Group Ethical Voice Influence of Ethical Leadership and Impact on Ethical Performance. Journal of Management, 01 (4), 45-69.
  14. Janssen, Onne dan Gao, Liping. (2013). Supervisory Responsiveness and Employee Self-Perceived Status and Voice behavior. Journal of Management, 25 (5), 23-45.
  15. Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2013). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 51–69.
  16. Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 189-202.
  17. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1–13.
  18. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to
  19. change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management
  20. Review, 25(4), 706- 725
  21. Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 373-412.
  22. Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173-197
  23. Newman, A., Kiazad, K., Miao, Q., & Cooper, B. (2014). Examining the cognitive and affective trust-based mechanisms underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and organisational citizenship: a case of the head leading the heart? Journal of Business Ethics, 123 (1), 113-123.
  24. Resick, C., Hargis, M., Shao, P., & Dust, S. (2013). Ethical leadership, moral equity judgments, and discretionary workplace behavior. Human Relations, 66, 951–972.
  25. Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. The Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1189–1203
  26. Tu, Yidong., & Lu, Xinxin. (2016). Do Ethical Leaders Give Followers the Confidence to Go the Extra Mile? The Moderating Role of Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Bussiness Ethics, 135:129–144.
  27. Tyler, T. R. (1997). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. In R. I. Sutton, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 21, 201–246 114.
  28. Van Dick, Rolf., Grojean, Michael W., Christ, Oliver, and Wieseke, Jan (2006). Identity and the Extra Mile: Relationships between Organizational Identification and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. British Journal of Management, Vol. 17, 283–301
  29. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J.A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behavior: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.
  30. Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Joireman, J. (2008). In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195-1207
  31. Van Knippenberg, Daan & Sleebos, Ed (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (5): 571–584
  32. Walumbwa, F.O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94,1275–1286.
  33. Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204–213.
  34. Beritasatu.com. (2016). Available at: http://id.beritasatu.com/home/perusahaan-di-indonesia-harus-inovatif-hadapi-persaingan/14907. Ditulis pada: 29 November 2016: 23.14 WIB