Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to find out the variations of teaching and learning based on Bloom’s Taxonomy, this research focused on the classroom learning activities in the lesson plans. This research employed a descriptive qualitative study. The subject of the research was nine lesson plans that developed by teahers at SMPIT IQRA. The data of this research was the classroom learning activities were classified the variations of teaching and learning based on Bloom’s Taxonomy stated in the 2013 Curriculum. The first finding showed that, there were some variations in classroom learning activities of lesson plans. By three domains of learning based on Bloom’s Taxonomy, those are Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor. The teachers were fulfilled the criteria of learning activities in lesson plans. But, the lesson plans still need to increase and remake the team of lesson plans system, because the lesson plans that used by teachers were same to each class in the same level.
Keywords
Article Details
References
- References
- Arikunto, S.(2006). Procedure penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta.
- Ayaturrochim, A., Mulyadi, M., & Elfrida, E. The analysis of reading tasks in “english in focus” textbook based on cognitive domain of revised bloom’s taxonomy (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Bengkulu).
- brown, h. d. 2001. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. white plans. ny: addition wesley longman.
- bondi, j., & wiles, j. (2007). curriculum development, a guide to practice . upper saddle river, new jersey 07458.
- chun, c. w., & morgan, b. (2019). Critical research in english language teaching. second handbook of english language teaching, 1091-1110.
- creswell, j. w. (2010). research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar.
- dwi puspita, annisa. 2015. An analysis of teachers’ lesson plan based on 2013 curriculum. bandung. upi
- fadillah, m. 2014. implementasi kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran sd/mi,
- sd/mts, dan sma/ma. yogyakarta : ar-ruzz
- harmer, jeremy. 2015. the practice of english language teaching. cambridge, uk. pearson education
- indonesia, p. r. (2016). peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republic indonesia no. 22 tahun 2016 tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah.
- Manangsa via, a., gusmuliana, p., & apriani, e. (2020). teaching english by using andragogy approach for efl students. teaching english by using andragogy approach for efl students, 4(03), 386-400.
- Mesquita, A., Oliveira, L., & Sequeira, A. (2019, April). The Future of the Digital Workforce: Current and Future Challenges for Executive and Administrative Assistants. In World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 25-38). Springer, Cham.
- Khofiyah, h. n., & santoso, a. (2019). pengaruh model discovery learning berbantuan media benda nyata terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep ipa. jurnal pendidikan: teori, penelitian, dan pengembangan, 4(1), 61-67.mulyasa, e. 2007. menjadi guru professional menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan. bandung : rosdakarya.
- Miles, m. b. & huberman, m. (1992). analisis data kualitatif. jakarta: penerbit
- universitas indonesia
- Marten, thalia. (2014, may). educational issues in indonesia, the newest curriculum. in internationaleducation2012. retrieved 18th september 2014.
- Ornstein, a., & hunkins, p. (1998). curriculum evaluation. curriculum: foundations, principles, and, (3rd).
- Bussey, t. j., orgill, m., & crippen, k. j. (2013). variation theory: a theory of learning and a useful theoretical framework for chemical education research. chemistry education research and practice, 14(1), 9-22.
- Richards, j. c., & bohlke, d. (2011). creating effective language lessons. new york: cambridge university press.
- Ramsden, p., prosser, m., trigwell, k., & martin, e. (2007). university teachers' experiences of academic leadership and their approaches to teaching. learning and instruction, 17(2), 140-155.
- No, p. (22). tahun 2016. tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah.
References
References
Arikunto, S.(2006). Procedure penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta.
Ayaturrochim, A., Mulyadi, M., & Elfrida, E. The analysis of reading tasks in “english in focus” textbook based on cognitive domain of revised bloom’s taxonomy (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Bengkulu).
brown, h. d. 2001. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. white plans. ny: addition wesley longman.
bondi, j., & wiles, j. (2007). curriculum development, a guide to practice . upper saddle river, new jersey 07458.
chun, c. w., & morgan, b. (2019). Critical research in english language teaching. second handbook of english language teaching, 1091-1110.
creswell, j. w. (2010). research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar.
dwi puspita, annisa. 2015. An analysis of teachers’ lesson plan based on 2013 curriculum. bandung. upi
fadillah, m. 2014. implementasi kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran sd/mi,
sd/mts, dan sma/ma. yogyakarta : ar-ruzz
harmer, jeremy. 2015. the practice of english language teaching. cambridge, uk. pearson education
indonesia, p. r. (2016). peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republic indonesia no. 22 tahun 2016 tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah.
Manangsa via, a., gusmuliana, p., & apriani, e. (2020). teaching english by using andragogy approach for efl students. teaching english by using andragogy approach for efl students, 4(03), 386-400.
Mesquita, A., Oliveira, L., & Sequeira, A. (2019, April). The Future of the Digital Workforce: Current and Future Challenges for Executive and Administrative Assistants. In World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 25-38). Springer, Cham.
Khofiyah, h. n., & santoso, a. (2019). pengaruh model discovery learning berbantuan media benda nyata terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep ipa. jurnal pendidikan: teori, penelitian, dan pengembangan, 4(1), 61-67.mulyasa, e. 2007. menjadi guru professional menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan. bandung : rosdakarya.
Miles, m. b. & huberman, m. (1992). analisis data kualitatif. jakarta: penerbit
universitas indonesia
Marten, thalia. (2014, may). educational issues in indonesia, the newest curriculum. in internationaleducation2012. retrieved 18th september 2014.
Ornstein, a., & hunkins, p. (1998). curriculum evaluation. curriculum: foundations, principles, and, (3rd).
Bussey, t. j., orgill, m., & crippen, k. j. (2013). variation theory: a theory of learning and a useful theoretical framework for chemical education research. chemistry education research and practice, 14(1), 9-22.
Richards, j. c., & bohlke, d. (2011). creating effective language lessons. new york: cambridge university press.
Ramsden, p., prosser, m., trigwell, k., & martin, e. (2007). university teachers' experiences of academic leadership and their approaches to teaching. learning and instruction, 17(2), 140-155.
No, p. (22). tahun 2016. tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah.