Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 29, 2021
Accepted
October 30, 2021
Published
November 1, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 205 Download : 184

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to examine students' perspectives at the university level regarding project-based assessment in writing classes. This research is conduct at one of the universities in Bogor city. Participants in the study numbered eight female students, of whom they had written an academic article before. The method in this study uses qualitative, which uses interviews and documentation in its data collection. The final result obtained is that some students' opinions on project-based assessment include not easy to do, add experience in terms of writing, and take a long time. Benefits of project-based assessment include writing, honing writing skills, and being selective in choosing information—problems faced by students such as lack of time, looking for reference material, and lazy taste.

Keywords

Project-Based assessment students' perspective writing as assessment

Article Details

License
Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Umam, A., & Handini, T. (2021). Students’ Perspective on Project-Based Assessment in Writing Classroom. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 5(4), 504–513. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.5.4.504-513
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al-Badi, I. A. H. (2015). Academic writing difficulties of ESL learners. ResearchGate, August, 63–76.
  2. Arlinawati, Indah Putri; Hermawan, Agus; Chodryah, L. (2017). Development of Project-Based Authentic Assessment Instruments On Business Communication Subjects. Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 3(1), 46–54.
  3. Brown, D. H. (2004). Language Testing Book: Principles and Classroom Practice. In Longman. Longman.
  4. Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865–883.
  5. Creswell, W. J. (2009). Research Design (Third Edition). California: SAGE Publication.
  6. Doppelt, Y. (2005). Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a MECHATRONICS Context. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2).
  7. Goosen, L., & Heerden, D. Van. (2013). Project-Based Assessment Influencing Pass Rates of an ICT Module at an ODL Institution. ResearchGate, November 2018.
  8. Griffee, D. T. (2005). Research Tips: Interview Data Collection Issues and Decisions. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(3), 36–37.
  9. Gülbahar, Y., & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementing Project-Based Learning And E-Portfolio Assessment In an Undergraduate Course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 5191, 309–327.
  10. Hanardi, L. G. (2015). A Project-Based Assessment Model of English for Senior High School Grade X. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies, 1(1), 70–92.
  11. Hassan, N., Zubir, H. A., Akmal, M., Mohzan, M., Halil, A., & Jamil, M. (2021). Washback On Learning : The Experience Of Outcome-Based Assessment In A Higher Learning Institution In Malaysia. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/ Egyptology, 18(4), 3408–3425.
  12. Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2014). Assessment for Learning in the writing classroom: An incomplete realization. Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 210–237.
  13. Jackson, R. L., Drummond, D. K., & Camara, S. (2007). What is qualitative research? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 21–28.
  14. Jaelani, A., & Umam, A. (2021). Preparing EFL pre-service teachers for curriculum 2013 through authentic materials and assessment integration. Journal of English Educators Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.829
  15. Kamalia Hakim, P., & Srisudarso, M. (2020). A Washback Study on Portfolio Assessment. ELT in Focus, 3(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.35706/eltinfc.v3i1.3693
  16. Levy, C. M. (1995). Is writing as difficult as it seems ? Psychonomic Society, Inc., 23(6), 767–779.
  17. Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300302
  18. Murtadho, F. (2021). Metacognitive and critical thinking practices in developing EFL students ’ argumentative writing skills. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 656–666.
  19. Natalia, D. E., Asib, A., & Kristina, D. (2018). The Application of Authentic Assessment for Students Writing Skill. Journal of Education and Human Development, 7(2), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v7n2a5
  20. Nguyen, H., & Filipi, A. (2018). Multiple-Draft/Multiple-Party Feedback Practices in an EFL Tertiary Writing Course: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives. International Education Studies, 11(8), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n8p1
  21. Oshima Ann Hogue, A., Carlson, E., DiLillo, G., Edmonds, C., Le Drean, Linda Moser, L., & Pullman, E. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing THIRD EDITION. In Pearson Education Limited.
  22. Phakiti, A., & Li, L. (2011). General academic difficulties and reading and writing difficulties among Asian ESL postgraduate students in TESOL at an Australian University. RELC Journal, 42(3), 227–264.
  23. Rukmini, D. (2017). The Authentic Assessment To Measure Students ’ English Productive Skills Based On 2013 Curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 263–273.
  24. Schleppegrell, M. J., & Go, A. L. (2007). Analyzing the Writing of English Learners : A Functional Approach. Language Arts, 84(6), 529–538.
  25. Shirzadi, D., & Amerian, M. (2020). Washback effects of multiple-choice, cloze, and metalinguistic tests on EFL students writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23203
  26. Umam, A., & Indah, Y. A. (2020). Exploring In-Service TEYL Teachers ’ Assessment Literacy : Implication for Continuing Professional. Journal of English Educators Society, 5(1), 47–51.
  27. Umamah, A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Indonesian university students ’ self-regulated writing ( SRW ) strategies in writing expository essays. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 25–35.
  28. Van den Bergh, V., Mortelmans, D., Spooren, P., Van Petegem, P., Gijbels, D., & Vanthournout, G. (2006). New Assessment Modes Within Project-Based Education - the Stakeholders. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(4), 345–368.
  29. Wong, K. M., & Mak, P. (2019). Self-assessment in the primary L2 writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 75(2), 183–196.
  30. Yi, J. (2009). Defining Writing Ability for Classroom Writing Assessment in High Schools. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 53–69.
  31. Zhao, J. (2017). Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers. Ampersand, 4, 47–57.