The Correlation between Students’ Digital Literacy and English Communicative Competence

Nur Ekaningsih(1), Cikal Kurnia(2),
(1) Sultan Agung Islamic University, Indonesia
(2) Sultan Agung Islamic University, Indonesia

Abstract


In this globalization era, students are forced to understand the basic knowledge of digital literacy because of the transformation in the learning activity. Therefore, digital literacy also can be the medium to learn and develop students’ English communicative competence. English communicative competence can be accomplished in many ways, but digital literacy is also taking a serious role in it. This study pointed to discover the correlation between students’ digital literacy and English communicative competence. This study used a closed-ended questionnaire and an open-ended interview as instruments for a correlational investigation that was linked to a quantitative study. The participants in this study were fourth-semester UNISSULA English Education understudies. The results of this study revealed a shaky link between students' digital literacy and English communicative skills. It was established that the correlational coefficient value was less than the r table score of 0.350 0.432, which is between 0.20 and 0.399 in terms of correlation coefficient interpretation. It can be described that the correlation coefficient between students’ digital literacy and English communicative competence is weak. Although the correlation was weak, but digital literacy had an essential impact on students’ English communicative competence. Then, it can also be said that H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected.


Keywords


Correlation; Digital Literacy; English Communicative Competence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayhan, B. (2019). Digital Literacy. January 2016. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-07022-4/10

Buckingham, D. (2016). Defining digital literacy: What do young people need to know about digital media? August.

Ekaningsih, N. (2019). Semantic Mapping Combined To Chunking Technique for Better Students’ Literacy Ability. 3rd UNNES–TEFLIN National Seminar SEMANTIC, 94–100.

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Frankel, K. K., Becker, B. L. C., Rowe, M. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2016). From “What is Reading?” to What is Literacy? Journal of Education, 196(3), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600303

Gunantar, D. A. (2016). the Impact of English As an International Language on English Language Teaching in Indonesia. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 10(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v10i2.5621

Hasnunidah, N. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan : komponen MKDK. 118.

Hermawan, S. (2017). Instrumen penelitian a. pengertian instrumen penelitian. Instrumen Penelitian.

Levinsen, K. T., & Sørensen, B. H. (2015). 1 . Digital Literacy and Subject Matter Learning. 2012.

Lolang, E. (2015). ) yaitu hipotesis yang akan diuji. Biasanya, hipotesis ini merupakan pernyataan yang menunjukkan bahwa suatu parameter populasi memiliki nilai tertentu. 3, 685–695.

Nishanthi, R. (2018). The Importance of Learning English in Today World. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, Volume-3(Issue-1), 871–874. https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd19061

Rao, P. S. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Reserach Journal of English (RJOE), 4(January), 65–79. https://www.rjoe.org.in/vol4iss1.html

Roberts, P., & Priest, H. (2006). Reliability and validity in research. Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 20(44), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2006.07.20.44.41.c6560

Roopa, S., & Rani, M. (2012). Questionnaire Designing for a Survey. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(4_suppl1), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974909820120509s

Sopandi, W., Widya, R. N., & Yugafiat, R. (2019). Literacy in The Context of Communication Skills for The 21st Century Teacher Education in Primary School Student. 3(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v3i1.32462

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung. In Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D) (p. 308).

Surya Dharma, MPA., P. . (2008). Pendekatan, jenis, dan metode penelitian pendidikan.

Tarvin, L. D. (2014). Communicative Competence: Its Definition , Connection to Teaching , and Relationship with Interactional Competence. November, 38. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3214.2807

Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., & Jumbo, F. T. (2020). Digital literacy and higher education during COVID-19 lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. Publications, 8(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8040048

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/jtjik/article/download/2100/1544




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.6.1.57-72

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 0 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET) is Indexed in

     

Creative Commons LicenseJournal of English Education and Teaching is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.