Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 4, 2022
Accepted
April 12, 2022
Published
April 14, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 195 Download : 203

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to describe the effectiveness of contextual learning models of creative writing based on the literary ecology of Indonesian Language and Literature Study (PBSI) students at Education Faculty (FKIP) Muhammadiyah University of Tangerang. The research method used in this research is Research and Development (R&D). The population in this study were all students of the Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program in Academic Year 2020/2021 of semester VII who have taken Creative Writing courses while the sample in this study were 20 students of the Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program of Muhammadiyah University of Tangerang. The results of this study showed that after pre-test and post-test trials in creative writing courses based on literary ecology in PBSI students at FKIP Muhammadiyah University of Tangerang the learning model used had positive results and had a significant increase the students’ poetry writing skills. This can be seen in the results of the pretest signification test obtained an average of 3.5 and post-test results obtained an average of 7.05. Therefore, researchers can conclude that the learning model developed by researchers in creative writing courses based on literary ecology is feasible and effectively to be used. The learning model made was final and has fulfilled the requirements to be implemented in the classroom.

Keywords

contextual learning model creative writing literary ecology poetry

Article Details

License
Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Anggraini, N., Nurudin, N., & Rohman, S. (2022). The Effectiveness of Learning Model of Contextual Writing Poetry Based on Literary Ecology. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 6(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.6.1.142-157
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Chandra ,Afry Adi. (2017). Ekokritik dalam cerpen Indonesia mutakhir. Jurnal Pena Indonesia, 3(2), 42–58. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/1704Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021.
  2. Ernawati, O. D., & Utami, S. P. (2017). Keefektifan pembelajaran menulis kreatif puisi menggunakan teknik akroisitik dan teknik latihan terbimbing dengan media video keindahan alam untuk kelas vii SMP Negeri 22 Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Satra Indonesia, 1(2), 128–135
  3. Farida, Devi Nur (2017). Kritik ekologi sastra puisi Perempuan Lereng Gunung karya Ika Permata Hati dalam antologi puisi Perempuan di Ujung Senja melalui ekofeminisme Susan Griffin. Basindo: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, SAstra Indonesia Dan Pembelajarannya, 283. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/basindo/article/view/2297. Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021.
  4. Glotfelty, Cheryll and Harold Fromm. (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. In The University Of Georgia Press Athens And London.
  5. Handiwiguna, R., Mila, F. H., & Firmansyah, D. (2018). Pembelajaran menganalisis menulis puisi dengan menggunakan pendekatan imajinatif 1. 1, 577–584. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/parole/article/view/955. Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021
  6. Juliana. (2016). Lingkungan berdasarkan gender dan tingkat pendidikan di Kota Pekanbaru. Marwah, Vol. XV(No.2), 232–253. http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/marwah/article/view/2650. Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021.
  7. Karmila, N. P., Gunatama, G., Sutresna, I. B., & Bahasa, P. (2017). Peningkatan kemampuan menulis puisi melalui model inspirator gambar peristiwa siswa kelas vii a SMPN 1 Melaya tahun pelajaran 2016 / 2017. e-Journal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPBS/article/view/8686. Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021.
  8. Ken Hyland. (2003). Second language writing. In Jack C. Richards (Ed.), Cambridge Language Education. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  9. Kholipah, S. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan menulis puisi melalui model pembelajaran dengan inspirator gambar peristiwa. Jurnal Komunitas Bahasa, Vol. 6, No. 1, April 2018, 6(1), 18–25.
  10. L. R. Gay, Geoffrey E. Mills, P. A. (2012). Educational research (tenth edit). Pearson Education, Inc. https://yuli-elearning.com/pluginfile.php/4831/mod_resource/content/1/Gay-E%20Book%20Educational%20Research-2012.pdf. Accessed at 17 November 2021.
  11. Nurjannah. (2017). Penerapan pendekatan dalam meningkatkan keterampilan menulis puisi pada siswa SDN1 Lalebbata kelas vb Kecamatan Wara Kota Palopo. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 03, 299–306. https://journal.uncp.ac.id/index.php/proceding/article/view/799. Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021.
  12. Nugroho. (2013). Keefektifan pembelajaran menulis puisi. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/1319. Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021
  13. Rahmawati, Ima Siti. (2015). Penerapan model kontekstual dalam pembelajaran menulis karangan deskripsi. 37–53. http://jurnal.unma.ac.id/index.php/dl/article/view/430. Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021.
  14. Ripai, A. (2012). Pengembangan teknik berpikir berpasangan berbagi pembelajaran menulis teks drama yang bermuatan nilai-nilai pendidikan karakter pada mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Seloka - Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v1i2.700. Accessed at 4 Oktober 2021.
  15. Rahmawati, I. S. (2015). Penerapan model dalam pembelajaran menulis karangan deskripsi. 37–53. Jurnal Diglosia. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/1319. Accessed at 15 Oktober 2021.
  16. Sanjaya, Wina. (2016). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. jakarta: prenamaedia group.
  17. Septian, Y., Ruhimat, M., & Somantri, L. (2016). Perilaku ramah lingkungan peserta didik SMA Bandung. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 16(2), 71–81. Retrieved from http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/gea/article/download/4678/4715.Accessed at 12 Oktober 2021.
  18. Tompodung, T. C. G., Rushayati, S. B., & Aidi, M. N. (2018). Efektivitas program adiwiyata terhadap perilaku ramah lingkungan warga sekolah di Kota Depok. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), 8(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.8.2.170-177. Accessed at 12 Oktober 2021.
  19. Trianton, T. (2008). Problem pengajaran sastra di SMK. INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 13(3), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v13i3.306. Accessed at 10 Oktober 2021.
  20. Wang, C., Chang, C., Lin, K., & Chen, G. (2018). Effectiveness of web-based mechanism for teaching creative writing in the classroom. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 3297(May), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1464940.
  21. Wahyuti, N. (2009). Penerapan model pembelajaran kuantum untuk meningkatkan keterampilan menulis puisi. An-Nuha Vol. 2, No. 1, Juli 2015, 39, 67–78. https://www.scribd.com/document/484515342/32-Article-Text-140-1-10-20160807. Accessed at 1 November 2021.
  22. Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2019). Evaluasi program pembelajaran : Panduang praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik (X). Pustaka Pelajar
  23. Widianti, Ande Wina. (2017). Kajian ekologi sastra dalam kumpulan cerpen pilihan Kompas 2014 “Di Tubuh Tarra dalam Rahim Pohon.” Jurnal Diksastrasia, 1, 203–211. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/diksatrasia/article/view/576. Accessed at 7 Oktober 2021.