Main Article Content

Abstract

The research is aimed  at  finding out the politeness  strategies  based on Brown and Levinson politeness strategies theory that used by the members of UKM Debat, the University of Bengkulu when practice debate. The subject of this research was the members of UKM Debat, the University of Bengkulu that consist of eight students. This research was using descriptive qualitative as the methodology and the data were collected by using transcript from video recorder and observation sheet as the instruments. The result of data analysis shows that the debaters use all of politeness strategies but they do not used all sub strategies when practice debate, which is bald on record, positive politeness strategy, negative politeness strategy, and off record. There were 28 utterances that consist of politeness strategy. The debaters mostly applied positive politeness strategy, which occurs 19 times (67,8%). Bald on record and off record occur 4 times (14,3%) and the last is negative politeness strategy which occurs 1 times (3,6%). Positive politeness strategy gets  the  highest  position  in  the  data  because  in  practicing  debate,  all debaters have known each other and have a close relationship

Keywords

debate politeness strategy

Article Details

How to Cite
Ayuningrum, A., Pulungan, R., & S, S. (2019). AN ANALYSIS OF POLITENESS STRATEGIES APPLIED BY THE MEMBERS OF UKM DEBAT,THE UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 2(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.2.4.1-8

References

  1. Brown and Levinson. 1987.
  2. Politeness Some Universals in Languages Usage. London: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Gaspie, Renaldo. 2014. Politeness
  4. Strategies in Disagreement
  5. used by English Department Students of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Publication Article. School of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
  6. Holmes, Janet. 2013. An
  7. Introduction to Sociolinguistics: fourth edition. New York. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  8. Latifatun Na’imah, Anni. 2017.
  9. Politeness Strategies performed by Contestants in the Second US Presidential Debate. Thesis. English Education Department, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Tulungagung.
  10. Leech, G. 1983. Principles of
  11. Pragmatics. New York: Longman Group UK Ltd.
  12. Norra, R.N. 2015. An Analysis of
  13. Politeness Strategies in Her
  14. Movie. Thesis. English Letters Department, Letters and Humanities Faculty, State Islamic University (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.
  15. Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York. Harcourt, Brace. Reprint: Dover Books on Language, 2004.
  16. Sari, D.M. 2014. A Socio-Pragmatic
  17. Analysis of Politeness Strategies Performed by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Debate Held on February 26,
  18. Thesis. English
  19. Language and Literature
  20. Study Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Yogyakarta State University.
  21. Sugiyono. 2002. Metode Penelitian
  22. Administrasi. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
  23. Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics.
  24. Oxford: Oxford University
  25. Press.