Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates EFL high school students’ self reflection of teacher’s corrective feedback on pronunciation errors. The methodology of this research was qualitative which used case study as a research design. The data were collected from classroom observation, semi-structured interview of one English teacher, and questionnaire of twenty five students at eleventh grade. The findings revealed that the students’ self reflection could be seen when the teacher providing the corrective feedback. The students could be aware that they often do the errors in pronouncing English because of the difficulties of using English. However, the teacher’s feedback was directed the students to learn about how to pronounce English properly. The researchers conclude that by using self-reflection, the students would be aware of their strength and weakness. Furthemore, it supports self motivated, self-awareness, self-observation, self-analysis, and self-evaluation of the students in pronouncing English. Finally, the researchers suggest that self-reflection can integrate into the other aspects such as writing, reading, and listening. Thus, the students can get the valuable learning process.

Keywords

Reflection Feedback Pronunciation

Article Details

How to Cite
Agustuna, N. E., Herlina, R., & Faridah, D. (2019). Corrective Feedback on Pronunciation Errors: Teacher’s Perception and EFL High School Students’ Self-Reflection. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.3.3.311-327

References

  1. Bolton, G. 2010. Reflective Practice: writing & professional development (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
  2. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. 1985. Reflection: turning experience into learning. London: Rotledge & Kogan. p. 19.
  3. Burns, A., and Claire. 1994. Clearly speaking pronunciation in action for teachers. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
  4. Cresswell, J. 2012. Educational Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  5. Dewey, J. 1991. How we think. NY: Prometheus Books
  6. Fraenkel et al. 2007. How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). San Franscisco: McGraw Hill Companies Inc.
  7. Gibbs. 1998. Learning by doing.
  8. Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The practice of english language teaching (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
  9. Hattie, John & Helen, Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, pp. 81-112.
  10. Julia, G. 2002. Introducing English rhytem in chinese EFL classroom. Australia 3(1), p. 26.
  11. Klimova, B. F. 2014. Self reflection in the course evaluation. Journal of social behavioral sciences. pp. 141.
  12. Lewis, Marylin. 2002. Giving feedback in language.
  13. Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. 1999. How language are learned (Revised Ed.). UK: Oxford University Press.
  14. Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. 2013. Corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching. pp. 141-160.
  15. Mendez, E. H., Arguelles, L. G., & Castro, A. B. 2010. Corrective feedback: some ways to go about it, 9, pp. 254-270.
  16. Moon, J. A. 1999. A handbook of reflective and experiental learning. London: Routledge. p. 74.
  17. Quinton, S. & Smallbone, T. 2010. Feeding forward: using feedback to promote student reflection and learning – a teaching model. Inovation in Education and Teaching International.
  18. Nunan, D., & Balley, K.M. 2009. Exploring second language classroom research . Sherrire Rochr.
  19. Tungtao, Y. 2010. A teacher’s corrective feedback in a freshman english class. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 10. pp. 88-111.