Corrective Feedback on Pronunciation Errors: Teacher’s Perception and EFL High School Students’ Self-Reflection

Rafki Okta Arianto(1),
(1) Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup, Indonesia


This study aimed to find out whether there is any effect of peer feedback through instagram on student’s writing recount text at the tenth grade students of SMA 4 Rejang Lebong. Quasi-experimental design, since two classes are taken as the sample of the study with 36 students X IPA 1 and 34 students X IPA 3. Which class experimental class and a controlled class. The experimental class is taught by doing peer feedback through instagram while the controlled class do not. Moreover, this research is conducted through the following procedures; pretest, treatments, and post-test. The data analyzed is gained through writing test. There was significant different between the students who taught by peer feedback through instagram and those who were taught by conventional teaching. It can be seen from the post-test result. The mean score in experimen class was 75,67 and the mean score in control class was 67,38. From the result of t tesr was obtained 3,03 while t table was 1,67. It was proved that t test obtained was higher than t table (3,03>1,67) which the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and the hypothesis (H1) is accepted. Finally, it can be concluded that peer feedback through instagram is effective toward students’ writing ability in Recount text.


Peer feedback; Instagram; Recount Text

Full Text:



Adrienne Gear. (2014) . Nonfiction Writing Power.Markham: Pembroke Publisher.

Anderson Mark and Anderson Kathy. (1998) . Text Types in English 3.South Yarra:Macmillan Education Australia.

Apriani, Eka. (2017) . Ultilzing Preservice English Teacher Strategis and Classroom Managementat Junior High School in Rejang Lebong Regancy”.Vol 1 No 2. English Franca: STAIN Curup.

Barkley.E.F., Cross.K.P & Major C.H. (2005) . Collaborative Learning Techniques.San Fransisco:Jossey-Bass.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2002) . The Practice of English Language Teaching 3rd Edition. London: Longman.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). How to Teach English New Edition,(New York: Pearson education limited.

Jette G Hansen and Juni Liu, (2005) . ”Guiding principles for Effective Peer Response”, ELT Journal volume 59 :Oxford University Press.

Kelly, R. (2015) . An Exploration of Instagram to Develop ESL Leaners Writing Proficlency Unpiblished Master’s Dissertation :British Council Ulster University.

Melisa M. Nelson and Christian D. Schunn. (2008) . The Nature of Feedback: How Different Types of Peer Feedback Affect Writing Performance :Springer.

Nicol, D, and Macfarlane Dick. (2006) . Formative Assessment and Self-regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice, Studies in Higher.Education.Vol.31(2).

Thomas S.Kane. (2000) . The Oxford The Essential Guide to Writing.New York: Berkley Books.

Topping, K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000) . Formative peer assessment of Journal of academic writing between postgraduate students.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2).

Tsui, A. B., & Ng.M. (2000) . Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing.

Yarrow, F. and Topping K. J. (2001) . Collaborative Learning: The Effects of Metacognitive Prompting and Structured Peer Interaction :British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 0 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET) is Indexed in


Creative Commons LicenseJournal of English Education and Teaching is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.