Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of this research were to find out how cultural dimensions were displayed, what culture was the most dominant, and the percentage of local culture in textbooks used at SMA IT IQRA? (Pathway to English) and SMK N1 Grade X (Bahasa Inggris by KEMENDIKBUD) Bengkulu. This research applied content analysis study with descriptive qualitative analysis. The procedures used in data collection were document review and observation. In analysing the data, the concept by Mile and Huberman was applied. The study revealed that from the two textbooks, there was a difference in terms of dominance in cultural types and dimensions. In Pathway to English, there was38 % items of aesthetic sense, 32% of pragmatic sense, and 26% of sociological sense. Semantic sense had the least representation which was only 4%. In cultural types, there was (50%) for target culture, 44% for local culture, and 6% for international culture. As for Bahasa Inggris by KEMENDIKBUD, there was 44% for asthetic sense, 25% for sociological sense, 22% for aesthetic sense, and 8% for semantic sense. Local culture has most items to occur, which reached 47 percent, followed by target culture which was 41%. The last is international culture with 11% of occurrence. It is highly recommendable that teachers apply the books with more cultural dimensions and types to hep students broaden their cultural knowledge and awareness.

Keywords

textbooks Culture dimensions Cultural types.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mustofa, M. I., & Martina, F. (2019). The Analysis of Cultural Content in Two EFL Textbooks Used at SMA IT Iqra’ And SMKN 1 Bengkulu City. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(4), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.3.4.481-493

References

  1. Adaskou, Kheira et al. (1990). Design Decisions on The Cultural Content of a Secondary English Course for Morocco. In ELT Journal Volume 44/1.
  2. Akbar, Rizky.An Analysis of Selected Eleventh Grade English Textbooks. Journal of English and Education 2016, 4(1), 110.
  3. Ali Shreeb, Mohsin. An Analysis if Cultural Content of Iraqi EFL Textbooks. Journal University of Kerbala. 15(1) Humainies. 2017.
  4. Alptekin, Cem. Towards interculturalcommunicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal. 56(1) January 2002 ©Oxford University Press.
  5. Barfield, Susan C. and Uzarski, Joëlle.2009. English Teaching Forum.
  6. Brown. (2001). Organizational Culture. London: Pitman.
  7. Callahan, D. 1966.The Question of Public Dishonesty.Counseling andvalue.
  8. Corbet, J. (2003). "Language for International Communication and Education : Intercultural Approach to English Language Teaching". http://site.Ebrary.Com/lib/Jyvaskyla/ Doc?id.
  9. Cortazzi, M. & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural Mirror: Materials and methods in the EFL Classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York:Cambridge University Press.
  10. Crossman, Ashley. December 13, 2011.https://www.thoughtco.com/custom-definition-3026171
  11. Cunningsworth, A. Evaluating and Selecting EFL Teaching Materials.(Great Britain: Biddles Ltd, 1984), p 1.
  12. Duranti (1997). Linguistics Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Durmaz, Mehmet “Tracing the local culture in a reading book”. Journal of Languages and Culture. Vol.8(9) 2017, 142.
  14. Giordano, Gerard . Twentieth-century textbook wars. A history of advocacy and apposition. Frankfurt.
  15. Horibe. (2008). "The Place of Culture in Teaching English as an International Language (EIL)". JALT Journal, 30(2), 243.
  16. James and A. Banks, Cherry. 2009. Multikultural Education Issues and Perspectives. River Street, Holoken, NJ USA: John Waley and Sons. INC.
  17. James, William. 1917. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Longmans.
  18. Johnson (1993). Textbooks in the Kaleidoscope: A Critical Survey of Literature and Research on Educational Texts. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
  19. Julie S. Amberg and Deborah J. Vause. .American English: History, Structure, and Usage. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Kawano, Madoka. (1987). "An Analysis of Cultural Contents of High School Textbooks in Japan". MA. Thesis. The University of British Columbia.
  21. Kramsch (1998). Language and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Meyer, Jim. What is Literature? Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session 1997 Volume 41.
  23. Musteata, Sergiu. 2011. How to Analyze Textbooks, An Essay on Research Approaches and Possible Consequences of Research. Bucharest:New Europe College.
  24. Nur, Ihsan Faris, “Cultural Content Analysis of an English Textbook for Senior High School Grade three in Cianjur, West Java”. Jurnal of English and Education. Vol 2 (2) 2014, 14.
  25. Pasassung. (2003). Teaching English in an "Acquisition-Poor Environment": An Ethnographic Example of a Remote Indonesian EFL Classroom. Thesis Unpublished Materials Submitted to Department of Linguistics University of Sydney.
  26. Rahimpour & Hashemi, 2011. As cited in Rizky Akbar. “An Analysis of Selected Eleventh Grade English Textbooks.” Journal of English and Education 2016, 4(1), 111.
  27. Royani, Miftah. The Use of Local Culture Texts for Enthusiastic English Reading Teaching. The International Journal of Sciences. 30 Jan 2013 vol 7(1).
  28. Sitoresmi, Woro Endah. 2017. THESIS: A Cultural Content Analysis of EFL Textbooks – CHALLENGE Series: 2, 3, AND 4 Published by PEARSON. UIN JAKARTA.
  29. Sudartini, Siti dkk. 2012. Pengembangan Buku Ajar Bahasa Inggris SMP Berbasis Multikultural Sebagai Upaya Mempertahankan Budaya Lokal. Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni UNY.
  30. Sudartini, Siti. Inserting Local Culture in English Language Teaching to Promote Character Education. Faculty of Language and Arts Sciences Yogyakarta State University. P.14.
  31. Sutrisno. Upaya Mewujudkan Generasi Emas melalui Kurikulum 2013,Paper presented in National Seminar: Bedah Kurikulum 2013; Repositioning Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) untuk Mewujudkan Generasi Emas. On Saturday, June 15, 2013. Kediri: Program Pascasarjana STAIN Kediri, 2013.
  32. Tomlinson & Sousa. (2011). Differentiation and the Brain: How Neuroscience Supports the Learner- Friendly Classroom. Ingram Distribution. Kindle Edition.
  33. Tompson. (1990). Ideology and Modern Culture. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
  34. Vos, Liza. 2018. Teaching Intercultural Communicative Competence alongside Language Proficiency.
  35. Wong. (2009). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. TESL Reporter, 42(1), 52-75.
  36. Xiao, Jing. Cultural Contents of an in-use EFL Textbook and English Major Students’ Attitudes and Perception towards Culture Learning. University of Science and Technology, China, 2010, 2.
  37. Young and Sercombe (2010), as quoted in M. Kojour. (2016). Intercultural Communicative Competence: A Brief Review of Current Thinking and Literature.International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies.4(4), 12-20.Retrieved from www.eltsjournal.org