Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 22, 2018
Accepted
March 24, 2019
Published
March 29, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 386 Download : 473

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The C.A.F.E. Practices aims to ensure that coffee is produced  from sustainable farming and process by evaluating economic, social, and environmental aspects in the production process. Incentive for farmers following the certification will get better price than those not following certification. This research aims to analyze factors influencing farmer to participate in C.A.F.E. certification. After then, the economic effect of the certification will be analyzed using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) based on significant factors that influence farmers to participate in the certification. To reach that aims, a survey is conducted to 162 Lintong coffee farmers, consisting of 81 people who participate in certification and 81 people who do not participate in the certification. PSM in this research is conducted through psmatch 2 and the nearest neighbor method. Based on the logit analysis, some factors like famers’ age, area, the number of family member, and income outside coffee farming significantly influence farmers’ participation in the certification. The analysis on the effect of certification based on psmatch 2 and the nearest neighbor method after balancing test shows that the variable costs is increase significantly, while the increase in productivity and coffee farming income was not significant.

Keywords

Coffee certification coffee farmers Propensity Score Matching (PSM)

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2019 sonitia verawati sinaga, Harianto Harianto, Suharno Suharno

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Sinaga, S. V., Harianto, H., & Suharno, S. (2019). ANALISIS PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING DAMPAK EKONOMI SERTIFIKASI C.A.F.E. PRACTICES PADA USAHATANI KOPI LINTONG SUMATERA UTARA. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 18(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.18.1.139-152
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ardiyani, Erdiansyah. 2012. Sertifikasi Kopi Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jember, Indonesia. Warta Pusat Penelitian Kakao dan Kopi di Indonesia.
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016. Statistik Kopi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2017. Luas Tanaman dan Produksi Kopi Arabika Tanaman Perkebunan Rakyat menurut Kabupaten/Kota 2017. Tersedia pada https://sumut.bps.go.id
  4. Conservation International. 2012. C.A.F.E. Practices Results Assessment Fiscal Years 2011-2012. Tersedia pada http://www.conservation.org/publications DeFries, R.S., Fanzo,
  5. J., Mondal, P., Remans, R., Wood, S.A. 2017. Is voluntary certification of tropical agricultural commodities achieving sustainability goals for small-scale producers? a review of the evidence. Environ Research Letter. 12(3):124-146.
  6. Haggar, J., Soto, G., Casanoves, F., & Virginio, E.d.M. 2017. Environmental Economic Benefits and Trade-offs on Sustainably Certified Coffee Farms. Ecological Indicators, 79(4), 330–337. doi:
  7. 1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.023
  8. Hosmer, D.W., and Lemeshow, S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression . New Jersey, United states: John Wiley & Sns, Inc.
  9. Nugroho, P., Firdaus, M., Asmara, A. 2018. Pengaruh Standar Keamanan Pangan terhadap Ekspor Produk Biofarmaka Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 6(1), 41-57.
  10. Purba, O.M. , Toekidjo, J. P. 2013. Produktivitas Kopi Arabika (Coffea arabica L.) Rakyat di Kecamatan Raya Kabupaten Simalungun. Vegetalika, 1(2), 67-77.
  11. Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B. 1984. Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 (387), 516-524.
  12. Saragih, J.R. (2016). Produksi Kopi Arabika Spesialti Sumatera Utara : Analisis Sosial Ekonomi, Ekologi, dan Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah. www.usi.ac.id/karya ilmiah dosen.
  13. Sepulveda, W.S., Chekmam, L., Maza, M.T., Mancilla, N.O. 2016. Consumers' preference for the origin and quality attributes associated with production of specialty coffees: Results from a cross-cultural study. Food Research International, 89, 997-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.03.039
  14. Vellema, W., Casanova, A.B., Gonzalez, C, D’Haese, M. 2015. The Effect of Specialty Coffee Certification on Household Livelihood Strategies and Specialisation. Food Policy, 57 (9),13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.003