Main Article Content

Abstract

Mathematical competence abilities of elementary education students play an important role in the success of learning mathematics in elementary schools. The purpose of this study was to describe an increase in students' understanding of mathematical concepts through a manipulative assisted investigative approach. The research subjects were students of the first semester elementary  teachers education postgrade students who took Elementary  education mathematics courses in the 2019/2020 academic year. This research is a classroom action research using data collection methods in the form of observation and tests results. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using data reduction and data triangulation. The results showed that the application of investigative learning increased the ability to understand deep mathematical concepts. The manipulative assisted mathematical investigative approach increases students in carrying out exploration, making assumptions, and making conclusions.

Keywords

investigation manipulative mathematical competence

Article Details

How to Cite
Susanta, A. S. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Kompetensi Matematika Pendidikan Dasar melalui Pendekatan Investigasi Berbantuan Manipulatif. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.33369/dikdas.v4i1.13874

References

  1. A,I (2015) Investigasi dalam proses pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal al-Khwarizmi, Volume III, Edisi 2, Oktober 2015, Hal. 57 – 62
  2. Arslan, C. & Yavus G (2012) A study on mathematical literacy self-efficacy
  3. beliefs of propspective teachers. Procedia Social and behaviour sciences
  4. (2012) 5622-56255
  5. Baily, J (2014) Mathematical Investigations for Supporting Preservice Primary Teachers Repeating a Mathematics Education Course Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Vol 39, 2, February 2014
  6. Boaler (2002) Experiencing school mathematics traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact in Student learning. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Firbaum.
  7. Boaler (2008) Promoting “Relation Equity” and high achievement through an innovatives mixed ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, vol 34, no 2.
  8. Cankoy, O & Darbaz, S. (2010). Effect Problem Possing Based on Problem
  9. Solving Instruction on Understanding Problem. Journal of Education 38,
  10. Diperoleh 17)April 2012, dari http: //
  11. efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/english/.../OS MAN%20CANKOY.pdf
  12. Freudenthal, H. 1991. Revisiting Mathematics Education. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  13. J Nitko. (2001). Eductional Assessment of Student. Upper Saddle River, New
  14. Jersey. Penerbit Prentice Hal Inc
  15. Moyer. P (2001) Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach
  16. mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 47: 175-197, 2001. ?
  17. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherland
  18. Silver, E.A., & Cai.J (1996) An Analysisi of arithmetics problem posing by middle school students. Journal for reseearch in Mathematics Education, 27. Pp. 521-532.
  19. Sowell, (1989) Effect of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 20 No. 5 498-505
  20. Suydam, M.N. (1986). Manipulative Materials and Achievement. Arithmetic Teacher, 33(2), pp.83-90.
  21. Thompson, P.W.1992, 'Notations, conventions and constraints: Contributions to effective uses of concrete materials in elementary mathematics'. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 23(2), 123-147.
  22. Yeo, J. B. W. (2017). Mathematical Investigation: Task, Process, adm Activity. Technical Report ME2009-01 January 2009Mathematics and Mathematics Education National Institute of Education Singapore