Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the feasibility of EFS instructional material developed for ASTRI Budi Luhur students. The research was designed as qualitative and quantitative (mixed) approach. The method used in this study was the Delphi method, and the data were collected through questionnaires and interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed based on eligibility categories while qualitative data were analyzed to draw conclusions. The feasibility of the product of this research was examined by two experts in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and instructional materials. The result showed that the instructional material was feasible with several improvements. Product feasibility test in this research was carried out three times. Each test was carried out after revising the draft of instructional materials based on input provided by the experts. In the last feasibility test, the experts gave a score of 3.7 for the syllabus and 3.7 for the developed instructional material, indicating that both the syllabus and EFS instructional material developed were very feasible to be applied in EFS learning in ASTRI Budi Luhur Jakarta.

Keywords

Feasibility Test Syllabus Instructional Material Moodle

Article Details

Author Biography

Didik Hariyadi Raharjo, Akademi Sekretari Budi Luhur

Student of doctoral degree State University of Jakarta
How to Cite
Raharjo, D. H. (2020). FEASIBILITY TEST OF ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR SECRETARIES THROUGH MOODLE. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 5(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i2.10753

References

  1. Al-Tabany, T. I. B. (2014). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif, progresif, dan kontekstual. In Prenadamedia Group.
  2. Beth, L. (2019). TLM: Teaching/Learning Materials. Retrieved from: https://www.thoughtco.com/tlm-teaching-learning-materials-2081658
  3. Celce. M. & Murcia E. O. (2000). Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. New York: Combridge University Press
  4. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. In e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning: Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255971
  5. Cresswell, J. W., Plano-Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research.
  6. Genova, M.M. (2019). Designing an effective digital learning environment for teaching english through literature: the learning experience of bulgarian students. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society. Vol. 15, n.2, ISSN: 1826-6223 | eISSN: 1971-8829
  7. Giri, P., Artini, L. P., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2018). Natural Approach in English Classes in Primary Schools: Teachers’ Perception and Implementation. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v6i2.2709
  8. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1988). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach. The Modern Language Journal, 72(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.2307/327576
  9. Liao, H. C., & Hsu, L. (2014). Using an analytical rubric to improve the writing of EFL college students. Asian EFL Journal.
  10. Mahajan, V., Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1976). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150755
  11. Martins, C. G. D. F. M., Levis, J. M., & Borges, V. M. C. (2016). The design of an instrument to evaluate software for EFL/ESL pronunciation teaching. Ilha Do Desterro. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n1p141
  12. McGrath, I. (2013). (2013). Instructional materials and the Roles of EFL/ESL Teachers: Practice and Theory. New Delhi: Bloomsbury Academic
  13. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. In Task-Based Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667336
  14. Nurhamsih, Y., & Syahrial, S. (2018). Evaluation of English Teaching Materials used at a Vocational High School Based on Cunningsworth’s Checklist. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature). https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v3i2.6830
  15. Quintero, E. F. G., Guzmán, N. P. T., & Guzmán, R. R. (2017). Assessing EFL university students’ writing: A study of score reliability. Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2017.19.2.928
  16. Rahamdina, Alamsyah. H & Sofyan D. (2019). Need analysis of english for tour and travel department of vocational high school in bengkulu city. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), Vol. 4(1),doi: 10.33369/joall.v4i1.6303
  17. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics. In Proceedings of the 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Society (APWSS) Conference, 2-6 October 2007, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
  18. Rusman. (2012). Model-model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. In Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  19. Salisna, R., Harahap, A., & Sofyan, D. (2019). Need analysis of english for tour and travel department of vocational high school in bengkulu city. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature). https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v4i1.6303
  20. Sugiyono, P. D. (2016) Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif,dan R&D. , Alfabeta, cv.
  21. Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: principles and procedures of materials development. In Materials Development in Language Teaching.
  22. Wulandari, M. (2015). Moodle-Based Learning Model for Paragraph Writing Class. Language and Language Teaching Journal. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2015.180201
  23. Yatimah, Durotul. (2009). Sekretaris Modern. Jakarta: Eska Media