Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 20, 2020
Accepted
June 19, 2020
Published
August 13, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 337 Download : 186

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Teachers provide students with corrective feedback for guiding them in the process of teaching a language. This study aimed to investigate the types of corrective feedback that the teacher used in teaching writing recount text, this also employed to reveal the students' motivation for writing recount texts, and to explore the benefit of teacher corrective feedback to the students' ability in writing recount text at Manbaul Huda Islamic Junior High School Central Java Indonesia. Descriptive qualitative method was employed by interviewing both the teacher and the second-year students. The participants were three teachers and twenty students. There were three guided Interview questions for teachers and two questions for students. The findings of this study turned out that the teacher employed indirect corrective feedback and gave symbols to the student’s error production. Most of the students are highly motivated to be able to write a status on Facebook or other online media by using English. The most important advantage of obtaining corrective feedback for the students is to understand the use of grammar in making a sentence. This study concluded that the motivation of the students to write recount text was to get teacher corrective feedback to be able to write the appropriate sentence and to increase their ability in writing English. This also implied that different types of corrective feedback might impact differently to the students in improving their motivation to learn English more.

Keywords

EFL Learners Indirect corrective feedback Secondary school writing

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Suharyanti, E. M., & Fauziati, E. (2020). WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON EFL STUDENTS AT AN ISLAMIC JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 5(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i2.11207
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abuseileek, A. F. (2013). Using track changes and word processor to provide corrective feedback to learners in writing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12004
  2. Akmal, & Mahrup. (2019). Direct-unfocused-corrective feedback: A model for improving writing skills. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(11), 206–220.
  3. AR, N. (2018). Effects of Corrective Feedback on Students ’ Linguistic Errors. International Journal of Education & Curriculum Application, 1(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v1i2.2147
  4. Astia, M. (2018). Corrective Feedback in English Class. Center of Language and Culture Studies, 3(3), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.30957/ijotl-tl.v3i3.502
  5. Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. New York: Routledge Taylor and francish Group.
  6. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
  7. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principle An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman.
  8. ÇEpni, S. B. (2016). A Replication Study: Oral Corrective Feedback on L2 Writing; Two Approaches Compared. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.072
  9. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
  10. Chen, W. (2018). The Effects of Corrective Feedback Strategies on English Majors ’ Writing. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n11p55
  11. Dilâra, ?., & Hakk, ?. (2017). Contribution of Corrective Feedback to English Language Learners ’ Writing Skills Development through Workfolio Based Tasks. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(1), 1–30.
  12. Fauziati, E. (2014). Method of Teaching English as a Foreign Language. surakarta: Pustaka Utama.
  13. Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  14. Ferris, Dana, & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
  15. Fithriani, R. (2017). Indonesian Students ’ Perceptions of Written Feedback in Second Language Writing.
  16. Ghufron, M. A. (2019). Exploring an Automated Feedback Program ‘ Grammarly ’ and Teacher Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing Assessment : Modern vs . Traditional Assessment. ELLIC. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285308
  17. Hamidnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Amirian, Z. (2020). Feeding Written Corrective Feedback Forward : English Language Learners ’ Writing Improvement in a Portfolio-Keeping Atmosphere. Teaching English Language, 14(1), 31–70.
  18. Han, Y. (2019). Written corrective feedback from an ecological perspective : The interaction between the context and individual learners. System, 80, 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.009
  19. Hapsari, N. E. (2018). Corrective Feedback In Students’ English Composition.
  20. Inayah, R. (2019). the Implementation of Collaborative Technique in Teaching Writing To Enhance Students’ Skill in Writing English Text. Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Bahasa, 12(2), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.33557/binabahasa.v12i2.741
  21. Khanlarzadeh, M., & Taheri, P. (2017). Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing : Does SEMI- Feedback Suffice ? European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 2017, 6(2), 329–342.
  22. Klimova, B. (2015). Diary Writing as a Tool for Students’ Self-reflection and Teacher’s Feedback in the Course of Academic Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.189
  23. Luan, N. L., & Ishak, S. N. A. (2018). Instructor’s direct and indirect feedback: How do they impact learners’ written performance? 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(3), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-08
  24. Mali, G. Y. C. (2015). Motivational Factors in the Indonesian Efl Writing Classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v15i1.794
  25. Mulati, D. F., Nurkamto, J., & Drajati, N. A. (2020). the Teachers’ Beliefs in Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on the Students’ Writing. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature), 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i1.7644
  26. Nagode, G. P., Pižorn, K., & Juriševi?, M. (2014). The Role of Written Corrective Feedback in Developing Writing in L2. English Language and LIiterature Teaching. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.11.2.89-98
  27. Rahmawati, E. D. (2017). Students ’ Oral and Written Feedbacks on Students ’ Writing Quality At One of Pre – Intermediate Writing Class.
  28. Royani, S., & Sadiah, S. (2019). an Analysis of Grammatical Errors in Students’ Writing Descriptive Text. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(6), 764. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i6.p764-770
  29. Seiffedin, A. H., & El-Sakka, S. M. F. (2017). The Impact of Direct-indirect Corrective E-feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 166. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.02
  30. Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). The Impact of Teacher Corrective Feedback on EFL Student Writers ’ Grammatical Improvement. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p43
  31. Shae, S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback : ( Mis ) alignment of teachers ’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45(November 2018), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
  32. Sitorus, G. S., & Sipayung, K. (2018). An Error Analysis of Using Phrases in Writing Recount Text at Tenth Grade in SMA Parulian 2 Medan. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 18(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v18i1.562
  33. Sugiyono. (2013). metode penelitian kuantitatif and kualitatif. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
  34. Wicaksono, W. P. (2018). Types and Frequencies of Written Corrective Feedbacks in Adult ESL Classroom. Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies.
  35. Wijayatiningsih, T. D. (2018). Direct Corrective Feedback on Studentswriting Performace. 4th ELTLT Conference Poceedings, 1–18.
  36. Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing : A case study of Chinese lower-pro fi ciency students. Assessing Writing, 37(March), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001