Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to find out the difficulties faced by the English teachers in Vocational High Schools in designing a lesson plan (RPP) based on KTSP. It employed a descriptive quantitative method. The population of this research was 23 respondents, from all teachers which have followed KTSP training. The sample was taken by using total sampling techniques. To collect the data, the researcher used the questionnaire. It was consist of 37 questions that it was divided into 9 aspects in a lesson plan namely; standard of competence, basic competence, indicator, the aims of learning, teaching material, the methods/techniques, the steps of learning activity, the tools/sources of material, and evaluation. It used the percentage formula and weighted mean formula to analyze data. The result of the research showed that there were not any significant difficulties in designing a lesson plan (RPP) based on KTSP faced by the English teachers in Vocational High Schools because all aspects were in sometimes/moderate predicate. It indicated that in designing a lesson plan (RPP) based on KTSP was not significant difficult. Beside that, according to the result above, the most difficult aspects were none aspect because it also with sometimes predicate. It indicated that the English teachers in Vocational High School did not find any significant difficulties in writing all aspects of the lesson plan. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Darma, S. D., SUWARNO, B., & Mulyadi, M. (2018). ENGLISH TEACHERS’ DIFFICULTIES IN DESIGNING A LESSON PLAN (RPP) BASED ON KTSP (A STUDY ON ENGLISH TEACHERS AT VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOLS IN BENGKULU CITY. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 2(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v2i1.5871

References

  1. Arikunto, S. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Company.
  2. Balitbang. (2000). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta.
  3. Balitbang. (2006). Penyusunan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP). Jakarta.
  4. Brumfit and Johnson. (1979). The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. BNSP. (2006). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta.
  6. Connell, H. (2004). Reformasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kalimah.
  7. Depdikbud. (1997). Pengelolaan Kurikulum (Seri Petunjuk Pengelolaan SLTP). Jakarta: Irma Pratama Company.
  8. Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (SMP/MA). Jakarta.
  9. Depdiknas. (2006). Panduan Pengembangan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP). Jakarta.
  10. Depdiknas. (2005). Pedoman Khusus Pengembangan Sistem Penilaian. Jakarta.
  11. Diknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (SMPN 15 Kota Bengkulu, TA 2006/2007. Bengkulu.
  12. Dimyati and Mudjiono. (2002). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineke Cipta Company.
  13. Gay. (1990). Educational Research (Competencies for Analysis and Application). Newyork: Macmillan Company.
  14. Goodwyn, A. (1992). English Teaching and Media Education. Bachingham Philadelphia. Open University Press.
  15. Graves, K. (1996). Teachers as Course Developers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Herliyanti. (2000). Studies About English Teachers’ Difficulties in Designing the Lesson Plan Based on the 1994 Curriculum. Universitas Bengkulu. Unpublished Thesis.
  17. Japar, Jasman. (2007). PanduanUntuk Membuat RPP Untuk Semua Mata Diklat. http://SMK-Putra. Com// 11.21 pm.
  18. McGin, N and Welsh, T. (2004). Desentralisasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kalimah.
  19. Meier, D. (2000). The Accelerated Learning. Newyork: Mc Graw Hill.
  20. Mulyadi and Hilda. (2004). Materi Pokok Pengajaran Terbatas (Mikro Teaching). FKIP.UNIB.
  21. Mulyasa, E and Wijaya, D. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (Sebuah Panduan Praktis). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Company.
  22. Muslich, M. (2006). KTSP (Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual). Jakarta.
  23. Nr, Rambat. (2007). Materi Seminar Peringatan Hardiknas 2007 DPD Barisan Nasional Demokrat Provinsi Bengkulu. Bengkulu.
  24. Nunan, D. (1988). The Learner-Centred Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Sudjana. (1999). Tuntunan Penyusunan Karya Ilmiah. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo Company.
  26. Ur, Penny. (1999). A Course In Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Yosipa, R. (2005). English teachers’ difficulties in Designing the Teaching Scenario Based on the 2004 Curriculum (Competence Based Curriculum) At the Public Senior High Schools in Bengkulu Town. Universitas Bengkulu. Unpublished Thesis.