Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1043 Download : 573

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is aimed at finding out to what extent IBL strategy can affect students speaking ability and to find out the significant of IBL strategy on students speaking ability. The populations of this study were all students in second grade at SMAN 7 Bengkulu. The samples of this study were 30 students on one class of second grade at SMAN 7 Bengkulu Selatan. This study used quasi-experimental study with one group design in order to test hypotheses. The study was conducted by pretest, the treatment in three meetings by using IBL strategy and posttest to the students. The instruments of this study were pretest and posttest. The result of this research showed that there were increasing scores of students speaking ability from 40,27 to 51,33, the increasing scores covered in; vocabulary aspect (13,54), grammar aspect (10,67), fluency aspect (7,33), and pronunciation aspect (12,67). The conclusions of the study were: firstly, IBL strategy affected students speaking ability with average increasing score of 11,05 covering the four aspects (vocabulary, gramar, fluency and pronunciation) of speaking. Secondly, IBL strategy affected sufficiently significant ( 0,05) on students speaking ability. This current study contributes to give the teachers an additional strategy on the effective strategy for teaching of speaking.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Irawan, Y., Syahrial, S., & Sofyan, D. (2019). THE EFFECT OF USING INQUIRY BASED LEARNING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY ( A Case Study at SMAN 7 Bengkulu Selatan). JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 3(2), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v3i2.6848
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdelraheem, A., & Aan, A. (2006). The effectiveness of inquiry-based technology enhanced collaborative learning environment. Intenational journal of technology in teaching and learning, 2(2), 65-87.
  2. Adam, Cheryll., Pierce, Rebbecca. (2006). Differentiating instruction. Prufrock Press Inc.
  3. Andrews, Kenneth. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy, 2nd Edition. Dow-
  4. Jones Irwin.
  5. Arends, Richard I. (2004). Learning to teach: Sixth Edition.Glencoe/Mcgraw Hill
  6. Post Secondary: Amazon US.
  7. Ary, Donald., Lucy, C.J, Chris, S. (2010). Introduction to research in education:
  8. eighth edition. Wadsworth Cangage Learning; USA.
  9. Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York:
  10. Longman.
  11. Brown, H.D. (2000). Teaching by principles an interactive approach language pedagogy 2nd edition. new york: pearson longman.
  12. Capacity Building Series. (2013) Inquiry-based learning. Ontario
  13. SchoolsSecretariat special edition. Retrieved from www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/. On October 01 2017.
  14. Cox, D. E., & Connors, J. J. (2017). Learning styles and cognitive performance of secondary school pupils. Retrieved on 22, 15-23.
  15. Creedy, D., Horsfall, J., Hand, B.(1992). Problem-based learning in nurse education: an Australian view. Journal of Advance Nursing, 17, 727-733.
  16. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed
  17. methods approaches. Sage publications.
  18. Dewi, K.R.A., Padmadewi, N.N., & Wedhanti, N.K. (2013). The implementation
  19. of inquiry-based learning in teaching english in Aura Sukma Insani Kindergarten. universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Retrieved on October 11 2017 from
  20. http://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPBI/article/view/5361.
  21. Escalante, Patricia.2013. Inquiry-based learning in english as a foreign language
  22. class. Revista De Lenguas Modernas: Costa Rica.
  23. Feletti, G. (1993). Inquiry based and problem based learning: how similar are
  24. these approaches to nursing and medical education?. Higher education research & Development, 12(2), 143-156.
  25. Fielding, W.J. (2012). Developing primary students’ argumentation skills in
  26. inquiry-based mathematic classroom. Mathematic Education Research group Australasia: Australia.
  27. Hebrank, Mary. (2000). “ Why inquiry-based teaching and learning in the middle
  28. school science classroom?”. Retrieved from http://www.biology.duke.edu/cibl/inquiry/why_is_inquiry.htm>
  29. Heijden, M.V.D . (2013). The perception of the use of inquiry based methods in
  30. the Chinese language classroom in IBO Primary Years program schools in the Asia Pacific region. United World College: Singapore.
  31. Herrel, Adrienne L and Michael L. Jordan. (2012). Fifty strategies for teaching
  32. english language learners, 4th edition. Pearson: US
  33. Horvart, I. (2016). Experimental research design. Springer International
  34. Publishing Switzerland: Switzerland.
  35. Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers: second edition. Cambridge
  36. University Press: UK.
  37. Intel Teach Website. (2013). Inquiry-based learning (linea). Retrieved on October
  38. 2017 from
  40. (http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/education/k12/teach-elements.html)
  41. Johnson C., Scholes G., and Whittington M. (2006). Creativity in science and
  42. technology, values and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 105- 122.
  43. Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English pronunciation. Longman: London.
  44. Key, James P. (1997). Research design in occupational education. Oklahoma
  45. State University: US.
  46. Kindsvatter, R., Willia, W., & Margaret, I. (1998). Dynamics of effective teaching.
  47. White Plains. NY: Longman.
  48. Kuhlthau, Carol C., Leslie K. Maniotes., Ann K. Caspari. (2007). Guided inquiry (learning in the 21th century). Greenwood Publishing Group Copyright.
  49. Leech, Geoffrey and Jan Svartvik. (2003). English grammar for today a new introduction second edition. Amazon: Routledge.
  50. Lee, H.Y. (2014). Inquiry-based teaching in second and foreign language
  51. pedagogy. Journal of language Teaching and Research, vol. 5, No. 6 pp.1236-1244, November 2014 ACADEMY PUBLISHER: Finland.
  52. Lestari, Endang. (2016). The implementation of inquiry-based learning in
  53. teaching english at smp negeri 1 gemolong in 2015/2016
  54. academic year. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Retrieved from http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/JOLLIET/article/view/2126 on October 11 2017.
  55. Luoma, S. (2004). “Assessing speaking”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  56. Mendur, J., Mogea, T., & Olli, S. Tresnawati. (2014). Increasing students’ ability of writing descriptive texts based on inquiry-based learning at sma kristen tondano. English study rogram Universitas Negeri Manado.
  57. Retrieved from
  58. http://ejournal.unima.ac.id/index.php/komp/article/view/2816 on
  59. October 12 2017.
  60. Milatasari, Y.U. (2013). Improving students’ ability in writing through inquiry
  61. based learning. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Retrieved from
  62. http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/bhs_inggris/article/view/7878
  63. on
  64. October 12
  66. National Capital Language Resources Center.(2015). Teaching world languages:
  67. a practical guide. The George Washington University: Washington DC.
  68. Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. esl & applied linguistics Professional Series. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  69. Nunan, D. (2003). “The impact of english as a global language on educational policies and practices in the asia-pacific region TESOL Oarterly”, 37
  70. (4), 589-613.
  72. Richards, J. C. (2008). “Teaching listening and speaking from theory to practice”. Retrieved from http//iteslg.org/Articles/Kayi-Teaching, september 22 2017.
  73. Ritchhart, Ron., Mark Church & Karrin Morrison. (2011). Making thinking
  74. visible: how to promote engagement, understanding, and
  75. independence for all learners. Jossey-Bass: US.
  76. Ross, R.J., and Morrison, A.R. (1995). American phisiological society. Retrieved from onlinelibrary.wiley.com on September 12 2017.
  77. Sakdiah, H., Pali, M., Ardhana, I.W., & Hitipeuw. (2015). The effectiveness of
  78. web- based learning inquiry method to increase students’
  79. independency of learning. Universitas Negeri Malang.
  80. Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/id/index.php/j on October 12
  84. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In CBS (special edition #32). Retrieved from http//cbs/2017 on September 27 2017
  85. Sherbiny, M. El. (2007). An expert system for multiobjective decision making.`Retrieved from cu.edu.eg on August 12 2017.
  86. Sholeh. (2008). Using inquiry-based learning strategy to improve descriptive writing ability of the second year students of MTs. Al Ikhwan Klitih Demak”. Malang University: Malang.
  87. Siegle, D. (2017). Experimental research on education. Neag School of Education. University of Connecticut.
  88. Singh, Yogesh kumar.2006. Fundamental of research methodology and statistics.New Delhi: New age international publishers.
  89. Sulastri, Sri. (2012). “Improving the students’ reading skill by using inquiry-based teaching and learning method” (Classroom Action Research at the Eight Grade of SMPN 2 Barat-Magetan in 2011/2012 Academic Year). English Education Department Graduate School, Sebelas Maret University.
  90. Talis-Pisa Link. (2016). Teaching strategies for instructional quality. OECD retrieved from @oecd.org. on oct 2 2017.
  91. Tarone, E. (2005). Speaking in a second language. in E.Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 485-502).Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
  92. Thomson, C.B., & Panacek, E.A. (2006). Research study designs: experimental and quasi-experimental. Air Medical Journal, 25(6), 242-246.
  93. Thornbury, Scoot. (2005). How to teach speaking. Pearson: United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.co.uk on September 12 2017
  94. Turkmen, H. (2009). An effect of technology -based inquiry approach on the learning “Earth, Sun & Moon” subject. HKIEd APFLST. 10(1).
  95. Wells, Alison. (2010). An investigation of inquiry-based learning in the inclusive classroom. Published thesis: University of Manitoba.