Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to describe the assertive, directive, expressive, commissive, and declarative illocutionary speech acts on the December 2018 Mata Najwa talk show program. The research method used is descriptive qualitative method. Data collection techniques using documentation techniques obtained from the Mata Najwa video program December 2018 edition taken using a handphone. Data analysis techniques are done by reducing data, presenting data, interpreting data, and conclusions. Test the validity of the data by validating pragmatic experts and member checks. The type of illocutionary speech acts in the Mata Najwa talk show program mostly use expressive speech acts that contain congratulations, thanks, praise, and criticism. Assertive speech acts aim to say, report, and mention. The directive speech acts contain speech of asking, asking, demanding, suggesting, and opposing. Commissive speech acts contain speech promising, swearing, and threatening. Then, declarative speech acts contain speech deciding, canceling, prohibiting, permitting, and forgiving. From the results of this study, it shows that in making talk show programs it is better to use variations in illocutionary speech acts and the most dominant percentage of their use should use expressive speech acts so that events are more interesting.

Keywords

speech act Mata Najwa talk show program

Article Details

Author Biographies

Dian Eka Chandra Wardhana, Universitas Bengkulu

Dosen Program Magister Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, FKIP Universitas Bengkulu

Rokhmat Basuki, Universitas Bengkulu

Dosen Program Magister Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, FKIP Universitas Bengkulu

References

  1. Apriastuti, N. N. A. A. (2017). Bentuk, Fungsi, dan Jenis Tindak Tutur dalam Komunikasi Siswa di Kelas IX Unggulan SMP PGRI 3 Denpasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 1(1). 40.
  2. Ardianto, A. (2013). Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru dalam Wacana Interaksi Kelas Anak Tunarungu. Litera, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v12i01.1318
  3. Chaer, A. (2010). Kesanunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  4. Commings, L. (2007). Pragmatik Sebuah Perspektif Multisiplener. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Handayani, T. K. (2016). Nilai-Nilai Karakter dalam Tindak Tutur Ilokusi dalam Buku Wir Besuchen Eine Moschee. Litera, 15(2), https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v15i2.11831
  6. Insani, E. N., & Sabardila, A. (2016). Tindak Tutur Perlokusi Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Sawit Boyolali. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 17(2), 176. doi:10.23917/humaniora.v17i2.2509
  7. Kentary, A., Ngalim, A., & Prayitno, H. J. (2015). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Guru Berlatar Belakang Budaya Jawa: Perspektif Gender. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v16i1.1522
  8. Kusmiarti, R., Yuniati, I., & Noermanzah. (2020). Improving Student Communication Skills In Learning Indonesian Language Through Collaborative Learning. Retrieved from osf.io/9km3u. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1).
  9. Lismayanti, H., & Aswadi, D. (2018). Tindak Tutur Lokusi Pedagang dan Pembeli di Pasar Sudi Mampir Banjarmasin. STILISTIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(1). 101, doi:10.33654/sti.v3i1.510
  10. Mirfat, M. (2019). Prinsip Kesantunan dalam Fungsi Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Film Ein Freund Von Mir dan Kokowääh. Belajar Bahasa, 4(1), 89. doi:10.32528/bb.v4i1.1870
  11. Murti, S., Nisai Muslihah, N., & Permata Sari, I. (2018). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif dalam Film Kehormatan di Balik Kerudung Sutradara Tya Subiakto Satrio. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, dan Asing, 1(1), 17–18. doi:10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i1.7
  12. Noermanzah, N. (2019). Bahasa sebagai Alat Komunikasi, Citra Pikiran, dan Kepribadian. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bulan Bahasa (Semiba) 2019, https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/semiba/article/view/11151
  13. Novianti, H. (2017). Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Iklan Perdagangan di Radio Harau FM Payakumbuh Periode Pebruari-April 2016. Bahastra, 37(2), 129. doi:10.26555/bahastra.v37i2.7493
  14. Saptani, P. (2015). Tindak Tutur dalam Wacana Kelas Vb SD Negeri 62 Kota Bengkulu Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 1–2. doi:10.33369/diksa.v1i2.3145
  15. Sudaryat, Y. (2011). Makna dalam Wacana. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
  16. Syafryadin, Dian, E. C. Wardhana., Eka Apriani., & Noermanzah. (2020). Maxim Variation, Conventional, and Particularized Implicature on Students’ Conversation. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2) https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/cza8y.
  17. Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta.
  18. Wijana, I. D. P. dan Rohmadi, M. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Surakarta:Yuma Pustaka.