Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates how semantic mapping strategy can improve students’ reading comprehension. The subject of this research was the ten grade students consisted of 32 students. In this classroom action research, the researcher used quantitative data to see the improvement of the students’ reading comprehension, and qualitative data to explain the change in students’ behaviour during the implementation of the strategy. Based on the result of the test conducted at the end of the cycle and the analysis of the observation checklist and field notes, it could be concluded that both the students’ reading comprehension and the students’ attitude during the reading class have been improved. The students who passed the test improved from 43.75% at the baseline data to 87.5% at the end of cycle II. This improvement mostly influenced by the second and the third phase of semantic mapping strategy, which are brainstorming categorization. In this phases, the students activate their prior know and learn to visualize relationship between ideas and put them into categories. Thus, the students have a better comprehension of the text. The students also showed better motivation, interest, participation, and enthusiasm toward the learning process proven by the results of the observation. However, the materials in this present research were short reading texts. The implementation of the strategy on longer reading texts should be taken into a deeper study in the future research.

Article Details

How to Cite
Puspa, A., & ., S. (2018). IMPROVING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH SEMANTIC MAPPING STRATEGY FOR INDONESIAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 1(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v1i1.3937

References

  1. Abdollahzadeh, E., and Amiri, N. (2009). The Journal of Applied Linguistics Vol. 2, Issue 1, Spring 2009: The Effect of Semantic Mapping as a Vocabulary Instruction Technique on EFL Learners with Different Perceptual Learning Styles. Retrieved on January 25, 2012, from http://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/1009720090401.pdf
  2. Ajideh, P. (2003). The Reading Matrix Vol.3. No.1, April 2003: Schema Theory-Based Pre-reading Tasks: A Neglected Essential In The ESL Reading Class. Retrieved on February 6, 2012, from http://www. reading matrix .com /articles/ ajideh/ article.pdf
  3. Ajideh, P. (2006). Volume 16 Teachers Articles November 2006 Article 2: Schema–theory Based Considerations on Pre-reading Activities in ESP Textbooks. Retrieved on January 25, 2012, from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/pta_november_06_pa.php
  4. Aprillianto, R. (2009). Using Semantic Mapping Technique to Improve Reading Ability of IX - Grade of MTs Maarif Sukorejo - Pasuruan. Abstract retrieved on March 7, 2011, from http:// karya - ilmiah. um. ac.id / index.php / disertasi /issue/view/109
  5. Baleghizadeh, S., and Naeim, M. Y. (2011). The International Journal - Language Society and Culture: Enhancing Vocabulary Retention through Semantic Mapping: A Single-Subject Study. Retrieved on February 6, 2012, from http:// www. educ. utas. edu.au/ users / tle / JOURNAL/ issues/2011/32-02.pdf
  6. Burton, et al. (1991). How to Prepare Better Multiple-Choice Test Items: Guidelines for University Faculty. Retrieved on May 25, 2012, from http://testing.byu.edu/info/handbooks/betteritems.pdf
  7. Estes, T. (1999). EDIS 771: Reading in Contents Area. Strategies for Reading to Learn Semantic Maps. Retrieved on January 24, 2012, from http://www.readingquest.org/edis771/semantic_maps.html
  8. Ferrance, E. (2000). Action Research. Brown University: Laboratory At Brown University.
  9. Hilmes, D. (2007). How to Improve Reading Comprehension. [PDF document]. Retrieved on March 7, 2011, from Virtual Learning Environment Solution, Inc: www.abcteach.com/directory/reading_comprehension.pdf
  10. Lihua, Yu. (2005). CELEA Journal Bimonthly. Vol. 28, No. 2, April 2005; Application of Semantic-Mapping Approach and Prediction-Confirmation Theory in the Pre-Reading Process to Promote Reading Comprehension. Retrieved on February 6, 2012, from http://www.elt-china.org / teic / 60 / 60-63.pdf.
  11. Mahdum. (2009). Penggunaan Semantic Mapping dalam dalam meningkatkan kemampuan membaca mahasiswa S1 semester dua program studi bahasa Inggris FKIP UR Pekanbaru. Abstract retrieved on April 28, 2011
  12. Muhtar, Kamal. (2010). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension through Semantic Mapping Strategy (An Action Research in the Eighth Year Students of SMPN 1 Sine in the Academic Year of 2009/2010). Abstract retrieved on January 23, 2012, from http://pasca.uns.ac.id/?p=1065
  13. Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia)
  14. Saputri, Barkah. (2011). Factors Affecting the Reading Comprehension. Retrieved on February 13, 2012, from http://socyberty.com/ education /factors - affecting - the – reading - comprehension/
  15. Tateum, S. (2007). A Case Study of The Implementation of Semantic Mapping As A Pre-teaching Vocabulary Activity to 2nd Year English Major Students at Lampang Rajabhat University. [PDF document]. Retrieved on January 25, 2012 from http://litu.tu.ac.th/th2011/files/Suphaphon_4821032325.pdf
  16. Zaid, M. A. (1995). Journal, Vol 33 No 3, July - September 1995 Page 6. Semantic Mapping in Communicative Language Teaching. Retieved on February 12, 2012 from http://eca.state.gov/forum/vols/vol33/no3/p6.htm
  17. Zainil. (2008). Actional Functional Model (AFM): Classroom Action Research. Sukabina Offset