Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was conducted to improve IX A grade students’ ability in listening to recount genre. In doing this research the researcher applied analyzing song technique. There were 32 students involved in this research. The data of this research was taking in two ways; test and observation. In taking the observation data the researcher was helped by two English teachers to know how far that the teaching process worked. The test was used to know the students progress from cycle to cycle. The test result showed that in the cycle one there are 41.25 % students still had problem with the grammar, 38.78% students still had problem with the spelling and 31.87% students had problem in area of hearing, while the average score of the student’s achievement is 61.00. In the cycle two the students made improvement significantly. There were only 25.00% students still had problem with the grammar, 23.00% students had problem with spelling and 27.19% students had problem with hearing, and  the average score of the students’ achievement was 75.00. from the result it can be concluded that song analysis technique can improve the IXA  Grade students ability in listening to a recount genre

Article Details

How to Cite
., Z. (2018). IMPROVING STUDENTS‘ ABILITY IN LISTENING TO A RECOUNT GENRE THROUGH SONG ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 1(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v1i1.3941

References

  1. Assinder W. Peer teaching peer learning Eenglish teaching forum.
  2. Anugrahwati, Nunung ( 2004 ); teaching English through song analysis: Paper presented on training of trainer of English teacher in six provinces.
  3. Bock, C. (1996). Unfied process spesification language: Requirment for modelling process. NSTIR 5910: National Institute and technology.
  4. Cutler, A .& Norris, D (1988). The role of strong syllable in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of experiment psychology: Human preception and performance. (13.3) pp 1-4
  5. Depdiknas, (1996). Garis – garis besar program pengajaran( GBPP ) SLTP, Jakarta : Dirjen Dikdasmen.
  6. Depdiknas.(2004). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi .Standard kompetensi mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP dan MTs.
  7. Depdiknas,(2004).KurikulumBerbasisKompetensi. Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP dsam MTs.
  8. Djoehana,D.(2002). Inquiry dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris. Paper presented on training of trainer of English teacher in six provinces.
  9. Fay, D & Cutler. A. (1977). Malaporism and the structure of the mental lexicon. Ling. 8.3.505-20.
  10. Field, John. (2004) Psycholinguistic: the key concepts: New York Routledge.
  11. Hobsar, David (1996). Classroom action research and Its application.London: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  12. Haesley Brendan. (2003). English for communication for SLTP students. Jakarat Penerbit. Erlangga.
  13. Kasihani. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning (CTL) Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa. Paper presented on training of trainer of English teacher in six provinces.
  14. Littlewood, W, (1986). Foreign English as a second language: Language acquisition research and Its application for the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Mukarto.(2002). English on sky 1. for junior high school . Jakarta Penerbit, Erlangga.
  16. Norton, D.E. (1980). The effective teaching of language arts. London: E. Merril Publishing Company.
  17. Paulston, C.B and M.N Brudder.(1981). Teaching English as a second language, Technique and Procedure. Boston : Little, Brown and Company.
  18. Richard, J.C and T.S Rodgers.(1980). approach and method of english teaching. A descriptive and analysis. New York :CambridgeUniversity Press.
  19. Sudjana. (1993). Dasar – dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta Penerbit, Bumi Aksara.