Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 918 Download : 13462

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Implicature was refers to implied meaning in utterance that can be understood by indirectly expression. In informal conversation was occurred the hidden meaning of what actually said by the speakers.  This study was investigated the types of implicature in informal conversations used by the English education study program students.  The study was aimed to analyze the types of implicature and how the implicature is carried out in the informal conversations.  The method of study was a descriptive qualitative method.  The subjects of this study were 25 students of English study program who have informal conversation. The students’ conversation was transcribed and analyzed by using checklist instrument. The results was shown that 1) there were three types of implicature found in the informal conversations; conventional implicature, generalized conversational implicature and particularized conversational implicature, and 2) the implicature is carried out in the informal conversations by the used of generalized conversational implicature and particularized conversational implicature. Moreover, a conclusion is students in the informal conversation have potentially implicature that indicates that their utterance has implied meaning. The suggestions, the study about implicature should be conducted in different area such as movie, drama or others, to give enrichment information in the Pragmatics study.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Rahayu, E. S. R. S., & ., S. (2018). TYPES OF IMPLICATURE IN INFORMAL CONVERSATIONS USED BY THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM STUDENTS. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 1(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v1i1.3942
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Black, Elizabeth. 2006. Pragmatics Stylistics: Edinburgh Textbooks in Applied Linguistics. Great Britain: Edinburgh University Press. Retrieved on July 12 2009. From http://faculty. ksu.edu.sa/ 76518 / Linguistics / books/ pragmatic %20%20stylistics.pdf
  2. Bottyan, Gergely. The operationality of Grice’s tests for Implicature. Retrieved on December 12 2011. From http://www.nytud.hu / cescl / proceedings /Gergely_Bottyan_CESCL.pdf
  3. Brown, Gilian and George Yule.1998. Discourse Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Grice, H. Paul.1975. Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics (vol.3), ed. P. Cole and J.L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Studies in the Way of Words, ed. H.P. Grice, pp 22-40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1989).
  5. Hornby, AS.2000. Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press.
  6. Johnson, Lee. 2003. What Is an Utterance. Retrieved on November 31 2011. From http://www. wisegeek. com / what – is – an -utterance.html
  7. Levinson, Stephen C.1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Liddicoat, A J. 2007. An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Athenaeum Press.
  9. Moeschler, Jacques. Conversational and conventional Implicatures. Swiss: University of Geneva, retrieved on January 12 2012. from http://www.unige.ch/lettres/linguistique/moeschler/publication_pdf/implicatu e-moeschler-def.pdf
  10. Parker, Frank.2005. Linguistics For Non Linguistics. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
  11. Rosidi, Imron. 2009. Bentuk Implikatur Dalam Kegiatan Transaksi Di Koperasi Siswa SMKN Kota Pasuruan. .retrieved on February, 12 2012. From: http://www.scribd.com/doc/51371192/ TUTURAN – SISWA – DALAM –SOSIOLINGUISTIK – BU - ID.
  12. Sbisà, Marina.2003. The Rationality of Conversational Implicature. Italy: University of Trieste.
  13. Sidnell. Jack. 2009. Conversation Analysis, Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Victory, Widya RP.2010. Implicature Used in Humors of Yes Man Movie. Unpublished thesis. Semarang: UMS. Retrieved 12 October 2011. from: http://lib.uin-malang.ac.id/ thesis / full chapter/06320107 - widya - rabiah - praja -victory.pdf.
  15. Widyawati, Anis. 2010. Implicature Used In the Main Characters on the Movie Transcript of Memories of Geisha. Research paper. Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Malik Ibrahim. Retrieved 12 October 2011. From http://lib.uin-malang.ac.id /thesis / fullchapter/06320060-anis-widyawati.ps
  16. Wooffitt, Robin.2005.Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A comparative and Critical Introduction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  17. Yule, George.1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.