Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 3, 2025
Published
October 15, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Writing scientific articles is a major concern for novice writers, and studying rhetorical moves is an appropriate approach to address this issue. This study aims to analyze rhetorical moves in 30 highly cited international journal articles in the field of linguistics and to examine the pattern arrangements in the Introduction, Methods, and Results-Discussion-Conclusion (RDC) sections. Using a qualitative content analysis combined with frequency analysis across various frameworks, the study is grounded in Swales’ (1990) theory, which conceptualizes rhetorical moves as functional components in academic writing. The findings reveal that the most frequently occurring rhetorical moves consist of eight: three in the Introduction, two in the Methods, and three in the RDC section. Each move comprises specific steps: the Introduction includes three steps, the Methods section also includes three steps, and the RDC section consists of eight detailed steps. The pattern arrangements identified are [M1 M2 M3] and [M1 M3] in the Introduction, [M1 M2 M1 M2] in the Methods, and [M3 M4 M3 M4 M5] in the RDC section. These findings highlight the importance of move-pattern awareness in academic writing and offer practical guidance for novice writers seeking to emulate effective rhetorical structures in scholarly discourse

Keywords

Highly Cited International Journals Linguistics Articles Rhetorical Moves

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Malihah Harfiani, Eri Kurniawan, Ruswan Dallyono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Harfiani, M., Kurniawan, E., & Dallyono, R. (2025). The rhetorical structure of highly cited articles in linguistics . JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 10(2), 652–682. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v10i2.42267
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahlstrom, D. (2017). How to publish in academic journals: Writing a strong and organized introduction section. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research. 4(2), 1–9.
  2. Ahmadi, L. (2022). Rhetorical Structure of Applied Linguistics Research Article Discussions: A Comparative Cross-Cultural Analysis. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle. 2022.12750
  3. Alamri, B. (2020). A comparative study of saudi and international journals of applied linguistics: The Move-bundle connection approach. Journal of Language and Education, 6(2), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.17323/JLE. 2020.10531
  4. Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/ 47.749366
  5. Asari, S., & Kurnia, F. D. (2018). Ideas Pattern Manifested in Rhetorical Moves of English Language Teaching and Learning Research Articles Discussion Written by Indonesian English Academics. 1(1), 83–92.
  6. Bazerman, C. (1984). Modern Evolution of the Experimental Report in Physics: Spectroscopic Articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980. Social Studies of Science, 14(2), 163–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 030631284014002001
  7. Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2013). How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons. EMBO Reports, 14(3), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2013.9
  8. Briones, R. R. Y. (2012). Move analysis of philosophy research article introductions. Philippine ESL Journal, 9(1), 56–75.
  9. Canet, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030023
  10. Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating Rigour and Credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
  11. Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121–150.
  12. Friginal, E., & Mustafa, S. S. (2017). A comparison of U.S.-based and Iraqi English research article abstracts using corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 45–57.
  13. Geng, H., Lee, G. I., Jalaluddin, I., & Tan, H. (2023). Rhetorical Moves of Introduction Sections in English Linguistics Research Articles From Two Non-Scopus and Two Scopus Journals. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(8), 2087–2096. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.25
  14. Gladon, R., Graves, W., & Kelly, M. (2011). Getting published in the life sciences (N. W.-B. Hoboken (ed.)).
  15. Grant, A. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: Setting the hook. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 873–879.
  16. Gwet, K. L. (2021). Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters: Vol 2: Analysis of Quantitative Ratings (Vol. 1).
  17. Hashemi, M. R., & Gohari Moghaddam, I. (2019). A Mixed Methods Genre Analysis of the Discussion Section of MMR Articles in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816674626
  18. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. In Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. The University of Michigan Press.
  19. Jurnal, D., Lee, G. I., & Tan, H. (2023). Gerakan Retoris Bagian Pendahuluan dalam Artikel Penelitian Linguistik Inggris Dari Dua. 13(8), 2087–2096.
  20. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
  21. Kurniawan, E., Lubis, A. H., Suherdi, D., & Danuwijaya, A. A. (2019). Rhetorical organization of applied linguistics abstracts: Does scopus journal quartile matter? GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(4), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1904-10
  22. Lewin, F. & Y. (2001). Expository Discours: A Genre Based Approve to Social Scince Research.
  23. Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002
  24. Martín-Martín, P. (2002). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in Experimental Social Sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43.
  25. Maswana, S., Kanamaru, T., & Tajino, A. (2015). Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, 2.
  26. Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006
  27. Nasirizadeh, Z., Paramasivam, S., Nimehchisalem, V., & Omar, N. (2022). Rhetorical structures and cyclical patterns in forestry research articles. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(2), 288–311. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2202-15
  28. Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5
  29. Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5
  30. Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389-411. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088308317815.
  31. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  33. Tardy C.M. (2019). We are all reviewer #2: A window into the secret world of peer review. In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds), Novice writers and scholarly public.
  34. Wannaruk, A., & Amnuai, W. (2016). A Comparison of Rhetorical Move Structure of Applied Linguistics Research Articles Published in International and National Thai Journals. RELC Journal, 47(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215609230
  35. Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385.