Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 6, 2018
Accepted
November 6, 2018
Published
December 10, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 283 Download : 714

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the quality of English for the First Year of Senior High School Implementing the 2013 Curriculum the academic years 2016/2017. The method applied in this research was descriptive method. Data collection techniques used observation check list. There were three textbooks observed. The aspects that were observed consisted of content, presentation, language, and graphic. The result indicated as follows. For the appropriateness the content of view; there were only two textbooks which belong to ‘good’ category books, namely Pathway to English for Senior High School Grade X, published by Erlangga and Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X, published by Kemdikbud. An others textbook had ‘fair’ category namely Bahasa Inggris untuk SMA-MA/SMK kelas X, published by Yrama Widya. There was one textbook which was categorized into ‘very good’ presentation, namely Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X, published by kemdikbud. while two other textbooks, namely Pathway to English for Senior High School Grade X and Bahasa inggris untuk SMA-MA/SMK kelas X had ‘good’ category. Concerning the language aspect, there was one textbook, nemely Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X had ‘very good’ category. Two other textbooks, namely Pathway to English for Senior High School Grade X and Bahasa inggris untuk SMA-MA/SMK kelas X had ‘good’ category. Concerning the graphic aspect, there were two textbooks which belonged to ‘very good’ category, namely Pathway for Senior High School Grade X and Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X. An others textbook namely, Bahasa Inggris SMA- MA/ SMK kelas X had ‘good’ category. Thus, three textbooks had good category and be worthy to use because they fulfilled the quality of good textbook.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Syafrina, E., & Arono, A. (2017). FEATURES OF ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR THE FIRST-YEAR OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL IMPLEMENTING THE 2013-CURRICULUM. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v2i2.5950
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agus, A. (2016). An analysis on English textbook pathway to English for the first year student of senior high school based on 2013 curriculum. UMS: Published Thesis
  2. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  3. Ayaturrochim. (2014). “The analysis of reading tasks in “English in focus” textbook based on cognitive domain of revised bloom’s taxonomy.” Thesis, English Language Education Study Program, Education and Teachers Training Faculty, Bengkulu University
  4. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, (2014). Standar isi untuk acuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: BSNP
  5. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, (2016). Standar isi untuk acuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: BSNP
  6. Chandran, S. “Where are the ELT Textbook?”. in Willy A. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology and Materials Design in Language Teaching:Current Perception and Practices and their Implications. Singapore : SEAMEO Regional language centre. 2003.
  7. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your course book. New York: Macmillan.
  8. Farisi, M. I. (2012). Buku teks sebagai psychological tool prosess enkulturasi dan pelestarian kearifan lokal. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah Nasional Guru IV. Tangerang: Universitas Terbuka.
  9. Hutchinson, T. & Torres, E. (2004). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48 (4), 315-328.
  10. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.(2016) Revisi bahasa Inggris/ kementrian pendidikan dan kebudayaan. – Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan indonesia.
  11. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. (2012). http://www.kemendikbud.edu
  12. Kinasih, A. K. (2014). A content analysis on English textbooks for the tenth graders: Look Ahead an English course for senior high school students’ year X and Pathway to English for senior high school student grade X. UNJ: Published Thesis
  13. Mchugh, M. (2012). Interrater reliability: the Kappa Statistic biochemia medira. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM2012.031
  14. Muslich, M. (2010).Text book writing: Dasar- dasar pemahaman, penulisan dan pemakaian buku teks.Yogyakarta: Ar- Ruzz Media
  15. Muzakir. (2012). Penulisan buku teks yang berkualitas(Artikel Jurnal Online). http://www.google.com/file.upi.
  16. Nation, I. S. P. & Macalister. J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York & London: Routledge.
  17. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2016. Buku teks pelajaran. Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta
  18. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2016.Kompetensi inti dan kompetensi dasar lampiran 47. Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
  19. Prasojo, A. (2014). The analysis of English textbook “Pathway to English” used in the first grade of senior high school based on curriculum 2013. UIN: Published Thesis.
  20. Ramadhan, F. A. (2016). A content analysis based on contextual learning materials in curriculum 2013 textbook ‘talk active’. UIN: published thesis.
  21. Richard, Jack, (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. USA Cambridge university press
  22. Setiawan, D. O. (2013) Bahasa Inggris / oleh Otong Setiawan Dj..- Cet.1. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
  23. Subariyah. (2014). An analysis on the suitability of the English textbook pathway to English for the tenth grade students of senior high school based on Tomlinson’s theory. UMS: published Thesis
  24. Sudarwati, TH. M. & Grace, E. (2013). Pathway to English for Senior High School and MA Grade X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  25. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Cetakan kedua belas, Bandung : Alfabeta.
  26. Sukmadinata,N.S.(2010). Pengembangan Kurikulum Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: PT remaja rosdakarya offset.
  27. Tarigan, H. G. (2009). Dasar- dasar kurikulum bahasa. Bandung:Penerbit Angkasa
  28. Tarigan, H.G. & Tarigan, D. (2009). Telaah Buku teks bahasa Indonesia. Bandung : Penerbit Angkasa
  29. Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum development. New york: Macmillan.
  30. Tomlinson, B. (2003). Materials Evaluation. In Tomlinson, B. (ed). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London and New York: Continuum.
  31. Ur, Penny. (2009). A course in language teaching practice and theory. New York: Cambridge University Press
  32. W.,Ganjar Harimansyah, dkk. (2008). Pengembangan model pembelajaran: uji efektivitas bahan ajar BIPA. Jakarta:Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.