Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 6, 2018
Accepted
November 6, 2018
Published
December 10, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 87 Download : 87

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was aimed to find out  the students’, lecturers’, and experts’ perspective toward the quality of the English coursebook for nursing department students. This research was an evaluative study. The participants of this research were 3 experts, 3 lecturers and 80 nursing students. The instrument of this research was an evaluation checklist based on  Mc.Donough and Shaw’s criteria.  The findings of the research were (1) over eighty percent participants agreed that syllabus fulfills the criteria for quality a nursing coursebook; (2) over eighty percent participants agreed that the content area fulfills the criteria for quality a nursing coursebook; (3) over ninety percent participants agreed that layout and physical appearance fulfills the criteria for quality a nursing coursebook; (4) over eighty percent participants agreed that practicality  fulfills the criteria for quality a nursing coursebook; (5) over eighty percent participants agreed that language use  fulfills the criteria for quality a nursing coursebook.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Rahma, Q., Safnil, S., & Arono, A. (2017). The Quality of English Coursebook for Nursing Department Student (Based on Students’, Lecturers’, And Experts’ Perspective). JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 2(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v2i2.5961
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al-Ghazalo, Abeer and Oqlah M. Smadi, (2013). A content Analysis of the English Reading Text’s Autenticity In Student’s Book Of Action Pack Eleven In Jordan. European Scientific Journal, vol.9
  2. Arifin, samsul. 2007. Sukses Menulis Buku Ajar & Referensi. Jakarta: PT Grasindo
  3. Arikonto, Suharsimi. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  4. Brown, H.D (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4 ed.). New York: Addison Weasley Longman Incorporation.
  5. Christoper Shaw and Jo.Mc.Donough and Shaw’s (2015) Materials and Methods in ELT Teacher’s Guide, American.
  6. Creshwell, Jhon W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. (2nd ed). California Sage Publication Inc.
  7. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Ellis, R. (1997). “The Empirical Evaluation of Language Teaching material.” ELT Journal, Vol.5 number 1, pp.36-42.
  9. Feez,S & Joyce H (2002) Text- Based Syllabus Design, NWS: AWES
  10. Fitri Celia (2015) A textbook Evaluation and Students’ perception on English textbook entitled “ when English rings a bell” used by students of SMPN 2 Bengkulu City.
  11. Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A.(1993), English for Specific purposes: A learning centered approach. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Hutchinson, T. and Torres, E. (1994). The Textbook as Agent of Change. ELT Journal, Vol.7 pp 48
  13. Jones Sarah (2009) A retrospective Evaluation a ELT Coursebook for a Korean University conversation course.
  14. Jakovos Tsiplakides (2011) The researcher selecting an English coursebook, Show Theory and Practice English teacher in secondary education.
  15. Gholamreza Zareian (2015) An Evaluation of Question in Two ESP Coursebook Based on Bloom’s New. Domain International Journal of Education and Research Vol.3 No. 8 August.
  16. Lori, siebert and Ballard. (1992). Making a Good Layout, USA: North Light Books.
  17. Mahmood, Khalid. M. Zafar and M. Saeed. (2009). “Textbook Evaluation through quality indicators: the case of Pakistan, Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, vol.5, no 2, pp 170-190.
  18. Mc. Donough, J., Shaw’s (2013). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s guide (3rd ed). United Kingdom: Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  19. Richard Jack (2001) Curriculum development in language teaching, USA Cambridge university press.
  20. Rossi Petter and Mark Freeman (2000) Evaluation a Systematic Approach. American.
  21. Riazi, A. M. (2003). What Do Textbook Evaluation Schemes Tell Us? A Study of the Textbook Evaluation Schemes of Three Decades. Shiraz University.
  22. Richard Jack (2001) Curriculum development in language teaching, USA Cambridge university press.