Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 24, 2018
Accepted
November 24, 2018
Published
November 24, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 143 Download : 85

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research objective are analyze the common pattern in Jakarta Post and ‘Kompas’ newspaper editorials. The research method used was a mixed method. The research instrument is checklist. The procedure classifies all objects (10 texts Jakarta Post newspaper editorials and 10 texts ‘Kompas’ newspaper editorials) on the thematic progression patterns are checklist. The result showsthat the thematic progression in Jakarta Post and ‘Kompas’ newspaper editorials are found 3 patterns of thematic progression; 10 texts derived theme; 8 texts Constant progression, and 2 text linear progression. The different on thematic progression in Jakarta post and “Kompas’ newspaper editorials is  difference,the difference of sequence in the patterns between Jakarta Post and ‘Kompas’ newspaper editorials. The Conclussion Thematic Progression in Jakarta Postand ‘Kompas’ newspaper editorials are derived theme and Constant progression.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Triyana, N., Arsyad, S., & Arono, A. (2018). THEMATIC PROGRESSION IN JAKARTA POST AND ‘KOMPAS’ NEWSPAPER EDITORIALS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TEXT COHERENCE STRATEGY. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 3(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v3i1.6167
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arikunto,Suharsimi.1998.Prosedur penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
  2. Alice Caffarel-Cyron&elizabethRechniewski. 2014. Exploring the generic structure of french editorials from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics, Journal of world language.
  3. Brown, H Douglash. 1994. Teaching by principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy.San Fransisco: Prentice Hall Regent.
  4. Danes, F. 1974. Fungsional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text.In papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, by F. Danes, The Hague. Mouton
  5. Eggins, S. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics.London: Continuum.
  6. Escholz, Paul and alfred, Rose. Subject and Strategy, a Rhetoric Reader. New York: St. Martin’s Press (1985)
  7. Eva’s 2013.Thematic Development of Letters on Reader’s Forum in the Jakarta Post Published in February 2013.
  8. Forey, G. 2002.Aspects of theme and their role in workplace texts.Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
  9. Fries, P.H. 1995.Themes, methods of development and Texts. In On subject and theme: From the perspective of functions in discourse, ed. R. Hasan, and P. Fries, 317–359. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  10. Glass, G.V., &Hoplins, K.D. 1984. Statistical methods in education and psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  11. Ghadessy, M. 1995. Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres.In Thematic development in English text, ed. M. Ghadessy, 129–146.London: Pinter.
  12. Halliday, M.A.K. 2014.An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen.New York: Routledge.
  13. Halliday, M.A.K. 2004.An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen.London: Arnold.
  14. Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Indtroduction to Functional Grammar.2nd Ed. London: Arnold.
  15. Halliday, M.A.K., and R. Hasan.1985. Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  16. Halliday, M.A.K and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman
  17. Halliday, M.A.K. 1978.Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Lnaguage and Meaning.London: Edward Arnold.
  18. Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Indtroduction to Functional Grammar.2nd Ed. London: Arnold.
  19. Herriman, J. 2011. Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. Nordic Journal of English Studies 10: 1–28.
  20. H.J.X. Fernandes, 1984. Testing and Measurement.Jakarta Nasional Education Planning.
  21. Hopkins, D.1993. A teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research. 2nd edition.
  22. Jing Wie.2016 Theme and Thematic Progression in Chinese College Students’s English Essay. Media Singapore
  23. Kanoksilapatham, B. 2005. Rhetorical Structure of Biochemistry Researcher Article. English for Specific Purposes, v24 n3, 169-292
  24. Martin, J. 1992. English text.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  25. Martin, J.R. 1995. More than what the message is about: English Theme. In Thematic development in English, ed. M. Ghadessy, 223–259.London/New York: Printer.
  26. McCabe, A. 1999.Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history text (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Aston: Aston University.
  27. Mauranen, A. 1993a.Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: a textlinguistic study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  28. Mauranen, A. 1993b.Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 12: 3–22.
  29. Thompson, G. 2004. Introducing functional grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.
  30. Thompson, G. 2014. Introducing functional grammar, 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
  31. Wang, L. 2007. Theme and rheme in the thematic organization of text: Implications for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal 9(1): 164–176.
  32. Weir, C.J. 1983.Identifying the language needs of overseas students in tertiary education in the United Kingdom.Upublished.Ph D Thesis, University of London.
  33. Yang, X. 2008.Thematic progression analysis in teaching exploration writing. English Language Teaching 1(1): 29–33. 46 3 Theoretical Background.
  34. Van Dijk, T.A. 1996. Opinion and ideologies in Editorials’, Second Draft March 1996. Paper for 4th International Symposium of critical Discourse Analysis, Language, Social life and Critical Thought, Athens 1995, and 2006.
  35. Valeria’s. 2015. A genre analysis of news Item Texts in the Jakarta Post and New York Times.