Main Article Content


The purpose of the study was  to investigate the EFL teachers’ perceptions concerning the textbook of “Think Globally Act Locally” on these criteria: (1) physical and utilitarian attributes, (2) efficient outlay of objectives and supplementary material, (3) learning- teaching content, (4) language skills and aspects. Thirty two EFL teachers of junior high school participated in this study. The instrument consisted of questionnaire and interview. Results indicated that in physical and utilitarian attributes, this textbook was perceived as ‘Good’, in efficient outlay and supplementary materials was perceived as   ‘Fair’,   in learning-teaching content was perceived as ‘Fair’,  and in language skills and aspects was perceived  as  ‘Fair’.  Overall,  this  textbook  was  perceived  as ‘Fair’.  It  still  needs improvement in several aspects. The illustrations should be more natural. The mistakes in this textbook should be corrected. Teaching aids like audio materials (cassette/CD), posters, and flashcards, need to accompany this textbook. The exercises should be varied. New word list and glossary should  be provided to support vocabulary building and reading   skill.   Finally,   authentic   audio   material   like   cassette/CD   and   phonetic transcriptions for each new word should be available for listening and pronunciation practice.

Article Details

How to Cite


  1. AbdelWahab, M.M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) e-ISSN: 2320–7388, p-ISSN: 2320–737X Volume 1, Issue 3 (Mar. –Apr. 2013), PP 55-
  2. Retrieved from
  3. Ahour, T., Towhidiyan B., & Saeidi M., (2014). The evaluation of “English textbook 2” in Iranian high schools from teachers’ perspectives. English language teaching; Vol. 7, No. 3; 2014. ISSN 1916-4742 E- ISSN 1916-4750. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. Retrieved from x.php/elt/article/viewFile/34248/19
  4. Alamri, A. A. M. (2008). An evaluation of the sixth grade english language textbook for Saudi’s boys’ schools. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ministry of Higher Education. King Saud University. Deanship of Higher Studies. Department of English Language. Retrieved from ments/MA%20thesis.pdf
  5. Ansary and Babaii. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: a step towards systematic textbook evaluation. Retrieved on February 26, 2018 from
  6. Textbooks/.
  7. Anshar, M.R., Emilia E., & Damayanti, I.L. (2014). The evaluation of
  8. English electronic books for junior high school in Indonesia. In Edusentris. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Vol.1 No.3
  9. Desember 2014. University of Education. Bandung. Retrieved from
  10. Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta, Indonesia: Rineka Cipta.
  11. Baleghizadeh & Ashoori, A. (2010). The effect of keyword and word list methods on immediate vocabulary retention of EFL learners. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 35 (2):
  12. -261
  13. Cakit, I.. (2006) Evaluation of the EFL
  14. textbook “New Bridge to Success
  15. ” from the perspectives of students and teachers. Thesis. School of
  16. Social Sciences of The Middle East
  17. Technical University.
  18. Celce-Murcia, (2001).Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd Edition). Retrieved from
  19. .http://www.tesl-
  20. /ej20r4/.
  21. Chambliss, M., & Calfee, R. (1998).
  22. Textbooks for learning: Nurturing
  23. children’s minds. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
  24. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. London, England: Macmillan: Heinemann.
  25. detikNews. (2014). Mendikbud: Ada
  26. sekolah yang akan menjadi percontohan kurikulum 2013.
  27. Retrieved from
  29. /mendikbud-ada-6221-sekolah-
  30. yang-akan-menjadi-percontohan- kurikulum-2013
  31. Dougill, J. (1987). Not so obvious. In L.E. Sheldon (ed). ELT Textbook and Materials: Problems in evaluation and development, (pp.
  32. -35). Oxford, England: Modern
  33. English Publication.
  34. Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: an SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, vol.
  35. , no. 1, pp. 83-107. Retrieved from
  37. ile/view/ellis_grammar-1.pdf.
  38. Ferris D.R. & Hedgecock, J.S. (2005).
  39. Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
  40. Fitriyani, M. (2013). A textbook analysis of when english rings the bell, a textbook for seventh grade of Junior High School. Faculty of Languages and Arts of the State University of Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
  41. Grant, C. (1992). Best practices in teacher preparation for urban schools. Paper prepared for the
  42. AERA Symposium, San
  43. Francisco, USA.
  44. Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
  45. Heriati, R. (2017). The analysis of think globally act locally’s book and its relevance to 2013 English curriculum. Undergraduate thesis, IAIN Palangka Raya, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://digilib.iain-
  46. Khodareza & Komachali, E. (2012). The effect of using vocabulary flashcard on Iranian on Iranian pre-university students’ vocabulary knowledge. Canadian Center of Science and Education Journal, 5 (3): 134-147.
  47. Kitao, K., Kitao, S.K. (1997). Selecting and developing teaching/learning materials. The Internet TESl journal, IV (4), April 1997. Retrieved from Materials.html
  48. Littlejohn A. and Windeatt. (1989).
  49. Beyond language learning: Perspective on materials design. In RK Johnson (ed) The second language curriculum. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Mahmood, K. (2011). Conformity to quality characteristics of textbooks: the illusion of textbook evaluation in Pakistan. Journal of Study and Reflections in Education, Vol.5, No.2, pp 170 -190. Retrieved from pdf.
  51. Masuhara, H.(1998). What do teachers really want from textbook? In Tomlison, B. Materials Development for Language Teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Ming-jun. (2008). Principal approaches of grammar instruction. Retrieved from on/238570266_Principal_approach es_of_grammar_instruction.
  53. Mohammed & Jaber. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive approaches of teaching on
  54. Jordanian University students' use of the active and passive voice in English. Retrieved from
  55. Suyanto, K.E. (2010). English for young learners. Jakarta, Indonesia: Sinar Grafika Offset.
  56. Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow, England: Longman, Pearson Education Limited.
  57. Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers? perspectives. Educational Study and Review Vol. 5 (9), pp. 508-517, September 2010. ISSN 1990-3839
  58. © 2010 Academic Journals. Retrieved from urnal/ERR/article-full- textpdf/3CAEBA44186
  59. Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching : Practice and theory. Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press.
  60. Wachidah, et al. (2015). Think Globally Act Locally Grade IX. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta, Indonesia.
  61. Wijayanti. (2016). Lived experience in using the 2013 curriculum-based textbook: Think Globally Act Locally. Universitas Sanata Dharma. Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
  62. (2017). Tahun 2018 seluruh sekolah diharapkan terapkan kurikulum 2013. Retrieved from tahun-2018-seluruh-sekolah- diharapkan-terapkan-kurikulum-