Main Article Content


The objectives of this study were: (1) To find out whether textbook used by second grade students at SD IT UMMI Kota Bengkulu fulfill the criteria of a good textbook. (2) To find out whether the English textbook used by second grade students at SD IT UMMI Kota Bengkulu relevant to KTSP curriculum. This research used descriptive qualitative content analysis as its research method. The data were collected from the English student book “Let’s Make Friends with English” for second grade students. The results showed that English textbook entitled “Let’s make friends with English” used by second grade students at SD IT UMMI Kota Bengkulu have fulfilled the criteria of a good textbook by achieving the Fair fulfillment. The textbook was categorized relevance to the KTSP curriculum, but the activities in the listening can be said irrelevant because they cannot cover the learning objectives in listening. It was then recommended that the teachers need to modify the tasks and activities on the textbook which did not fulfill the criteria of good textbook, especially in the area of accompanying materials (CD, Cassettes and pictures), language skill, and teach ability aspects.

Article Details

How to Cite


  1. Arikunto, Suharsimi (2000). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  2. Bednarek, Monika (2008). Emotion Talk across Corpora. Palgrave.
  3. Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4thed). New York : Addison Wesley Longman.
  4. Bybee, J. and S. Fleishman (1995), Modality in Grammar and Discourse (Typologial Studies in Language)", Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  5. Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks : Evaluation for Selection and Analysis for Implementation. In Celce-Murcia, M. Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed). US : Heinle & Heinle.
  6. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebooks. Oxford : Maxmillian Heienman ELT. 173
  7. Fairclough N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse and Text: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
  8. Ferris, Dana R and Hedgcock, John S (2005). Teaching ESL Composition “purpose, process and practice. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
  9. Garinger, D. Textbook Evaluation. Retrieved July 14, 2007, from
  10. Gay and Airasian (2000). Educational Reasearch “Competencies for Analysis and Applications. United States of Amerika: Pearson Education, Inc.
  11. Graves, K. (2000). Designing Language Courses. Canada: Newbury House.
  12. Hedges, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Second Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.) (2000). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Hyland, K.(2002). Teaching and researching writing. London : Pearson Education.
  15. Littlejohn, A. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials : inside the Trojan horse. In Tomlinson, B. (Ed). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  16. Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (3rded). West Sussex : Willey-Blackwell.
  17. McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  18. Mukundan, J., Nimehchisalem, V, & Hajimohammadi, R. (2011). Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist : A focus group discussion. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (12), 100-106.
  19. Nation, I.S.P & Macalister, Jhon. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.
  20. Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. Singapore: McGraw Hill
  21. Park, E. (2004). A Study on English Textbook Used in a Technical High School: Issues in EFL. (online), Vol.3 ( accessed on August, 2017)
  22. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. California: Sage Publications.
  23. Piaget, J. (1980). Six Psychological Studies. New York: Vintage.
  24. Print, M. (1993). Curriculum Development and Design (2nd Ed). Sydney : Unwin Pty.Ltd.
  25. Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Richards, J.C., & Renandya, W.A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An Anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Richards, J.C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal 44(1) 5–33.
  28. Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T.(2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  29. Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials. English Language Teaching Journal, 42(4), 237-246.
  30. Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D .Bandung: Alfabeta.
  31. Tarigan, H. Guntur (2010). Telaah Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa.
  32. Thein, N. (2006) Evaluating the Suitability and Effectiveness of Three English Coursebooks at Myanmar Institute of Technology. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Thailand. Thailand.
  33. Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  34. Tomlinson, B., (2001) EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal 55(1): 80-101.
  35. Tomlinson, B. (2003) Materials Evaluation. In Tomlinson, B. (ed) (2003) Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London and New York: Continuum.
  36. Tomlinson, B. (2012). Principles and Procedures of Materials Development. N. Harwood (ed.), 81-108.
  37. Tu'eimah, R. A. (1985). A Guide for Preparing Arabic Language Teaching Programs. Arabic Language Institute. Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
  38. Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching : practice and theory. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  39. Ur, P. (2009). A Course in Language Teaching : practice and theory. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  40. Widdowson, H. G. (1983) . Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.