Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the general conversational implicature, scale conversation implicature, and special conversation implicature in in the Sweet 20 film by Ody C. Harahap. The research method used is qualitative research methods. Data collection techniques used are documentation techniques and refer to techniques. Data analysis techniques by transcribing the entire contents of the film, marking implicature, interpreting, and making conclusions. Test the validity of the data with member checking and expert validity. From the results of the study, the dominant implicature used in the Sweet 20 film by Ody C. Harahap is a specific conversation implicator as much as 75%, followed by a general conversation implicator as much as 21.33%, and finally the scale implication as much as 3.79%. The specific implications of the conversation in the form of using the language of speakers tend to use special words that only the speaker can understand the meaning or purpose of the speech. The Sweet 20 film is personal and familial in delivering speeches by speakers. From the results of this study, what needs to be considered is that when writing films Indonesian language teachers should pay attention to the composition of the use of implicature types.

Keywords

Conversational Implicature Film

Article Details

Author Biographies

Deby Prana Sari, STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau

Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau

M. Syahrun Effendi, STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau

Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau

References

  1. Astuti, W. D. (2017). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Gelar Wicara “Sentilan Sentilun” di Metro TV. Kandai, 13(2), 311. doi:10.26499/jk.v13i2.306
  2. Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  3. Dewojati, C. (2010). Drama Sejarah, Teori, dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  4. Effendi, D., & Hetilaniar, H. (2019). Pandangan Dunia Pengarang dalam Novel Bulan Terbelah di Langit Amerika Karya Hanum Salsabiela Rais dan Rangga Almahendra serta Implikasinya dalam Pengajaran Sastra. Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 63. doi:10.33369/diksa.v5i2.9707
  5. Gulo, M. I. & Ritonga, M. U. (2017). Implikatur Percakapan di Lapas Wanita Kelas II A Medan. Medan (3). Kode: Jurnal Bahasa, 6(4). https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/kjb/article/view/10838
  6. Harahap, Ody C. (2017). Sweet 20 (DVD Original). CJ Entertainment.
  7. Ihsan, D. (2011). Pragmatik, Analisis Wacana, dan Guru Bahasa. Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya.
  8. Irma, C. N. (2019). Analisis Fungsi dan Bentuk Implikatur dalam Iklan Sprite: Kenyataan yang Menyegarkan di Televisi. Jurnal Hasta Wiyata, 2(2), https://hastawiyata.ub.ac.id/index.php/hastawiyata/article/view/34
  9. Kurniati, A. (2019). Implikatur dan Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerjasama dalam Wacana Percakapan Debat Calon Gubernur DKI Jakarta (Penelitian Analisis Isi dalam Acara Gelar Mata Najwa di Metro TV). Deiksis : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(1), 91. doi:10.33603/deiksis.v6i1.1215
  10. Lubis, H. H. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa Bandung.
  11. Murti, S., Nisai Muslihah, N., & Permata Sari, I. (2018). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif dalam Film Kehormatan di Balik Kerudung Sutradara Tya Subiakto Satrio. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 1(1), 17–32. doi:10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i1.7
  12. Nadar, FX. (2009). Pragmatik & Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  13. Noermanzah, N. (2012). Figurative Language dalam Wacana Drama Seri “Upin dan Ipin” Karya Simon Monjack dengan Tinjauan Deskriptif. Jurnal Perspektif Pendidikan, 5(1), 11-23, https://ojs.stkippgri-lubuklinggau.ac.id/index.php/JPP/article/view/347
  14. Noermanzah, N. (2017). Plot in a Collection of Short Stories “Sakinah Bersamamu” Works of Asma Nadia with Feminimism Analysis. Humanus, 16(1), 27. doi:10.24036/jh.v16i1.7015
  15. Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Jogjakarta: Diva Press.
  16. Pratista, H. (2008). Memahami Film. Yogyakarta: Homerian Pustaka.
  17. Redaksi PM. (2012). Sastra Indonesia Paling Lengkap. Jawa Barat: Pustaka Makmur.
  18. Rohman, S. & Emzir. (2015). Teori dan Pengajaran Sastra. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  19. Saputra, Mujiyono, Akhyarudin. (2015). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Stand Up Comedy Indonesia di Stasiun Kompas TV Edisi April 2014. Pena, 5(1), https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pena/article/view/4349
  20. Syafryadin, Dian, E. C. Wardhana., Eka Apriani., & Noermanzah. (2020). Maxim Variation, Conventional, and Particularized Implicature on Students’ Conversation. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2) https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/cza8y.
  21. Trianton, T. (2013). Film sebagai Media Belajar. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  22. Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pusaka Pelajar.
  23. Yulianti, A. A. (2018). Prinsip Kerja Sama dan Implikatur pada Tuturan Alih Kode dalam Film-Film Jerman. Belajar Bahasa, 3(2). doi:10.32528/bb.v3i2.1582