Article Sidebar

Volume 8, Nomor 1, 2022
Submitted
March 12, 2022
Accepted
March 12, 2022
Published
June 2, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 115 Download : 15

Main Article Content

Abstract

The research methodology section in a journal article is one of the most important things in determining the accuracy of the results of the research conducted by the author. However, in reality it is different from the scientific study that is written, the stages will be different in the journal article in which the article is published. The purpose of this study is to find the rhetorical style of the research methodology section in accredited social and humanitarian national journals by not discussing the linguistic aspects in it. This study used descriptive qualitative method. The data collection techniques are grouping knowledge based on sinta accreditation, analyzing the data, determining proportional journal articles, and determining journal articles. Data analysis techniques, namely journal articles that have been determined to be tabulated in the methodology section, transcribe the contents of the research methodology section, tabulate based on linguistic stages and aspects, interpret, and draw conclusions. Validity is done by checking with a team of three experts. This study describes the rhetorical style of the research methodology section of an accredited national journal in the social and humanitarian field by not discussing the linguistic aspects in it. The results of the study indicate that working in the social and humanities fields accredited journal articles in the research methodology section in the social and humanities field are. move the research method which contains a research component method, the research subject section has a research object section, the research procedure section contains component procedures, and the analysis section contains a data analysis component. The linguistic features contained in the methodology section in this study, namely, are, and, namely, with, in, as well as, for, because, and so. This linguistic feature shows that the methodology section of this study presents explanatory and argumentative sentences using complex sentences, both equivalent compound sentences and mixed compound sentences.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 arono arono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biographies

Suryadi Suryadi, Universitas Bengkulu

Dosen Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Bengkulu

Arono Arono, Universitas Bengkulu

Dosen Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Bengkulu

References

  1. Arsyad, S. (2013a). A genre-based analysis of Indonesian research articles in the social sciences and humanities written by Indonesian speakers. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 8(3), 234-254.
  2. Arsyad, S. (2013b). A genre-based analysis on the introductions of research articles written by Indonesian academics. TEFLIN Journal. 24(2), 180-199.
  3. Arsyad, S. (2013c). A genre-based analysis on discussion section of research articles in Indonesia written by Indonesian speakers. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 50-70.
  4. Azevedo, L.F.et al. (2011). How to write a scientific paper-writing in the methods section. Penoumologia Portuguese journal of pulmonology. 17(5), 232-238.
  5. Besnard and Hunter. (2008). Elements of argumentation. London: The MIT Press.
  6. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research 4th ed. New York: Pearson.
  7. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE Publication, Inc.
  8. Gay, R.L. (2009). Educational research. London. Merril publishing company
  9. Loan, N.T. and Pramoolsook, I. (2015). A move analysis of method chapters by Vietnamese TESOL master’s students. An International Refereed e-Journal of Literary Explorations, 3(1), 14-28.
  10. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24: 269-292.
  11. Lim, J.M.H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3): 282-309.
  12. Kafes, H. (2016). Generic structure of the method sections of research articles and MA Theses by Turkish academic writers. International Journal of Langauge Academy, 4(3): 132-145.
  13. Peacock, M. (2011). The structure of the methods section in research articles across eight disciplines. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 97-123.
  14. Toulmin, S. (2003). The use of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25, 389-411.
  16. Swales, J, M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and aesearch settings. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  17. Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5(3), 65-72.