Article Sidebar

Volume 8, Nomor 1, 2022
Submitted
March 14, 2022
Accepted
March 14, 2022
Published
June 6, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 469 Download : 1113

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article describes the comparison of news-writing learning during offline learning and online learning with the aim of getting a portrait of news-writing learning in both types of learning. Research conducted is descriptive quantitative. The research sample was Junior High School teachers in all regions of Indonesia who were randomly selected. The questionnaire is an instrument in this study
which is distributed via google form. The research steps were as follows: (1) determining the topic; (2) exploring theoretical studies; (3) formulating instruments; (4) validating the instrument; (5) disseminating instruments; (6) collecting and calculating the results of the questionnaire that has been obtained; (7) discussing and concluding the research results. The results of research on both types of learning show several similarities and differences. The findings that contain the similarities between offline and online learning are: (1) more than 50% of the teachers did not use certain learning models for news writing materials; (2) that audiovisual media is the most widely used (50-51.8%); (3) news text is the final product of learning more than 50%; and (4) performance assessment used 50-56.1%. The resulting differences are: (1) offline learning does not use applications, while applications that are widely used online are the WA Group (48.6%); (2) the most prominent learning methods and techniques used when offline were discussion (48.2%), while online was direct observation (35.7%).

Keywords

learning methods comparison offline learning online learning newswriting reading literacy

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Utami Dewi Pramesti, Andoyo Sastromiharjo, Dadang S.Anshori, Yeti Mulyati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Agustini, P. (2021). Kominfo Catat 1.733 Hoaks Covid-19 dan Vaksin. Kementerian
  2. Komunikasi Dan Informatika RI. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2021/05/kominfocatat-
  3. -733-hoaks-covid-19-dan-vaksin/
  4. Bahri, A. S. (2021). Memproteksi Peserta Didik dari Bahaya Hoaks Dengan Literasi
  5. Kritis. Lentera : Jurnal Kajian Bidang Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(2), 1–6.
  6. Barus, M. D. D. B. ., Annisa, & Ermina Waruwu. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan
  7. Menulis Teks Berita Dengan Menggunakan Model Cooperative Script Pada
  8. Siswa Kelas VIII-2 SMP Negeri 2 Kabanjahe Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal
  9. Sasindo FBS UNIMED, 8(1).
  10. Briit, A.M., Rouet, J. S., & Durik, A. (2018). Literacy Beyond Text Comprehension (A
  11. theory of Purposefull Reading. Routledge.
  12. Dervent. (2015). The effect of reflective thinking on the teaching practices of
  13. preservice physical education teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3),
  14. –275.
  15. Fatemipour. (2013). The Efficiency of the Tools Used for Reflective Teaching in ESL
  16. Contexts. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1398–1403.
  17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.051
  18. Garner, B., & Oke, L. (2015). Blended Learning: Theoretical Foundations. Wesleyan
  19. University.
  20. Halijah, Khaerah, A., & Ulfa, A. Y. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring Zoom,
  21. Google Classroom, Whatsapp Selama Pandemik di Universitas Muhammadiyah
  22. Bulukumba. Jurnal Sainsmat, 9(2), 152–164.
  23. Herman. (2017). Medsos Jadi Penyebar Hoax Terbanyak. Beritasatu.Com.
  24. https://www.beritasatu.com/archive/414155/medsos-jadi-penyebar-hoaxterbanyak
  25. Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor
  26. Tahun 2013 tentang: Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah., Pub.
  27. L. No. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia (2013).
  28. Juwito. (2008). Menulis berita dan features. Unnesa University Press.
  29. Lisanti, F., Yulistio, D., & Basuki, R. (2021). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Mata
  30. Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Teks Surat Pribadi dan Surat Dinas di Kelas
  31. VII SMP Negeri Lubuk Tua Kabupaten Musi Rawas. Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa
  32. Dan Sastra Indonesia, Vol. 7(1), 42–58.
  33. Marlina, H., Sadieli, & Ramadhan Saleh. (2019). Peningkatan keterampilan menulis
  34. berita melalui penggunaan media video pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Imajeri, 2(1),
  35. –108.
  36. Nugroho, A., Bakti, C. A., & Yuliana, Paulus Damar Bayu Belaon, M. M. (2021).
  37. Edukasi Bahaya Berita Hoax di Masa Pandemi pada Wali Siswa PAUD RUSA.
  38. Jurnal Magistrorum Et Scholariumurnal Magistrorum, 2(1), 65–76.
  39. Okvireslian, S. (2021). Pemanfaatan aplikasi whatsapp sebagai media pembelajaran
  40. dalam jaringan kepada peserta didik paket b uptd spnf skb kota cimahi. Jurnal
  41. Comm-Edu, 4(3), 131–138.
  42. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). PISA 2009
  43. Assessment Framework Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics And
  44. Science. The Secretary-General of the OECD.
  45. Prajana, A. (2017). Pemanfaatan aplikasi whatsapp dalam media pembelajaran di uin
  46. ar-raniry banda aceh. Cyberspace: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2),
  47. –133.
  48. Prawanti, L. T., & Woro Sumarni. (2020). SEMINAR NASIONAL PASCASARJANA
  49. UNNES. Kendala Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemic Covid-19.
  50. Rayani, D., & Purqoti, D. N. S. (2020). Kecemasan Keluarga Lansia Terhadap Berita
  51. Hoax Dimasa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 5(906–
  52. .
  53. Suhaebah, N. (2014). Kemampuan menulis teks berita pada peserta didik kelas VIII
  54. MTs di Basseang. Jurnal Pepatuzdu, 7(1), 21–38.
  55. Taylor & Mackenney. (2008). Improving human learning in the classroom: theories
  56. and teaching practices by Rowman and littlefield education. Addison Wesley
  57. Longman.
  58. Tim GLN. (2017). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Nasional 2017. Kementerian Pendidikan
  59. dan Kebudayaan.
  60. Utami, L. D. (2021). Tingkat Literasi Indonesia di Dunia Rendah, Ranking 62 Dari 70
  61. Negara. Perpustakaan.Kemendagri.Co.Id.
  62. https://perpustakaan.kemendagri.go.id/?p=4661#:~:text=Published by admin on
  63. Maret 23%2C 2021&text=“Tingkat literasi Indonesia pada penelitian,nasional
  64. bidang perpustakaan tahun 2021.
  65. Yuliani, A. (2017, December 13). Ada 800.000 Situs Penyebar Hoax di Indonesia.
  66. Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informasi Republik Indonesia.
  67. https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/12008/ ada-800000-situs-penyebar-hoax-diindonesia/
  68. /sorotan_media