Article Sidebar

Volume 8, Nomor 1, 2022
Submitted
July 10, 2022
Published
June 20, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 282 Download : 825

Main Article Content

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in learning having turned into online distance learning. The learning is dominated by independent learning, even though the ability to socialize and work in teams is needed at this time. Collaborating is one of the skills needed in the 21st century. Students' opinions differ, because the rapid development of education or internet access does not guarantee the quality of education and student satisfaction. Based on this explanation, the purpose of this study was to determine student responses regarding group learning in online distance learning. This research is a descriptive research using survey method. The instrument used is a questionnaire sheet. The number of respondents who filled out the questionnaire was 484 students. Questionnaire data were analyzed by describing the findings obtained which were described through descriptive statistics. The results showed that students gave a positive response to implementing group learning during online distance learning, for the following reasons: the task was carried out more easily; can get help when experiencing difficulties; can discuss by expressing opinions; can share ideas with group members, etc. However, there are also some weaknesses in this learning, such as the role of group members; domination that works unevenly; talk a lot, etc.

Keywords

Group Learning Online Distance Learning Student Response

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Adalar, H. (2021). Smartphone perception and experiences of teacher candidates during covid 19 process: What is my smartphone for me? Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(2), 384-395.
  2. Alansari, M., Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2021). Enablers and barriers to successful implementation of cooperative learning through professional development. Education Science, 11, 1-18.
  3. Almutairi, F. M., Ali, N. G. & Ghuloum, H. F. 2021. A novel framework for facilitating emergency remote learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Education Studies, 14(5), 121-134.
  4. Altunçekiç, A. (2022). Developing a Distance Education Self-Efficacy Belief Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 9(1), 349-361.
  5. Arra, C. (2021). Gender differences in community college psychology students’ cooperative learning experiences: A qualitative analysis. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 24(1), 1-21.
  6. Arthur-Nyarko, E., Agyei, D. D., & Armah, J. K. (2020). Digitizing distance learning materials: Measuring students' readiness and intended challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2987–3002.
  7. Astuti, P. & Lammers, J. C. (2017). Individual accountability in cooperative learning: More opportunities to produce spoken English. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 215-228.
  8. Baines, E. Blatchford, P. & Kutnick, P. (2017). Promoting effective group work in the primary classroom: a handbook for teachers and practitioners. Routledge: London, UK.
  9. Berlyana, M. D. P. & Purwaningsih, Y. (2019). Experimentation of STAD and Jigsaw learning models on learning achievements in terms of learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(4), 517-524.
  10. Berzener, U. A. & Deneme, S. (2021). The effect of cooperative learning on EFL learners’ success of reading comprehension: An experimental study implementing Slavin’s STAD method. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(4), 90-100.
  11. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-Determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1) , 56-71.
  12. Bouchey, B., Gratz, E., & Kurland, S. (2021). Remote student support during COVID-19: Perspectives of chief online officers in higher education. Online Learning, 25(1), 28-40.
  13. Branch, J., Hayes, S., Horsted A., & Nygaard, C. (2017). Innovative teaching and learning in higher education. UK: Libri
  14. Cankaya, S. & Yunkul, E. (2018). Learner views about cooperative learning in social learning networks. International Education Studish, 11(1), 52–63.
  15. Chiriac, E., & Granstrom, A. (2012). Teachers’ leadership and student experience in group work. Teachers and Teaching, 18, 345-363.
  16. Chowdhury, T. A. (2021). Fostering learner autonomy through cooperative and collaborative learning. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(1), 89–95.
  17. Çoban, M. & Göksu, I. (2022). Using virtual reality learning environments to motivate and socialize undergraduates in distance learning. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 9(2), 199-218.
  18. Çömez, C. B., Çavumirza, E. & Yildirim, E. (2022). Investigation of the effect of web 2.0 supported 5e learning model on students' success and opinion in teaching pressure unit in distance education. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 9(1), 73-97.
  19. Damopolii, I., & Rahman, S. R. (2019). The effect of STAD learning model and science comics on cognitive students achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157.
  20. De Silva, D. V. M. (202). Developing self-regulated learning skills in university students studying in the open and distance learning environment using the KWL method. Journal of Learning for Development, 7(2), 204—217.
  21. Dhawan, S. Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crises. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 49(1), 5-22
  22. Dillenbourg, P. & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. in scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer: Boston, MA, USA, pp. 275–301.
  23. Duran, M. (2021). The effects of COVID-19 pandemic on preschool education. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(2), 249-260.
  24. Each, N., & Suppasetseree, S. (2021). The effects of mobile-blended cooperative learning on EFL students’ listening comprehension in Cambodian context. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 143-170.
  25. Ergül, H. (2006). Motivation structures affecting academic achievement in online education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5 (1), 124-128.
  26. Fernández-González, C. & Franco-Mariscal, A. (2021). Teaching the plant kingdom using cooperative learning and plants elements: A case study with spanish secondary school studen. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 17-31.
  27. George, R. L. (2017). Teacher perception of cooperative learning strategies impacting English learner engagement and academic performance levels. http://commons.cuportland.edu/edudissertations/26
  28. Gudawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2003). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of reseach on educational communications and technology (2nd Edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  29. Hijriyah, E. M., Darmawan, E. & Zamzami, M. R. A. (2018). Enchancing biology students motivation through classroom action research based STAD learning model. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 9-16.
  30. Irwin, C.W., & Stafford, E.T. (2016). Survey methods for educators: Collaborative survey development (part 1 of 3). Washington, DC: U.S: Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands.
  31. Jacobs, G. M. & Ivone, F. M. (2020). Infusing cooperative learning in distance education. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 24(1), 1-15.
  32. Jainal, N. H., & Shahrill, M. (2021). Incorporating Jigsaw strategy to support students? learning through action research. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 3(2), 252-266.
  33. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2001). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95-105.
  34. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota.
  35. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondaryand professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 15-29.
  36. Jones, K. A., & Jones, J. L. (2008). Making cooperative learning work in the college classroom: An application of the “five pillars” of cooperative learning to post-secondary instruction. Journal of Effective Teaching, 8(2), 61-76.
  37. Kanthimathi, S. & Raja, B, W. D. Covid-19: A challenging enigma to global education. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 221-224.
  38. Khan, G. N. & Inamullah, H. M. (2011). Effect of student’s team achievement division (STAD) on academic achievement of students. Asian Social Science, 7(12), 211–215.
  39. Knop, K., Öncü, J. S., Penzel, J., Abele, T. S., Brunner, T., Vorderer, P., & Wessler, H. (2016). Offline time is quality time. Comparing within-group self-disclosure in mobile messaging applications and face-to-face interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1076-1084.
  40. Kristiansen, S. D. (2021). Becominga socially responsive co-learner: primary school pupils’ practices of face-to-face promotive interaction in cooperative learning groups. Education Science, 11, 1-19.
  41. Landicho, C. J. B. (2021). Changes, challenges, and opportunities in teaching senior high school earth science amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 6(1), 55-57.
  42. Li, M. P., & Lam, B. H. (2013). Cooperative learning. The Hong Kong Institute of Education, 1-33.
  43. Liu, O. L. (2012). Student evaluation of instruction: In the new paradigm of distance education. Research in Higher Education, 53(4), 471–486.
  44. Makgahlela, M., Mothiba, T. M., Mokwena, J. P. Mphekgwana, P. (2021). Measures to enhance student learning and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of students from a historically disadvantaged university. Education Science, 11, 1-15.
  45. Meng, F. (2009). Encourage learners in the large class to speak english in group work. English Language Teaching, 2(3).
  46. Muhonen, A. & Räsänen, E. (2021). “Kaikille okei?” Everyone all right? Shifting topics and practices in language students’ chats during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10 (spesial issue), 258-278.
  47. Murtiyasa, B. & Hapsari, S. N. (2020). The effect of TAI and STAD strategy towards learning putcomes reviewed from mathematical communication skill. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2406-2415.
  48. Nguyen, C., Trinh, T., Le, D., & Nguyen, K. (2021). Cooperative learning in English language classrooms: teachers’ perceptions and actions. Anatolian Journal of Education, 6(2), 89-108.
  49. Noevadila, I. & Bustami, A. (2019). Pengaruh metode STAD (Students Teams Achievement Division) terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII semester genap di SMP Negeri 1 Situbondo. Edusaintek: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Teknologi, 6(1), 75-84.
  50. Özkara, Ö. (2020). Students’ perspectives of distance education. Tojet: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-Special Issue IETC, ITEC, IWSC & INTE, 247-259.
  51. Özüdo?ru, G. (2021). Problems faced in distance education during Covid-19 Pandemic. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 8(4), 321-333.
  52. Phipps, R. A. (2015). Measuring quality in internet-based higher education. International Higher Education, 20, 2–3.
  53. Pürbudak, A. & Usta, E. (2021). Collaborative group activities in the context of learning styles on web 2.0 environments: an experimental study. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 8(2), 407-420.
  54. Rhamayanti, Y. (2019). Peningkatan hasil belajar matematika dan respon siswa melalui pembelajaran kooperatif tipe sSTAD dengan metode terbimbing. Edumatika Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 29-39.
  55. Rusmawati, P. E., Candiasa, I. M. & Kirna, I. M. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TGT therhadap prestasi belajar matematika ditinjau dari motivasi berprestasi siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Semapura tahun pembelajaran 2012/2013. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3.
  56. Salam, A., Hossain, A., & Rahman, S. (2015). Effects of using Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) cooperative technique for learning mathematics in secondary schools of Bangladesh. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(3), 35–45.
  57. Sarabol, N. (2012). Implementing cooperative learning in english language classroom; Thai university students’ perceptions. Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6, 111-122.
  58. Setyo, A. A. (2017). Keefektifan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD integrasi teori belajar Van Hiele pada materi geometri di kelas V sekolah dasar. E-Journal Qolam: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 6(1), 1-11.
  59. Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2021). Effect of cooperative learning on chemistry students’ achievement in Rwandan day-upper secondary schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 2079-2088.
  60. Situmorang, M.A. (2021). Students’ perception of using group work in english class. Journal of English teaching, 7(1), 81-88.
  61. Sugino, C. (2021). Student perceptions of a synchronous online cooperative learning course in a japanese women’s university during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Science, 11, 1-19.
  62. Suryani & Azli (2018). The use of STAD to improve students’ writing skill. Journal of ELT Research, 3(1), 38-42.
  63. Sutiah, S., Slamet, S., Shafqat, A. & Supriyono, S., (2020). Implementation of distance learning during the COVID-19 in Faculty of Education and Teacher Training. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 15(5), 1204 - 1214.
  64. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–330.
  65. Taqi, H. A., & Al-Nouh, N. A. (2014). Effect of Group Work on EFL Students’ Attitudes and Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 52-65.
  66. Temel, M. K. & Ertin, H. (2020). Lessons from the 1918 influenza pandemic for the COVID-19 pandemic. Anatolian Clinic Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(1), 63-79.
  67. Torrijo, F. J., Garzón-Roca, J., Cobos, G. & Eguibar, M.Á. (2021). Combining project based learning and cooperative learning strategies in a geotechnical engineering course. Education Science, 11, 1-16.
  68. Tran, V. D. & Lewis R. (2012) Effects of cooperative learning on students at an Giang University in Vietnam. Int. Educ. Stud., 5(1), 86–99.
  69. Ustati, R., & Hassan, S.S.S. (2013). Distance learning students’ need: Evaluating interactions from Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 292–304.
  70. Van den Berg, G. (2020). Context matters: Student experience of interaction in open distance learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Learning-TOJDE, 21(4), 223-236.
  71. Van Wyk, M. (2011). The effects of Teams-Games-Tournaments on achievement, retention, and attitudes of economics education students. Journal Social Science, 26(3), 183–193.
  72. Varela, D. G. & Fedynich, L. C. (2021). Teaching from a social distance: Teacher experiences in the age of COVID-19. Research in Higher Education Journal, 39, 1-20.
  73. Vaughan, N., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Edmonton, AB: AU Press.
  74. Yaduvanshi, S. & Singh S. (2019). Fostering achievement of low-, average-, and high-achievers students in biology through structured cooperative learning (STAD Method). Education Research International, 1-10.
  75. Yu, S.& Yuizono, T. (2021). Opening the ‘black box’ of cooperative learning in face-to-face versus computer-supported learning in the time of COVID-19. Education Science. 11, 1-18.
  76. Zhao, H., Chen, L., & Panda, S. (2013). Self-regulated learning ability of Chinese distance learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 941-958.
  77. Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127–136.