Article Sidebar
Download
Main Article Content
Abstract
Reasoning in student scientific work mostly places the conclusion at the beginning of the paragraph. This shows that based on its complexity, deductive reasoning still dominates the structure of students' writing. However, as students at the highest level, students should be able to produce various complexities of reasoning. This research aims to describe the building blocks of reasoning in students' scientific work from a gender perspective. This research uses a qualitative approach. The research data is in the form of texts in student scientific works consisting of 100 articles written by 50 male students and 50 female students in the Sharia Business Management, Sharia Accounting, Sharia Banking and Sharia Economics Study Program at the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, IAIN Holy. The data collection method in this research is the observation method. Data analysis uses the Holsti communication content analysis model. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the elements that build reasoning in the scientific work of male and female students have differences in the selection of elements that build reasoning when presenting arguments. The difference lies in providing evidence for the position conveyed. Men tend to provide evidence in the form of opinions, while women provide evidence in the form of facts.
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ulfah Mey Lida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
-
Anjani, A. V., Yuberti, Y., & Asyhari*, A. (2022). Pengaruh Prestasi Akademik dan Perbedaan Gender Terhadap Kemampuan Scientific Reasoning Mahasiswa Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(4), 862–874. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i4.26266
Budhyani, I. D. A. M., & Angendari, M. D. (2021). Kesulitan dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Mimbar Ilmu, 26(3), 400. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v26i3.40678
Dawud. (2008). Penalaran dalam karya tulis populer argumentatif. Bahasa Dan Seni, 36, 1, 41–48.
Farashaiyan, A., & Tan, K. H. (2012). On the relationship between pragmatic knowledge and language proficiency among Iranian male and female undergraduate EFL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 18(1), 33–46.
Fawaiz, S., Handayanto, S. K., & Wahyudi, H. S. (2020). Eksplorasi Keterampilan Penalaran Ilmiah Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(7), 934. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i7.13721
Heriyani. (2018). Eksistensi Perempuan Bali dalam Novel Tempurung Karya Oka Rusmini Kajian Feminisme Eksistensialis Simone De Beauvoir. In Eprints Universitas Negeri Makassar (Issue 1).
Khosa, D., & Ramakrishna, R. A. R. (2023). Graffiti and gender: A sociolinguistic study of wall writings in selected pakistani higher learning institutions. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2901-03
Lida, U. M. (2022). Struktur Isi Argumen dalam Teks Argumentasi Siswa Tahap Operasi Formal. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i2.318
Lida, U. M., & Zulaeha, I. (2017). Pola Penalaran Dalam Karangan Argumentasi Pada Siswa Tahap Operasi Formal. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 3(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v3i1.1570
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis a Sourcebook of New Methode. Sage Publications.
Mulyaningsih, I., Rahmat, W., Maknun, D., & Firdaus, W. (2022). How Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation Can Improve Students’ Scientific Writing Skills. International Journal of Language Education, 6(4), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.34360
O, H. (1969). Content Analysis for The Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison Wesly Publishing Company.
Peze, A. Ten, Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van Weijen, D. (2021). WRITING CREATIVE AND ARGUMENTATIVE TEXTS: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? Exploring how task type affects students’ writing behaviour and performance. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 21(2021), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.11
Scharlau, I., Karsten, A., & Rohlfing, K. (2021). Building, emptying out, or dreaming? Action structures and space in undergraduates’ metaphors of academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 12(3), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.12.03.01
Utami, T. R., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Urgensi Penalaran Dalam Argumentasi Hukum Guna Mengembangkan Pemikiran Hukum Yang Komprehensif. Crepido, 1(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.32-39
References
Anjani, A. V., Yuberti, Y., & Asyhari*, A. (2022). Pengaruh Prestasi Akademik dan Perbedaan Gender Terhadap Kemampuan Scientific Reasoning Mahasiswa Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(4), 862–874. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i4.26266
Budhyani, I. D. A. M., & Angendari, M. D. (2021). Kesulitan dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Mimbar Ilmu, 26(3), 400. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v26i3.40678
Dawud. (2008). Penalaran dalam karya tulis populer argumentatif. Bahasa Dan Seni, 36, 1, 41–48.
Farashaiyan, A., & Tan, K. H. (2012). On the relationship between pragmatic knowledge and language proficiency among Iranian male and female undergraduate EFL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 18(1), 33–46.
Fawaiz, S., Handayanto, S. K., & Wahyudi, H. S. (2020). Eksplorasi Keterampilan Penalaran Ilmiah Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(7), 934. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i7.13721
Heriyani. (2018). Eksistensi Perempuan Bali dalam Novel Tempurung Karya Oka Rusmini Kajian Feminisme Eksistensialis Simone De Beauvoir. In Eprints Universitas Negeri Makassar (Issue 1).
Khosa, D., & Ramakrishna, R. A. R. (2023). Graffiti and gender: A sociolinguistic study of wall writings in selected pakistani higher learning institutions. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2901-03
Lida, U. M. (2022). Struktur Isi Argumen dalam Teks Argumentasi Siswa Tahap Operasi Formal. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i2.318
Lida, U. M., & Zulaeha, I. (2017). Pola Penalaran Dalam Karangan Argumentasi Pada Siswa Tahap Operasi Formal. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 3(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v3i1.1570
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis a Sourcebook of New Methode. Sage Publications.
Mulyaningsih, I., Rahmat, W., Maknun, D., & Firdaus, W. (2022). How Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation Can Improve Students’ Scientific Writing Skills. International Journal of Language Education, 6(4), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.34360
O, H. (1969). Content Analysis for The Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison Wesly Publishing Company.
Peze, A. Ten, Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van Weijen, D. (2021). WRITING CREATIVE AND ARGUMENTATIVE TEXTS: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? Exploring how task type affects students’ writing behaviour and performance. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 21(2021), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.11
Scharlau, I., Karsten, A., & Rohlfing, K. (2021). Building, emptying out, or dreaming? Action structures and space in undergraduates’ metaphors of academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 12(3), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.12.03.01
Utami, T. R., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Urgensi Penalaran Dalam Argumentasi Hukum Guna Mengembangkan Pemikiran Hukum Yang Komprehensif. Crepido, 1(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.32-39
Budhyani, I. D. A. M., & Angendari, M. D. (2021). Kesulitan dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Mimbar Ilmu, 26(3), 400. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v26i3.40678
Dawud. (2008). Penalaran dalam karya tulis populer argumentatif. Bahasa Dan Seni, 36, 1, 41–48.
Farashaiyan, A., & Tan, K. H. (2012). On the relationship between pragmatic knowledge and language proficiency among Iranian male and female undergraduate EFL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 18(1), 33–46.
Fawaiz, S., Handayanto, S. K., & Wahyudi, H. S. (2020). Eksplorasi Keterampilan Penalaran Ilmiah Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(7), 934. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i7.13721
Heriyani. (2018). Eksistensi Perempuan Bali dalam Novel Tempurung Karya Oka Rusmini Kajian Feminisme Eksistensialis Simone De Beauvoir. In Eprints Universitas Negeri Makassar (Issue 1).
Khosa, D., & Ramakrishna, R. A. R. (2023). Graffiti and gender: A sociolinguistic study of wall writings in selected pakistani higher learning institutions. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2901-03
Lida, U. M. (2022). Struktur Isi Argumen dalam Teks Argumentasi Siswa Tahap Operasi Formal. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i2.318
Lida, U. M., & Zulaeha, I. (2017). Pola Penalaran Dalam Karangan Argumentasi Pada Siswa Tahap Operasi Formal. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 3(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v3i1.1570
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis a Sourcebook of New Methode. Sage Publications.
Mulyaningsih, I., Rahmat, W., Maknun, D., & Firdaus, W. (2022). How Competence of Production, Attention, Retention, Motivation, and Innovation Can Improve Students’ Scientific Writing Skills. International Journal of Language Education, 6(4), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.34360
O, H. (1969). Content Analysis for The Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison Wesly Publishing Company.
Peze, A. Ten, Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van Weijen, D. (2021). WRITING CREATIVE AND ARGUMENTATIVE TEXTS: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? Exploring how task type affects students’ writing behaviour and performance. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 21(2021), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.11
Scharlau, I., Karsten, A., & Rohlfing, K. (2021). Building, emptying out, or dreaming? Action structures and space in undergraduates’ metaphors of academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 12(3), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.12.03.01
Utami, T. R., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Urgensi Penalaran Dalam Argumentasi Hukum Guna Mengembangkan Pemikiran Hukum Yang Komprehensif. Crepido, 1(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.32-39