Article Sidebar

Download
Didah Nurhamidah, Muchlas Suseno, Samsi Setiadi

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the genre-based writing program in the Indonesian General Compulsory course at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training (FITK) UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta by using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and analysis of program-related documents. The results of the study show that genre-based writing programs are effective in improving students' writing skills, especially in writing essays, scientific articles, and literary works in accordance with the genre taught. The program is relevant to the vision and mission of the university and faculty which aims to produce competent and innovative graduates. However, there are challenges in terms of program policies that do not require students to participate in this program, as well as the need to improve lecturer training in the use of the latest learning technologies. Additionally, although most students feel their writing skills are improving, there is still room for the development of advanced and creative writing skills. This research provides recommendations to strengthen program policies, improve the use of technology, and introduce further challenges in writing tasks to optimize program impact.

Keywords

program evaluation; genre-based authorship; CIPP

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Didah Nurhamidah, Muchlas Suseno, Samsi Setiadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Al Fajri Bahri, S. P., Siregar, S. K., Par, A. M., Nur, R., AP, S., Al-Adawiyah, R., Putra, E., Yuliana, S. P., Lidan, A., & Ma’ruf, R. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Umsu press.
  2. Chang, W. (2014). Metodologi penulisan ilmiah.
  3. Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133–154.
  4. Derewianka, B. (2023). A teaching and learning cycle. Retrieved.
  5. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next-effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools.
  6. Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press.
  7. Jiang, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). Construction of teaching quality evaluation system of higher vocational project-based curriculum based on CIPP model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(6), 262–268.
  8. Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26.
  9. Keraf, G. (2004). Argumentasi dan narasi: komposisi lanjutan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  10. Kiuk, Y., Suputra, I. G. W., & Adnyani, L. D. S. (2021). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan menulis melalui strategi please. Indonesian Gender and Society Journal, 2(1), 10–17.
  11. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  12. Lea, M. R. (2008). Academic literacies in theory and practice. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 634–645). Springer.
  13. Mayasari, S., & Husin, A. (2017). Remaja genre: peluang menuju bonus demografi. Demography Journal of Sriwijaya (DeJoS), 1(2), 4–8.
  14. Muharika, D. (2019). Metodologi penelitian evaluasi program. Alfabeta.
  15. Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model evaluasi program dalam penelitian evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas (Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 3(1).
  16. Muslimin, K. (2019). Jurnalistik Dasar: Jurus Jitu Menulis Berita, Feature Biografi, Artikel Populer, dan Editorial. Unisnu Press.
  17. Nurani, S., Harared, N., & Purwanto, K. D. (2018). Penerapan Genre Based Approach di dalam Penulisan Memo Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal PkM (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 1(02), 159–169.
  18. Persadha, D. A. K. (2016). Studi kompetensi kemampuan menulis di kalangan mahasiswa. Muaddib: Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 6(1), 1–20.
  19. Putih, O. (2001). Penulisan kreatif: Teori, pengalaman, cabaran. Utusan Publications.
  20. Ratnay, G., Indriaswuri, R., Widayanthi, D. G. C., Atmaja, I., & Dalem, A. A. (2022). CIPP Evaluation Model for Vocational Education: A Critical Review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(3), 1–8.
  21. Rose, D. (2008). Writing as linguistic mastery: The development of genre-based literacy pedagogy. Handbook of Writing Development, 151–166.
  22. Santiyadnya, N. (2021). The effectiveness of CIPP model’s implementation in secondary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1810(1), 012071.
  23. Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The cipp model: Applications in language program evaluation. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), 1360.
  24. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). Professional standards and principles for evaluations. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, 279–302.
  25. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP evaluation model checklist.
  26. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2015). CIPP evaluation model checklist: A tool for applying the CIPP model to assess projects and programs. Western Michigan University Evaluation Center, 1–51.
  27. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
  28. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Publications.
  29. Trihono, E. S. (2021). Kemampuan Menulis Teks Naratif. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).