Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve the communication skills and understanding of students' concepts. This research is a class action. The subjects of this study were fifth grade students of public primary schools 32 Central Bengkulu which numbered 24 students. Data was collected through  observation  and  test  results.  Data  is  processed  by  using  the percentage of student success in classical and percentage of individual student's success. The results of this study indicate the application of cooperative learning model type TSTS can improve communication skills and understanding of the concept, students of class V public primary schools 32 Central Bengkulu. Improvement of communication skills through cooperative learning model type TSTS cycle I was 33.3%, cycle II was 62.5% and cycle III was 83.3%. Enhancement the understanding of students' concepts through cooperative learning models of the TSTS type in the second cycle was 37.5%, the second cycle was 66.7% and the third cycle was 95.8%, thus the application of the TSTS type of cooperative learning model can improve communication skills and conceptual understanding. The recommendation of this research is that teachers can use good learning method and to actively involve students in learning in order to improve their communication skill and students' concept understanding to be better

Article Details

How to Cite
Nofianti, S. W. (2022). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe The Two Stay Two Stray Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Pemahaman Konsep pada Pembelajaran IPA di Kelas V SDN 32 Bengkulu Tengah. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.33369/kapedas.v1i1.21064

References

  1. Durus, N., Coesamin, M., Djalil, A. 2014. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Ditinjau Dari Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa (Studi pada Siswa Kelas X SMAN 1 Ketapang Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013), Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol. 2, No. 2, Hal. 88-93.
  2. Goodwin M.W. 1999. Cooperative Learning and Social Skills: What Skills to Teach and How to Teach Them. Intervention in School and Clinic, Vol. 35, No. 1, Hal. 29-33.
  3. Halimatusssaadiah. 2018. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) dengan Menggunakan Peta Konsep untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VI.B SD Negeri 009 Tanjung Palas. Diakses dari: http://menulisbersamaaswir.com/2017/10/penerapan-model-pembelajaran- kooperatif.html
  4. Hariyanto dan Suryono. 2014. Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Konsep Dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  5. Hutagalung, I. 2007. Pengembangan Kepribadian. Bekasi: Direktorat Jendral.
  6. Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementrian Pendidikan. Nasional.
  7. Iriantara, Y. 2014. Komunikasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media. Isjoni. 2010. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Meningkatkan kecerdasan antar peserta didik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  8. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R.T. and Smith, K. 2007. The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 19, Hal. 15-29.
  9. Lie, A. 2008. Cooperative Learning: Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang- ruang Kelas. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
  10. Noviyanti, M. 2011. Pengaruh Motivasi dan Ketrampilan Berkomunikasi Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa pada Tutorial Online Berbasis Pendekatan Kontekstual pada Matakuliah Atatistika Pendidikan. Jurnal FKIP-UT. Vol. 12 No. 2, Hal. 1-12.
  11. Muslim, R. 2012. Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA Melalui metode “two stay two stray” (TSTS) pada Siswa Kelas IV SDN 02 Jatiharjo Kecamatan Jatipuro. Naskah Publikasi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  12. Prasodjo, B, 2010. Fisika 2 SMP Kelas VIII, Jakarta: Yudhistira. Prihantoro, L. 1986. Buku Materi IPA Terpadu. Jakarta: Karunika.
  13. Rahardjo, S dan Gudnanto. 2013. Pemahaman Individu Tekhnik Non Tes. Kudus: Nora Media Enterprise.
  14. Sagala, S. 2009. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  15. Sanjaya. 2008. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Hasil belajar. Jakarta: Prenada. Santrock JW. 2017. Psikologi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Prenada Media. Group.
  16. Sardiman, A.M. 2011. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo
  17. Slavin R. 1996. Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 1, Hal. 43-69.
  18. Solihatin, E dan Raharjo. 2007. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Sudijono, A. 2001. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo. Persada. Sugiyanto, 2009. Model-model pembelajaran Inovatif, Surakarta: Panitia Sertifikasi.
  19. Sutoyo. 2009. Pemahaman Individu, Observasi, Checklist, Interviu, Kuesioner dan Sosiometri. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  20. Syah, M. 2003. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  21. Tannen, K., Chatman, L., Allen, D. 2003. Approaches to Cell Biology Teaching: Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom-Beyond Students Working in Groups. Cell Biology Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, Hal. 1-5.
  22. Terenzini, P.T., Cabrera, A.F., Colbeck, C.L., Bjoklund, S.A. 2001. Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, Hal. 123–130.
  23. Trianto. 2013. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Perkasa.
  24. Tristiawati, D., Slamet, St.Y. dan Sularmi. 2017. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray Dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Kemampuan Memahami konsep IPA. PGSD FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.