Article Sidebar

Submitted
10 August 2022
Accepted
31 August 2022
Published
22 September 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 343 Download : 345

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of study is to describe how to develop, the feasibility and student responses to the development of discovery learning-based LKPD integrated with Geogebra in Geometry grade IV elementary school. This research includes research and development (Research and Development). The model used is Borg and Gall, namely: (1) Data and Information collection, (2) Planning, (3) initial product development, (4) Initial Field Test, (5) Product Revision, (6) Main Field Test, (7) Product Revision (8) Operational Field Trial (9) Final Product Revision, (10) Dissemination and distribution. In this development research, the researcher limits from 10 steps to 5 steps. The subjects in this study were teachers and fourth grade students of SD Negeri 01 Pendopo. The result of this research isthe LKPD of Mathematics based on Discovery Learning assisted by Geogebra is valid based on expert judgment on three aspects of feasibility. Feasibility of material with validity 0.87, feasibility of language with validity 0.94, and feasibility of graphic 0.91. 99% student response, and 95% teacher response. These results indicate that the Geogebra-assisted Discovery Learning-based Mathematics LKPD is feasible and gets a very positive response from students.

Keywords

LKPD Discovery Learning Geogebra Mathematics

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Mira Nopitria

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Karya ini dilisensikan di bawah  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .
How to Cite
Nopitria, M. N., Agus Susanta, & Irwan Koto. (2022). PENGEMBANGAN LEMBAR KERJA PESERTA DIDIK (LKPD) BERBASIS DISCOVERY LEARNING BERBANTUAN GEOGEBRA PADA GEOMETRI KELAS IV SD. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.33369/kapedas.v1i2.23286
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Antohe, V. (2009). Limits of Educational Soft “Geogebra” in a Critical Constructive Review. Annals. Computer Science Series, 47-54.
  2. Arbain, N., & Shukor, N. A. (2015). The Effects of Geogebra on Students Achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172(2007), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.356
  3. Atiaturrahmaniah, Ibrahim, D. S. M., & Kudsiah, M. (2017). Pengembangan Pendidikan Matematika SD
  4. Bulut, M., Akçak?n, H. Ü., Kaya, G., & Akçak?n, V. (2016). The effects of Geogebra on third grade primary students’ academic achievement in fractions. Mathematics Education, 11(2), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.12973/iser.2016.2109a
  5. Delima, M. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik Berbasis Discovery Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas IV Di Sekolah Dasar.
  6. Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas Nomor 22 Tahun 2006. Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order, 44(2), 8–10.
  7. Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Pelajaran. Depdiknas: Jakarta.
  8. Fitriyadi, H. (2013). Integrasi Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi dalam Pendidikan : Potensi Manfaat, Masyarakat Berbasis Pengetahuan, Pendidikan Nilai, Strategi Implementasi dan Pengembangan Profesional. Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan, 21(3), 269–284.
  9. Hohenwarter, M., & Fuchs, K. (2005). Combination of dynamic geometry , algebra and calculus in the software system Geogebra. Computer Algebra Systems and Dynamic Geometry Systems in Mathematics Teaching Conference 2004, 2002(July), 1–6. http://www.Geogebratube.org/material/show/id/747
  10. Karso. (2019). Pembelajaran Matematika di SD. Pendidikan Matematika I, 1–66.
  11. Kemendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016. 42(1), 1–10.
  12. Kemendikbud. (2013). Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
  13. ________Mathematics performance (PISA). (2020). Retrieved from OECD: https://data.oecd.org/pisa/mathematics-performance-pisa.htm
  14. Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yokyakarta: DIVA Press.
  15. Rahmi, S. A. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan …. https://jurnal-lp2m.umnaw.ac.id/index.php/JPPT/article/view/346
  16. Roestiyah. (1998). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  17. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Research and Depelopment. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  18. Susanta, A. (2012). Professional Learning for Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving in Indonesian Primary Schools. September.
  19. Umbaryati. (2018). Pentingnya LKPD pada Pendekatan Scientific Pembelajaran Matematika. Universitas Lampung, 217–225.
  20. Wicaksono, d. (2015). Teori Pembelajaran Bahasa (Suatu Catatan singkat). Yogyakarta: Garudhawaca.
  21. Widoyoko, S. Eko Putro. (2012). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
  22. Winarni, E. W. (2018). Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK dan R&D . Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.