Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the cognitive appearance and quality of empirical questions about school exams. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The subject of this research is a matter of school exams for science subjects. The object of research is the description and quality of the items empirically. The research instrument was in the form of an analysis of the percentage level of knowledge and quality of items empirically. The research data were analyzed using proportions calculated by percentage and rater agreement as well as student scores tested for validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discriminatory power. The results showed that: 1) The percentage of questions at Level 1 was 52.50%. At Level 2, 22.50% is less than the ideal standard of BSNP. At Level 3 of 25%, and 2) The quality of the items empirically, the results of the validity of 22 questions are valid and 18 questions are not valid, the results of the reliability test are 0.629, the difficulty level test is 5 easy questions (12.5%), 27 questions moderate (67.5%) and 8 difficult questions (20%,) the results of the discriminatory test were 25 bad questions (62.5%) and 15 questions were sufficient (37.5%). Thus, the quality of the science test items for grade VI students of SDN Pendopo, Empat Lawang Regency 2020/2021 is not good, judging from the comparison of the level of knowledge and quality empirically.

Keywords

item analysis cognitive level and empirical validity

Article Details

How to Cite
Fabil, F., Irwan Koto, & Endang Widi Winarni. (2022). Analisis Persentase Jenjang Kognitif Dan Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Sekolah Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Kelas VI SDN Pendopo Kabupaten Empat Lawang Tahun Pelajaran 2020/2021. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.33369/kapedas.v1i2.23293

References

  1. Angriani, A.D., Mania, S., Alam, S., Rasyid, M.R., & Kusumayanti, A. (2021). Analysis of Final Exam Problems in Mathematics Semester of Junior High School. Alauddin Journal of Mathematics Education, 3 (1), 1-11.
  2. Anita, Tyowati, S., & Zuldafrial. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Fisika Kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 35–47.
  3. Arifin, Z. (2014). Penelitian Pendidika: Metode dan Paradigma Baru . Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  4. BSNP. (2018). Buletin BSNP: Media Komunikasi dan Dialog Standar Pendidikan. Jakarta: BSNP.
  5. Cooper, J, M., Irizarry, J. G., & Leighton, M. S.. (2011). Classroom teaching
  6. skills 9 ed.). USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  7. Febriyanti, E., Gustinova, W.A., & Walid, A. (2020). Analisis Instrumen Penilaian Tengah Semester IPA-FisikaKelas IX SMPN 09 Kota Bengkulu. DIFFRACTION: Journal for Physics Education and Applied Physics, 2 (2), 93-97.
  8. Halimah, L. (2017). Keterampilan Mengajar: Sebagai Inspirasi Untuk Menjadi Guru Yang Excellent Di Abad Ke-21. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
  9. Kurniawan, T. (2015). Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Akhir Semester Gasal Mata Pelajaran IPS Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 1–6.
  10. Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan, R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  11. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R & D, dan Penelitian Pendidikan). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  12. Susanto, H., Rinaldi, A., & Novalia. (2015). Analisis Validitas Reabilitas Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Beda pada Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6 (2), 203–217.
  13. Tarmizi, P., Setiono, P., Amaliyah, Y., & Agrian, A. (2020). Analisis Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Tema Sehat itu Penting Kelas V SD Negeri 04 Kota Bengkulu. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal). 4 (2), 124-132.