Article Sidebar

Submitted
10 August 2022
Accepted
29 August 2022
Published
22 September 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 636 Download : 756

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the percentage of knowledge dimensions and cognitive levels on school exam questions for the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 Science subjects at SDN 04 Pendopo District. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The research subject is in the form of school exam questions for science subjects. The object of research is the percentage of knowledge dimensions and cognitive level of the questions. The research instrument was in the form of a sheet of knowledge dimension analysis and cognitive levels. The results show that: The highest percentage of knowledge dimensions on US IPA 2019/2020 questions are factual dimensions of 33 questions (82.50%), conceptual dimensions of 7 questions (17.50%), and procedural and metacognitive dimensions of 0% . The highest percentage of dimensions in the US IPA 2020/2021 questions is the factual dimension of 32 questions (80.00%), the conceptual dimension is 8 questions (20.00%) and the procedural and metacognitive dimensions are 0%. Percentage of cognitive level of US IPA 2019/2020 items for the highest cognitive level, namely applying (C3) as many as 16 questions (40%), understanding (C2) as many as 13 questions (32.50%), analyzing (C4) as many as 11 questions ( 27.50%), and remembering (C1), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6) did not appear. Percentage of cognitive level of US IPA items in 2020/2021 for the highest cognitive level, namely analyzing (C4) as many as 19 questions (47.50%), applying (C3) as many as 12 questions (30.00%), understanding (C2) as many as 8 questions (20.00%), evaluates (C5) as much as 1 question (2.50%). Thus, it can be concluded that the quality of the school exam questions for the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 school year subjects in SDN 04 Pendopo District is viewed from the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive level of the questions.

Keywords

item analysis knowledge dimension and cognitive level.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Suwai Batul Aslamiah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Karya ini dilisensikan di bawah  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .
How to Cite
Aslamiah, S. B. A., Irwan Koto, & Endang Widi Winarni. (2022). Analisis Butir Soal Ditinjau Dari Unsur Dimensi Pengetahuan Dan Jenjang Kognitif Soal Ujian Sekolah Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020 dan 2020/2021 Mata Pelajaran IPA SDN 04 Kecamatan Pendopo. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.33369/kapedas.v1i2.23296
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  2. BSNP. (2018). Buletin BSNP: Media Komunikasi dan Dialog Standar Pendidikan. Jakarta: BSNP.
  3. Daryanto & Karim, S. (2017). Pembelajaran Abad 21. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
  4. Depdiknas. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
  5. Halimah, L. (2017). Keterampilan Mengajar (Sebagai Inspirasi Untuk Menjadi Guru Yang Excellent Di Abad Ke-21). Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
  6. Jusuf, R., Sopandi, W., Ratnawulan, A., & Sa’ud, U. D. (2018). Profil Karakteristik Ujian Nasional IPA SD Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. Jurnal Visipena, 1115-1127.
  7. Kholifah, Hanifah, & Siagian. (2021), Analisis Soal Matematika Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Ditinjau dari Aspek Kognitif pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 13 Mukomuko Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020, Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 8 (1), 99-110.
  8. Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  9. Rahmadhani, Y. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Sekolah Mata Pelajaran IPA Berdasarkan Dimensi Pengetahuan Faktual dan Konseptual Ditinjau dari Konten dan Konteks, Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar, 4 (1). 1-12.
  10. Sukmadinata, N.S. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  11. Sutisna, A., & Hesya, A. F. (2019). Metode Pembelajaran di Era Milenial. Bandung: Manggu Makmur Tanjung Lestari.
  12. Wijaya, A., Eresti, A., Despa, & Walid, A., (2019), Analisis Butir Soal Persiapan Ujian Nasional IPA SMP/MTS Tahun 2018 Sampai dengan 2019 Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 9 (2), 57-63.