Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 15 Download : 4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRAK


Pembelajaran fisika seringkali dihadapkan pada berbagai tantangan, yakni konsep yang abstrak, metode pengajaran yang kurang interaktif dan tidak berorientasi student centered, serta keterbatasan fasilitas laboratorium yang berdampak pada rendahnya hasil belajar dan kurangnya pengembangan keterampilan abad 21 yang krusial di era Society 5.0. Menjawab permasalahan ini, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalsis pengaruh penggunaan simulasi PhET terhadap peningkatan hasil belajar fisika siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Watubangga. Metode penelitian menggunakan desain kuasi-eksperimental dengan pendekatan Nonequivalent Control Group Designs. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari dua kelas yang dipilih secara cluster random sampling, satu sebagai kelompok eksperimen yang menerima pembelajaran fisika menggunakan simulasi PhET, dan satu sebagai kelompok kontrol yang menerima pembelajaran konvensional. Instrumen tes hasil belajar fisika divalidasi secara komprehensif, termasuk validitas isi menggunakan koefisien Aiken's V dan validitas empiris menggunakan model Rasch, serta reliabilitas diukur dengan Cronbach's Alpha. Analisis data menggunakan deskriptif statistic dan analisis inferensial dengan uji-t independen pada skor N-Gain. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan peningkatan hasil belajar fisika yang signifikan pada kelompok eksperimen dibandingkan dengan kelompok kontrol, yakni hasil deskriptif statistik rerata skor N-Gain kelompok eksperimen 0.38 (kategori sedang) dan uji inferensial diperoleh nilai p < 0.001 dari uji-t independen. Temuan ini menyimpulkan bahwa simulasi PhET merupakan alat yang efektif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa yang berdampak pada peningkatan hasil belajar fisika, sekaligus menjadi strategi inovatif untuk menjawab tantangan transformasi pembelajaran fisika di era Society 5.0, yakni mempersiapkan siswa dengan keterampilan abad ke-21 yang relevan.


 


Kata kunci : PhET Simulasi, Hasil Belajar Fisika, Transformasi Pembelajaran, Society 5.0


 


ABSTRACT


Physics learning faces various challenges, including abstract concepts, teaching methods that are insufficiently interactive and not student-centered, and limited laboratory facilities. These issues contribute to low learning outcomes and insufficient development of 21st-century skills that are crucial in the Society 5.0 era. To address these problems, this study aims to analyze the effect of using PhET simulations on improving the physics learning outcomes of 10th-grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Watubangga. This research is quasi-experimental with Nonequivalent Control Group Design approach. The sample consisted of two classes selected through cluster random sampling: one as the experimental group, which received physics instruction using PhET simulations, and one as the control group, which received conventional instruction. The learning outcome test instrument underwent comprehensive validation, including content validity using Aiken’s V and empirical validity through the Rasch model. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics with an independent t-test on normalized gain (N-Gain) scores. The results revealed a statistically significant improvement in the learning outcomes of the experimental group compared to the control group, with an average N-Gain score of 0.38 (categorized as moderate). The inferential analysis yielded a p-value < 0.001 in the independent t-test. These findings suggest that PhET simulations are effective tools for enhancing students’ conceptual understanding that positively impacting physics learning outcomes. Moreover, PhET simulations offer an innovative instructional strategy for transforming physics education in the Society 5.0 era, particularly in preparing students with relevant 21st-century competencies.


 


Keywords: PhET Simulations, Physics Learning Outcomes, Instructional Transformation, Society 5.0

Keywords

PhET Simulasi Hasil Belajar Fisika Transformasi Pembelajaran Society 5.0 PhET Simulasi Hasil Belajar Fisika Transformasi Pembelajaran Society 5.0

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 I Gede Purwana Edi Saputra, Surya Nigsih, Triani Triani, Bardan Bulaka, Rina Sardiana Sari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Kumparan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Saputra, I. G. P. E., Nigsih, S., Triani, T., Bulaka, B., & Sari, R. S. (2025). PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN PHET SIMULASI TERHADAP PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA: UPAYA MENJAWAB TANTANGAN TRANSFORMASI PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA ERA SOCIETY 5.0. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 8(3), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.8.3.117-130
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Pratiwi SN, Cari C, Aminah NS. Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika. 2019 Oct;9(1):34-42. Available from: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jmpf/article/view/31612
  2. Suprapto N. Do We Experience Misconceptions?: An Ontological Review of Misconceptions in Science. 2020;1(2):50–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i2.24
  3. Guerra-Reyes F, Guerra-Dávila E, Naranjo-Toro M, Basantes-Andrade A, Guevara-Betancourt S. Misconceptions in the learning of natural sciences: A systematic review. Education Sciences. 2024 May 6;14(5):497. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/5/497/htm
  4. Saputra IGPE. Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa Menggunakan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif pada Materi Gerak Lurus di SMK Negeri 2 Watubangga. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online) [Internet]. 2020 Dec 30 [cited 2021 Jun 29];8(3). Available from: http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/EPFT/article/view/17093
  5. Khoirunnisa R, Syuhendri, Kistiono, Afifa M. Misconceptions of High School Students on Motion and Force Using the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2024 May 25;10(5):2711–20.
  6. Rahmawati DU, Jumadi, Kuswanto H, Oktaba IA. Identification of students’ misconception with isomorphic multiple choices test on the force and newton’s law material. J Phys Conf Ser [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Apr 30];1440(1):012052. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012052
  7. Cahyaningrum R, Hidayat A, Sutopo S. Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Mahasiswa pada Materi Induksi Elektromagnetik. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan [Internet]. 2018 Oct 1 [cited 2025 Apr 30];3(10):488131. Available from: https://www.neliti.com/publications/488131/
  8. Sari AL, Parno & Taufiq A. Kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep fisika siswa sma pada materi hukum Newton. InProsiding Seminar Nasional Pend. IPA Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang 2016.
  9. Sofiani E. Pengaruh model inkuiri terbimbing (guided inquiry) terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa pada konsep listrik dinamis. 2011 [cited 2025 May 28]; Available from: https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/1468
  10. Rahmawati M, Ruslan A, Bandarsyah D. The Era of Society 5.0 as the unification of humans and technology: A literature review on materialism and existentialism. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika. 2021 Sep 7;16(2):151.
  11. Sariwardani A. Manajemen Pendidikan Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Dan Society 5.0. Central Publisher [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Dec 26];1(9):1035–48. Available from: https://centralpublisher.co.id/jurnalcentralpublisher/index.php/Publish/article/view/201
  12. Mytra P, Wardawaty A, Kusnadi R. Society 5.0 in education: Higher order thinking skills. InBIS-HSS 2020: Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia 2021 Sep 27 (Vol. 242). European Alliance for Innovation.
  13. Rawat R, Goyal HR, Sharma S. Artificial Narrow Intelligence Techniques in Intelligent Digital Financial Inclusion System for Digital Society. 2023 6th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks, ISCON 2023.
  14. Deguchi A, Hirai C, Matsuoka H, Nakano T, Oshima K, Tai M, et al. What is society 5.0? Society 50: A People-centric Super-smart Society [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jul 8];1–23. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4_1
  15. Saputra IGPE. Development of E-Learning Physics Using Google Sites Assisted by Quizizz and PhET Simulations. Navigation Physics : Journal of Physics Education [Internet]. 2025 Jun 30 [cited 2025 Jul 7];7(1):93–106.
  16. Available from: https://journal.unindra.ac.id/index.php/jpeu/article/view/4129
  17. Wirda W, Mauvizar E, Lubis SPW, Muzana SR. Utilization of PhET Simulations in Replacing Real Laboratories for Physics Learning. Radiasi : Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika. 2023 Sep 30;16(2):71–9.
  18. Faizah SN, Dina LN, Kartiko A, Maarif MA, Hasan MS. Student Acceptance Study of PhET Simulation with an Expanded Technology Acceptance Model Approach. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS). 2023 Dec;5(1):279-90. Available from: https://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/jaets/article/view/3041
  19. Toma MJ. The pedagogical opportunities of PhET Interactive Simulations in secondary science education in Bangladesh [Internet]. open.library.ubc.ca; 2023. Available from: https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0434198
  20. Perkins K, Adams W, Dubson M, Finkelstein N, Reid S, Wieman C, et al. PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics. Phys Teach [Internet]. 2005 Dec 22 [cited 2023 Mar 22];44(1):18. Available from: https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1119/1.2150754
  21. Rizaldi DR, Jufri AW, Jamaluddin J. PhET: Simulasi Interaktif Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan. 2020 May 9;5(1):10–4.
  22. Drastisianti A, Dewi AK, Alighiri D. Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry Learning With PhET Simulation to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability and Understanding of Reaction Rate Concepts. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education [Internet]. 2024 Dec 21 [cited 2025 Jun 19];8(2):235. Available from: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijpte/article/view/93924
  23. Putranta H, Wilujeng I. Physics learning by PhET simulation-assisted using problem based learning (PBL) model to improve students' critical thinking skills in work and energy chapters in MAN 3 Sleman. InAsia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 2019 Aug 1 (Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1-44). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.
  24. Badriyah B, Dwi Setiyo R, Firdausi Z El, Nuqia K, Ketut Mahardika I, Baktiarso S. Manfaat PhET Simulasi Dalam Menopang Sarana dan Prasarana Laboratorium Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan [Internet]. 2023 Jan 24 [cited 2025 Jun 19];9(2):84–90.
  25. Available from: https://jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/JIWP/article/view/3579
  26. Nurulhidayah M, Lubis P. Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning menggunakan media simulasi PhET terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Apr 7];
  27. Available from: https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/fisika/article/view/2461
  28. Eveline E, Wilujeng I, Kuswanto H. The effect of scaffolding approach assisted by PhET simulation on students’ conceptual understanding and students’ learning independence in physics. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2019 Jun 1 (Vol. 1233, No. 1, p. 012036). IOP Publishing.
  29. Fitriani A. Comparison of the Effect of Using Virtual Laboratory Based on PhET Simulation and Real Laboratory in Improving Mastery of Electronic Concepts of Physics Education Students. Tekno - Pedagogi : Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan [Internet]. 2024 Oct 7 [cited 2025 May 29];14(2):22–8.
  30. Available from: https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pedagogi/article/view/37487
  31. Theasy Y, Bustan A, Nawir M, Kunci K. Penggunaan Media Laboratorium Virtual PhET Simulation untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Eksperimen Fisika Sekolah. Variabel [Internet]. 2021 Oct 31 [cited 2025 Jul 6];4(2):39–45. Available from: https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/jvar/article/view/2607
  32. Badriyah B, Setiyo RD, Firdausi Z El, Nuqia K, Mahardika IK, Baktiarso S. Manfaat PhET Simulasi Dalam Menopang Sarana dan Prasarana Laboratorium Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan [Internet]. 2023 Jan 24 [cited 2025 Jun 10];9(2):84–90. Available from: https://jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/JIWP/article/view/3579
  33. Taibu R, Mataka LL, Shekoyan V. Using PhET simulations to improve scientific skills and attitudes of community college students [Internet]. academicworks.cuny.edu; 2021. Available from: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/qb_pubs/81/
  34. Qahfi BA, Rahmatillah. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Simulasi PhET Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa di SMAN 1 Donggo. Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA [Internet]. 2022 Jun 7 [cited 2025 Jun 11];5(2):133–9. Available from: https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jpmpi/article/view/1591
  35. Drastisianti A, Dewi AK, Alighiri D. Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry Learning With PhET Simulation to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability and Understanding of Reaction Rate Concepts. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education [Internet]. 2024 Dec 21 [cited 2025 Jun 19];8(2):235. Available from: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijpte/article/view/93924
  36. Arifin MM, Prastowo SB, Harijanto A. Efektivitas Penggunaan Simulasi Phet Dalam Pembelajaran Online Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika [Internet]. 2022 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Mar 22];11(1):16–27.
  37. Available from: https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/30612
  38. Muzana SR, Lubis SPW, Wirda W. Penggunaan Simulasi Phet Terhadap Efektifitas Belajar IPA. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan [Internet]. 2021 Jan 31 [cited 2023 Mar 22];5(1):227–36. Available from: http://103.52.61.43/index.php/dedikasi/article/view/1587
  39. Abraham I, Supriyati Y. Desain Kuasi Eksperimen Dalam Pendidikan: Literatur Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education. 2022 Aug 27;8(3).
  40. Hastjarjo TD. Rancangan Eksperimen-Kuasi. Buletin Psikologi [Internet]. 2019 Dec 5 [cited 2025 Jun 11];27(2):187–203.
  41. Available from: https://journal.ugm.ac.id/buletinpsikologi/article/view/38619
  42. Hastjarjo DT. Rancangan Eksperimen-Kuasi. Buletin Psikologi [Internet]. 2019 Dec 5 [cited 2025 Jul 7];27(2):187–203.
  43. Available from: https://journal.ugm.ac.id/buletinpsikologi/article/view/38619
  44. Denny M, Denieffe S, O’Sullivan K. 15 Non-equivalent Control Group Pretest–Posttest Design in Social and Behavioral Research. [Internet]. 2023 May 25 [cited 2025 Jul 7];314–32.
  45. Sedgwick P. Cluster sampling. BMJ [Internet]. 2014 Jan 31 [cited 2025 Jul 8];348. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g1215
  46. Smith JL, Sturrock HJW, Olives C, Solomon AW, Brooker SJ. Comparing the Performance of Cluster Random Sampling and Integrated Threshold Mapping for Targeting Trachoma Control, Using Computer Simulation. 2013 [cited 2025 Jul 8];7(8):e2389. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0002389
  47. Krathwohl DR. A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Vol. 41, Theory into Practice. Ohio State University Press; 2002. p. 212–8.
  48. Nabil NRA, Wulandari I, Yamtinah S, Ariani SRD, Ulfa M. Aiken Index Analysis to Determine The Contents Validity of The Minimum Competency Assessment Instrument Based on Chemical Science Context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 8];25(2):184–91. Available from: http://jurnal.uns.ac.id/paedagogia
  49. Helmiyatun, Taqiudin M, Ahmad. Content Validity of Student Perception Instrument on School Educational Management. Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development [Internet]. 2025 Feb 25 [cited 2025 Jul 8];5(1):93–103. Available from: https://digitalpress.gaes-edu.com/index.php/jpled/article/view/422
  50. Andrich D. The Rasch Model Explained. Applied Rasch Measurement: A Book of Exemplars 2005 [cited 2025 Jul 8];27–59. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-3076-2_3
  51. Glas CAW, Verhelst ND. Testing the Rasch Model. Rasch Models [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2025 Jul 8];69–95. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7_5
  52. Cortina JM. What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1993;78(1):98–104.
  53. Amirrudin M, Nasution K, Supahar S. Effect of Variability on Cronbach Alpha Reliability in Research Practice. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika dan Komputasi. 2021 Dec 23;17(2):223–30. Available from: http://journal-old.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jmsk/article/view/11655
  54. Sukarelawa MI, Indratno TK, Ayu SM. N-Gain vs Stacking : Analisis Perubahan Abilitas Peserta Didik dalam Desain One Group Pretest-Posttest [Internet]. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Suryacahya Universitas Ahmad Dahlan; 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 9]. 1–53 p. Available from: https://eprints.uad.ac.id/60868/1/Layout--N-Gain%20-%20Press.pdf
  55. Bao L. Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. American journal of physics. 2006 Oct 1;74(10):917-22.
  56. Bonate PL. Analysis of Pretest-Posttest Designs. Analysis of Pretest-Posttest Designs. 2000 May 12;
  57. Hanusz Z, Tarasinska J, Zielinski W. Shapiro–Wilk Test with Known Mean. REVSTAT-Statistical Journal [Internet]. 2016 Feb 25 [cited 2025 Jul 9];14(1):89-100–89–100. Available from: https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/180
  58. González-Estrada E, Cosmes W. Shapiro–Wilk test for skew normal distributions based on data transformations. J Stat Comput Simul [Internet]. 2019 Nov 22 [cited 2025 Jul 9];89(17):3258–72.
  59. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00949655.2019.1658763
  60. O’Neill ME, Mathews K. A weighted least squares approach to Levene’s test of homogeneity of variance. Aust N Z J Stat [Internet]. 2000 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Jul 9];42(1):81–100.
  61. O’Neill ME, Mathews KL. Levene Tests of Homogeneity of Variance for General Block and Treatment Designs. Biometrics [Internet]. 2002 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Jul 9];58(1):216–24. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00216.x
  62. Widhiarso W. Mengaplikasikan Uji-t untuk Membandingkan Gain Score antar Kelompok dalam Eksperimen. Yogyakarta; 2011.
  63. Prastika E, Purwanto A, Nirwana N. Pengaruh pendekatan interactive conceptual instruction (ici) berbantuan simulasi phet terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika. 2020;3(2):141-50. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/kumparan_fisika/article/view/11878
  64. Putri EM, Koto I, Putri DH. Peningkatan keterampilan proses sains dan penguasaan konsep gelombang cahaya dengan penerapan model inkuiri berbantuan simulasi phet di kelas xi mipa e sman 2 kota bengkulu. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika. 2018;1(2):46-52. Available from: https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/kumparan_fisika/article/view/6229
  65. Agusmin R, Nirwana N, Rohadi N. Peningkatan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa dengan Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Simulasi PhET di Kelas XI IPA-C SMAN 6 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika [Internet]. 2018 Oct 18 [cited 2025 Jul 9];1(2 Agustus):53–9. Available from: https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/kumparan_fisika/article/view/6230
  66. Puspitasari I, Susilawati E, Taman Siswa Bima S. Pengaruh Penggunaan Software Phet Sebagai Media Pembelajaran terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Siswa Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 1 Palibelo Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA [Internet]. 2018 Jun 30 [cited 2025 Jul 9];8(1):29–38. Available from: https://www.ejournal.tsb.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/view/48
  67. Saputra R, Susilawati S, Verawati NNSP. Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Simulasi Phet (Physics Education Technology) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Pijar Mipa [Internet]. 2020 Mar 1 [cited 2025 Jul 9];15(2):110–5.
  68. Available from: http://jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/1459
  69. Subiki S, Hamidy AN, Istighfarini ET, Suharsono FYH, Putri SFD. Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Phet Simulation Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sma Negeri Plus Sukowono Materi Usaha Dan Energi Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022. Orbita: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika [Internet]. 2022 Nov 7 [cited 2025 Jul 9];8(2):200–4. Available from: http://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/orbita/article/view/9586