Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 151 Download : 152

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to get the measurement result as a description of higher order thinking skill in taxonomy to critical thinking physics problem in SMA XI class. This study is descriptive qualitative through three stages, namely: initial development of the instrument, content validation and empirical, and measurement. The research has been conducted in the region of Central Bengkulu. The instrument used has been validated by the expert and applied rasch model. An empirical valiadation test was conducted by 95 students. A valid instrument is used to measure student's higher order thinking skills. The number of learners measured using a total sampling of 148 learners. The measurement result shows very high critical thinking 0,5%, ability critical thinking high 25%, ability medium critical thinking 55%, ability critical thinking low 19%, ability critical thinking very low 0, 5%. On the average it can be concluded that higher order thinking skills on taxonomy critical thinking students in Bengkulu Tengah included in medium criterion.

Article Details

License

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rochman, S., & Nirwana, N. (2020). Analisis High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Taksonomi Berpikir Kritis pada Permasalahan Fisika. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 4(2), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.4.2.40-44
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arslan, S. (2014). An Investigation of the relationships between Metacognition and Self Regulation with structural equation. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6 (3), 603-611.
  2. Ba?bay, M. (2013).Analysing the relationship of Critical Thinking and Metacognition with epistemological beliefs through structural equation modeling. Education and Science, 38, 169.
  3. Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429.
  4. Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649181
  5. Bernstein, Arla G. and Isaac Carol. (2018). Critical Thinking Criteria for Evaluating Online Discussion. . International Online Journal of Educational. Vol. 12, No. 2, Art. 11
  6. Crilly, N. (2010). The structure of design revolutions: Kuhnian paradigm shifts in creative problem solving. Design Issues, 26(1), 54–66. Retrieved from https://www.jstor .org/stable/pdf/20627842.pdf
  7. Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning. London: Kogan Page
  8. Dalgleish, Patrick Girard, and Maree Davies, 2017, “Critical Thinking, Bias and Feminist Philosophy: Building a Better Framework through Collaboration”, Informal Logic, 37(4): 351–369.
  9. Ditjen Pendidikan dan kebuayaan. (2018). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Diambil dari http://dikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/
  10. Duff, M. C., Kurczek, J., Rubin, R., Cohen, N. J., & Tranel, D. (2013). Hippocampal amnesia disrupts creative thinking. Hippocampus, 23(12), 1143–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002 /hipo.22208
  11. Gardner, Howard. (2013). Multiple Intelligences (terjemahanYelvi Andri Zaimul). New York : Basic Books. (buku asli terbitan tahun 2006).
  12. Kaufmann, J., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24(1),83–91.
  13. Kuswana.W.S. (2011). Taksonomi Berpikir. Bandung: Rosda Karya.
  14. Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity—A framework for the design/ problem solving discourse in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 35–52.
  15. Magno,C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition Learning, 5:137–156. DOI 10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4
  16. Molly, Espey. (2017) Enhancing Critical Thinking Using Team-Based Learning. Pages 15-29.
  17. OECD. PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment. [online]. Tersedi: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data
  18. Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Academic Press.
  19. Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Characteristics of problems for problem-based learning: The students’ perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(1), 6–33.
  20. Susiani , Tri Saptuti, Salimi , Moh, and Hidayah , Ratna. (2018). Research Based Learning (RBL): How to Improve Critical Thinking Skills. EDP Sciences. SHS Web of Conferences 42, 00042
  21. TIMSS & PIRL. 2016. Trends International Mathematics and Science Study. Tersedia di https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/
  22. Ulger, Kani. (2018). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on the Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking Disposition of Students in Visual Arts Education. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. Volume 12, Issue 1. Page 3-6.